Factors Associated with Referral to Expert Providers among Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Kari R Gillmeyer, Seppo T Rinne, Justin M Rucci, Elizabeth S Klings, A Rani Elwy, Renda Soylemez Wiener
{"title":"Factors Associated with Referral to Expert Providers among Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.","authors":"Kari R Gillmeyer, Seppo T Rinne, Justin M Rucci, Elizabeth S Klings, A Rani Elwy, Renda Soylemez Wiener","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-901OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Guidelines recommend early referral to pulmonary hypertension (PH) experts for patients with confirmed or suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), among others. Yet, patients often have advanced disease at the time of referral. The drivers of these referral delays are not well known.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Building upon our prior qualitative findings on barriers to timely PH care along the care continuum, we sought to identify patient-level factors associated with referral to PH experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database to identify all patients with incident PH in 2015-2017 using a validated algorithm (sensitivity 28%; specificity 100%) and further identified subgroups with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH. Our outcome was presence or absence of referral to a PH expert during the study period. Based on our prior qualitative work, our three primary exposures were 1) Medicaid recipient, 2) mental health diagnoses, and 3) distance to the nearest PH center. We conducted separate multivariable logistic regression models to determine the association between each of our primary exposures and outcome, among our entire cohort and those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among our entire cohort (n=12,505), 704 (5.6%) were seen by a PH expert. Among the subset with a risk factor for PAH (n=2,393) and CTEPH (n=3,167), 242 (10.1%) and 185 (5.8%) were seen by a PH expert, respectively. Patients less likely to be referred included Medicaid recipients (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.53-0.77), those with mental health diagnoses (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83), and those living further from a PH center (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.82 for each 10 miles increase in distance to PH center). Findings were similar among those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few patients with PH are referred to PH experts, including those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH. Factors associated with expert referral identified in this study highlight barriers to timely PH care and offer targeted areas of future study to improve the timeliness of PH care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-901OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Guidelines recommend early referral to pulmonary hypertension (PH) experts for patients with confirmed or suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), among others. Yet, patients often have advanced disease at the time of referral. The drivers of these referral delays are not well known.

Objectives: Building upon our prior qualitative findings on barriers to timely PH care along the care continuum, we sought to identify patient-level factors associated with referral to PH experts.

Methods: We leveraged the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database to identify all patients with incident PH in 2015-2017 using a validated algorithm (sensitivity 28%; specificity 100%) and further identified subgroups with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH. Our outcome was presence or absence of referral to a PH expert during the study period. Based on our prior qualitative work, our three primary exposures were 1) Medicaid recipient, 2) mental health diagnoses, and 3) distance to the nearest PH center. We conducted separate multivariable logistic regression models to determine the association between each of our primary exposures and outcome, among our entire cohort and those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH.

Results: Among our entire cohort (n=12,505), 704 (5.6%) were seen by a PH expert. Among the subset with a risk factor for PAH (n=2,393) and CTEPH (n=3,167), 242 (10.1%) and 185 (5.8%) were seen by a PH expert, respectively. Patients less likely to be referred included Medicaid recipients (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 0.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.53-0.77), those with mental health diagnoses (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83), and those living further from a PH center (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74-0.82 for each 10 miles increase in distance to PH center). Findings were similar among those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH.

Conclusions: Few patients with PH are referred to PH experts, including those with a risk factor for PAH and CTEPH. Factors associated with expert referral identified in this study highlight barriers to timely PH care and offer targeted areas of future study to improve the timeliness of PH care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delving Deeper into Genotypic-Phenotypic Associations in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Incidence and Predictors of Long-term Hypnotic Receipt among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. SGLT-2 Inhibitors and the Risk of COPD Exacerbations and Mortality in COPD Patients. Factors Associated with Referral to Expert Providers among Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension. Comprehensive Management Algorithm for Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease in the Real-World Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1