Exploring the barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists: A qualitative study.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2416465
Ehsan Vesali-Monfared, Majid Barati, Leili Tapak, Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai
{"title":"Exploring the barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists: A qualitative study.","authors":"Ehsan Vesali-Monfared, Majid Barati, Leili Tapak, Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2416465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Road traffic injuries (RTIs) have been identified as a major public health problem worldwide. Motorcyclists are one of the most vulnerable groups in terms of injuries and fatalities in road traffic crashes. Not using a helmet and head and neck injuries are the main causes of death and disability among them. This study explores barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach to conventional content analysis was employed in this research. The purposive sampling method, with maximum diversity, was used to select participants among motorcyclists and traffic police officers in Qom City, Iran. To collect data and reach data saturation, 41 face-to-face semistructured interviews with 29 motorcyclists and 12 traffic police officers were conducted using the interview guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean and standard deviation of age were 32.6 ± 8.6 for the motorcyclist group and 34 ± 7.9 for the police group. Through qualitative data analysis, the codes were extracted from the collected data and categorized into 2 categories including barriers and facilitators. In the category of barriers 5 subcategories were identified including nonadherence to the helmet law, unpleasant feeling, psychological characteristics, economic factors, and helmet quality. In the category of facilitators, 3 subcategories were identified including education and information campaigns, encouragement and increase motivation, and policymaking and legislative measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Police supervision and law enforcement can be effective in improving the behavior of helmet use. Also, to create and increase the motorcyclists' motivation to use helmets, economic and cultural incentives and social participation can be used to facilitate acceptance of the law regarding helmet use. Furthermore, quality improvement of helmets to remove barriers and physical problems such as heat, visual and auditory restrictions, head movement restrictions, and weight can be very useful. The findings of this study can help to develop more appropriate and context-based interventions to increase helmet use and therefore to prevent RTIs in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2024.2416465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Road traffic injuries (RTIs) have been identified as a major public health problem worldwide. Motorcyclists are one of the most vulnerable groups in terms of injuries and fatalities in road traffic crashes. Not using a helmet and head and neck injuries are the main causes of death and disability among them. This study explores barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists.

Methods: A qualitative approach to conventional content analysis was employed in this research. The purposive sampling method, with maximum diversity, was used to select participants among motorcyclists and traffic police officers in Qom City, Iran. To collect data and reach data saturation, 41 face-to-face semistructured interviews with 29 motorcyclists and 12 traffic police officers were conducted using the interview guide.

Results: The mean and standard deviation of age were 32.6 ± 8.6 for the motorcyclist group and 34 ± 7.9 for the police group. Through qualitative data analysis, the codes were extracted from the collected data and categorized into 2 categories including barriers and facilitators. In the category of barriers 5 subcategories were identified including nonadherence to the helmet law, unpleasant feeling, psychological characteristics, economic factors, and helmet quality. In the category of facilitators, 3 subcategories were identified including education and information campaigns, encouragement and increase motivation, and policymaking and legislative measures.

Conclusion: Police supervision and law enforcement can be effective in improving the behavior of helmet use. Also, to create and increase the motorcyclists' motivation to use helmets, economic and cultural incentives and social participation can be used to facilitate acceptance of the law regarding helmet use. Furthermore, quality improvement of helmets to remove barriers and physical problems such as heat, visual and auditory restrictions, head movement restrictions, and weight can be very useful. The findings of this study can help to develop more appropriate and context-based interventions to increase helmet use and therefore to prevent RTIs in the community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索摩托车手使用头盔的障碍和促进因素:定性研究。
目的:道路交通伤害(RTIs)已被确定为全球主要的公共卫生问题。摩托车手是道路交通事故中最易受伤和死亡的群体之一。不戴头盔以及头颈部受伤是导致摩托车手死亡和残疾的主要原因。本研究探讨了摩托车手使用头盔的障碍和促进因素:本研究采用了传统内容分析的定性方法。在伊朗库姆市的摩托车驾驶员和交通警察中,采用了最大限度多样性的目的性抽样法来选择参与者。为了收集数据并达到数据饱和,研究人员使用访谈指南对 29 名摩托车手和 12 名交通警察进行了 41 次面对面的半结构化访谈:结果:摩托车手组的平均年龄为 32.6 ± 8.6 岁,警察组为 34 ± 7.9 岁,平均年龄和标准差分别为 32.6 ± 8.6 岁和 34 ± 7.9 岁。通过定性数据分析,从收集到的数据中提取了代码,并将其分为两类,包括障碍和促进因素。在障碍类别中,确定了 5 个子类别,包括不遵守头盔法、不愉快的感觉、心理特征、经济因素和头盔质量。在促进因素类别中,确定了 3 个子类别,包括教育和宣传活动、鼓励和提高积极性以及政策制定和立法措施:结论:警方的监督和执法可以有效改善头盔使用行为。同时,为了激发和提高摩托车手使用头盔的积极性,可以利用经济和文化激励措施以及社会参与来促进人们接受有关使用头盔的法律。此外,提高头盔质量,消除障碍和物理问题,如发热、视觉和听觉限制、头部活动限制和重量等,也非常有用。这项研究的结果有助于制定更适当的、基于具体情况的干预措施,以提高头盔的使用率,从而在社区预防 RTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors. Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests. Exploring the barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists: A qualitative study. Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1