MUC5B Genotype and Other Common Variants are Associated with Computational Imaging Features of UIP.

Rachel Z Blumhagen, Stephen M Humphries, Anna L Peljto, David A Lynch, Jonathan Cardwell, Tami J Bang, Shawn D Teague, Christopher Sigakis, Avram D Walts, Deepa Puthenvedu, Paul J Wolters, Timothy S Blackwell, Jonathan A Kropski, Kevin K Brown, Marvin I Schwarz, Ivana V Yang, Mark P Steele, David A Schwartz, Joyce S Lee
{"title":"<i>MUC5B</i> Genotype and Other Common Variants are Associated with Computational Imaging Features of UIP.","authors":"Rachel Z Blumhagen, Stephen M Humphries, Anna L Peljto, David A Lynch, Jonathan Cardwell, Tami J Bang, Shawn D Teague, Christopher Sigakis, Avram D Walts, Deepa Puthenvedu, Paul J Wolters, Timothy S Blackwell, Jonathan A Kropski, Kevin K Brown, Marvin I Schwarz, Ivana V Yang, Mark P Steele, David A Schwartz, Joyce S Lee","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202401-022OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Given this, we reasoned that differences in genetic profiles may be associated with unique clinical and radiologic features. Computational image analysis, sometimes referred to as radiomics, provides objective, quantitative assessments of radiologic features in subjects with pulmonary fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the genetic risk profile of patients with IPF identifies unique computational imaging phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with IPF were included in this study if they had genotype data and CT scans of the chest available for computational image analysis. Extent of lung fibrosis and likelihood of a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern were scored automatically by using two separate, previously validated deep learning techniques for CT analysis. UIP pattern was also classified visually by radiologists according to established criteria.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 334 participants with IPF, <i>MUC5B</i>, <i>FAM13A</i> and <i>ZKSCAN1</i> were independently associated with the deep learning-based UIP score. None of the common variants were associated with fibrosis extent by computational imaging. We did not find an association between <i>MUC5B</i>, <i>FAM13A</i> or <i>ZKSCAN1</i> and visually assessed UIP pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Select genetic variants are associated with computer-based classification of UIP on CT among patients with IPF. Analysis of radiologic features using deep learning may enhance our ability to identify important genotype-phenotype associations in fibrotic lung diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202401-022OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Given this, we reasoned that differences in genetic profiles may be associated with unique clinical and radiologic features. Computational image analysis, sometimes referred to as radiomics, provides objective, quantitative assessments of radiologic features in subjects with pulmonary fibrosis.

Objective: To determine if the genetic risk profile of patients with IPF identifies unique computational imaging phenotypes.

Methods: Participants with IPF were included in this study if they had genotype data and CT scans of the chest available for computational image analysis. Extent of lung fibrosis and likelihood of a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern were scored automatically by using two separate, previously validated deep learning techniques for CT analysis. UIP pattern was also classified visually by radiologists according to established criteria.

Measurements and main results: Among 334 participants with IPF, MUC5B, FAM13A and ZKSCAN1 were independently associated with the deep learning-based UIP score. None of the common variants were associated with fibrosis extent by computational imaging. We did not find an association between MUC5B, FAM13A or ZKSCAN1 and visually assessed UIP pattern.

Conclusions: Select genetic variants are associated with computer-based classification of UIP on CT among patients with IPF. Analysis of radiologic features using deep learning may enhance our ability to identify important genotype-phenotype associations in fibrotic lung diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MUC5B 基因型和其他常见变异与 UIP 的计算成像特征有关。
理由:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种复杂的异质性疾病。因此,我们推断遗传特征的差异可能与独特的临床和放射学特征有关。计算图像分析(有时称为放射组学)可对肺纤维化患者的放射学特征进行客观、定量的评估:确定 IPF 患者的遗传风险特征是否能识别独特的计算成像表型:方法:IPF 患者如果有基因型数据和可用于计算图像分析的胸部 CT 扫描图像,则纳入本研究。肺纤维化的程度和常见间质性肺炎(UIP)模式的可能性由两种独立的、先前经过验证的 CT 分析深度学习技术自动评分。放射科医生也根据既定标准对 UIP 模式进行了视觉分类:在 334 名 IPF 患者中,MUC5B、FAM13A 和 ZKSCAN1 与基于深度学习的 UIP 评分独立相关。没有一个常见变异与计算成像的纤维化程度相关。我们没有发现MUC5B、FAM13A或ZKSCAN1与视觉评估的UIP模式有关:结论:某些基因变异与 IPF 患者 CT 上基于计算机的 UIP 分类有关。利用深度学习分析放射学特征可能会提高我们识别肺纤维化疾病中重要基因型与表型关联的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airway Remodeling in Cystic Fibrosis Is Heterogeneous. County Level Social Determinates of Health and Correlation with COPD Prevalence in the US. Lest a Smoky Haze of Doubt Suffocate Progress Towards Better Pulse Oximeters. Lung Function Recovery from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Oral Antibiotics in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Trends in the Treatment of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1