Thoughtful or distant farmer: Exploring the influence of human-animal relationships on rabbit stress, behaviour, and emotional responses in two distinct living environments.

Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) Pub Date : 2024-11-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/awf.2024.54
Manon Fetiveau, Davi Savietto, Andrew M Janczak, Laurence Fortun-Lamothe, Valérie Fillon
{"title":"Thoughtful or distant farmer: Exploring the influence of human-animal relationships on rabbit stress, behaviour, and emotional responses in two distinct living environments.","authors":"Manon Fetiveau, Davi Savietto, Andrew M Janczak, Laurence Fortun-Lamothe, Valérie Fillon","doi":"10.1017/awf.2024.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both the nature of the human-animal relationship (HAR) and housing conditions significantly impact the welfare of farmed animals. To evaluate the influence of HAR on the behaviour, emotions and stress of rabbits (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculus</i>) in two distinct outdoor living environments, we allocated 144 young rabbits to four groups (CPX-H, CPX-N, SPL-H, SPL-N) differing in the living environments (CPX for complex, and SPL for simple). The treatment by human (H) involved daily provision of additional food resources and stroking (thoughtful farmer). It commenced at 49 days of age and lasted for 16 days. N groups did not receive the treatment (distant farmer). The rabbits were observed between 48 and 73 days of age. Their behavioural responses to human presence were evaluated at 48 and 68 days using Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) and scan sampling. A set of tests was conducted at 68 days of age to assess their reactions to a novel object and human presence. Stress levels were measured by analysing corticosterone concentrations in their hair. Rabbits in the SPL environment spent significantly more time near the novel object than those in the CPX environment (24.7 vs 17.2%). Additionally, rabbits in the H treatment group spent more time near the human than those in the N treatment group (28.2 vs 17.1%) and accepted more strokes (90.2 vs 45.9%). Following the HAR treatment, rabbits in the H group were significantly more likely to be described as 'Affectionate/Interested' than those in the N treatment. Rabbits in the N treatment were described as 'Indifferent' significantly more in the SPL environment. However, there were no significant differences in hair corticosterone concentrations between the groups. These findings indicate that rabbits' responses are influenced by both their living environment and the quality of their relationship with humans. Encouraging positive interactions with animals may enhance their welfare and facilitate daily care from farmers.</p>","PeriodicalId":520228,"journal":{"name":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","volume":"33 ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal welfare (South Mimms, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/awf.2024.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both the nature of the human-animal relationship (HAR) and housing conditions significantly impact the welfare of farmed animals. To evaluate the influence of HAR on the behaviour, emotions and stress of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) in two distinct outdoor living environments, we allocated 144 young rabbits to four groups (CPX-H, CPX-N, SPL-H, SPL-N) differing in the living environments (CPX for complex, and SPL for simple). The treatment by human (H) involved daily provision of additional food resources and stroking (thoughtful farmer). It commenced at 49 days of age and lasted for 16 days. N groups did not receive the treatment (distant farmer). The rabbits were observed between 48 and 73 days of age. Their behavioural responses to human presence were evaluated at 48 and 68 days using Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) and scan sampling. A set of tests was conducted at 68 days of age to assess their reactions to a novel object and human presence. Stress levels were measured by analysing corticosterone concentrations in their hair. Rabbits in the SPL environment spent significantly more time near the novel object than those in the CPX environment (24.7 vs 17.2%). Additionally, rabbits in the H treatment group spent more time near the human than those in the N treatment group (28.2 vs 17.1%) and accepted more strokes (90.2 vs 45.9%). Following the HAR treatment, rabbits in the H group were significantly more likely to be described as 'Affectionate/Interested' than those in the N treatment. Rabbits in the N treatment were described as 'Indifferent' significantly more in the SPL environment. However, there were no significant differences in hair corticosterone concentrations between the groups. These findings indicate that rabbits' responses are influenced by both their living environment and the quality of their relationship with humans. Encouraging positive interactions with animals may enhance their welfare and facilitate daily care from farmers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体贴的农民还是疏远的农民在两种不同的生活环境中,探索人与动物的关系对兔子压力、行为和情绪反应的影响。
人与动物关系(HAR)的性质和饲养条件都会对养殖动物的福利产生重大影响。为了评估在两种不同的室外生活环境中人与动物关系对兔子(Oryctolagus cuniculus)的行为、情绪和压力的影响,我们将 144 只幼兔分为四组(CPX-H、CPX-N、SPL-H、SPL-N),四组的生活环境各不相同(CPX 为复杂环境,SPL 为简单环境)。人类(H)的治疗包括每天提供额外的食物资源和抚摸(体贴的农夫)。治疗从 49 日龄开始,持续 16 天。N 组不接受治疗(远距离饲养)。对 48 到 73 日龄的兔子进行了观察。在 48 天和 68 天时,使用定性行为评估 (QBA) 和扫描取样评估兔子对人类存在的行为反应。68日龄时进行了一组测试,以评估它们对新物体和人类存在的反应。通过分析兔子毛发中的皮质酮浓度来测量应激水平。SPL环境下的兔子在新物体附近停留的时间明显多于CPX环境下的兔子(24.7%对17.2%)。此外,H 处理组兔子在人类附近停留的时间比 N 处理组兔子多(28.2 比 17.1%),接受的抚摸次数也更多(90.2 比 45.9%)。接受 HAR 治疗后,H 组兔子被描述为 "亲切/感兴趣 "的几率明显高于 N 组兔子。在 SPL 环境中,N 组兔子被描述为 "冷漠 "的比例明显高于 H 组。然而,各组之间的毛发皮质酮浓度并无明显差异。这些研究结果表明,兔子的反应既受其生活环境的影响,也受其与人类关系质量的影响。鼓励与动物进行积极的互动可以提高它们的福利,并方便养殖者对它们进行日常照料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emergency response in overturned pig transport vehicles: Description and discussion of Danish cases from a One Welfare perspective. A qualitative exploration of owner experiences following dog adoption. A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare. 'No one cares about the animal like me.' Indian veterinarians' experiences of improving animal welfare through Continuing Professional Development. Job satisfaction and animal welfare at slaughter: A survey of Official Veterinarians in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1