Predicting permeability in sandstone reservoirs from mercury injection capillary pressure data using advanced machine learning algorithms

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-12145-6
Faiq Azhar Abbasi, Areesha Sajjad, Mohsin Ayubi, Ghulam Haider, Shaine Mohammadali Lalji, Syed Imran Ali, Muneeb Burney
{"title":"Predicting permeability in sandstone reservoirs from mercury injection capillary pressure data using advanced machine learning algorithms","authors":"Faiq Azhar Abbasi,&nbsp;Areesha Sajjad,&nbsp;Mohsin Ayubi,&nbsp;Ghulam Haider,&nbsp;Shaine Mohammadali Lalji,&nbsp;Syed Imran Ali,&nbsp;Muneeb Burney","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-12145-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining the permeability of the reservoir in the absence of well logs and core analysis data is a challenge in the oil and gas industry. Even though correlations such as Winland and Pittman exist, they often fail to provide an accurate permeability value. This study utilized the mercury injection capillary pressure data from published literature to determine the permeability in sandstone reservoirs. The dataset included parameters such as pore throat radius at various mercury saturations (25%, 35%, 50%, and 75%), along with permeability and porosity determined through laboratory experiments. Different machine learning techniques, namely, LASSO regression, ridge regression, support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF) regression, decision tree (DT) regression, <i>K</i>-nearest neighbor (KNN) regression, gradient boosting, Ada Boost, and multilayered perceptron (MLP) were used to determine permeability values form porosity, pore throat radii, and pore throat sorting data. Sixty-three samples were randomly divided into training and test sets, out of which 75% were used for training both the models while 25% were used to test them. The regression coefficients suggested that pore throat radius at 75% saturation (r75) had the highest influence on the permeability values, followed by porosity (phi) and r50. It was noted that as the learning rate increased, the root mean squared error (RMSE) gradually reduced from 48.9208 to 47.2889 for ridge and LASSO-normal, while for ridge and LASSO-polynomial 99.97 to 52.2629. Various models and correlations have been developed in previous studies; however, the lithological characteristics of reservoir rock vary with location and subsurface factors. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of machine learning models with mercury injection capillary data for accurate permeability predictions, addressing the limitations of traditional correlations and offering a reliable method for characterizing sandstone reservoirs in the absence of well log data and evaluating the flow behavior of reservoir fluids within the porous media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-12145-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the permeability of the reservoir in the absence of well logs and core analysis data is a challenge in the oil and gas industry. Even though correlations such as Winland and Pittman exist, they often fail to provide an accurate permeability value. This study utilized the mercury injection capillary pressure data from published literature to determine the permeability in sandstone reservoirs. The dataset included parameters such as pore throat radius at various mercury saturations (25%, 35%, 50%, and 75%), along with permeability and porosity determined through laboratory experiments. Different machine learning techniques, namely, LASSO regression, ridge regression, support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF) regression, decision tree (DT) regression, K-nearest neighbor (KNN) regression, gradient boosting, Ada Boost, and multilayered perceptron (MLP) were used to determine permeability values form porosity, pore throat radii, and pore throat sorting data. Sixty-three samples were randomly divided into training and test sets, out of which 75% were used for training both the models while 25% were used to test them. The regression coefficients suggested that pore throat radius at 75% saturation (r75) had the highest influence on the permeability values, followed by porosity (phi) and r50. It was noted that as the learning rate increased, the root mean squared error (RMSE) gradually reduced from 48.9208 to 47.2889 for ridge and LASSO-normal, while for ridge and LASSO-polynomial 99.97 to 52.2629. Various models and correlations have been developed in previous studies; however, the lithological characteristics of reservoir rock vary with location and subsurface factors. The novelty of this study lies in its integration of machine learning models with mercury injection capillary data for accurate permeability predictions, addressing the limitations of traditional correlations and offering a reliable method for characterizing sandstone reservoirs in the absence of well log data and evaluating the flow behavior of reservoir fluids within the porous media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先进的机器学习算法,从汞注入毛细管压力数据中预测砂岩储层的渗透率
在没有测井记录和岩心分析数据的情况下确定储层的渗透率是油气行业面临的一项挑战。尽管有 Winland 和 Pittman 等相关数据,但它们往往无法提供准确的渗透率值。本研究利用已发表文献中的注汞毛细管压力数据来确定砂岩储层的渗透率。数据集包括各种汞饱和度(25%、35%、50% 和 75%)下的孔喉半径等参数,以及通过实验室实验确定的渗透率和孔隙度。不同的机器学习技术,即 LASSO 回归、脊回归、支持向量回归 (SVR)、随机森林 (RF) 回归、决策树 (DT) 回归、K-近邻 (KNN) 回归、梯度提升、Ada Boost 和多层感知器 (MLP) 被用于确定渗透率值、孔隙度、孔喉半径和孔喉排序数据。63 个样本被随机分为训练集和测试集,其中 75% 用于训练两个模型,25% 用于测试两个模型。回归系数表明,75% 饱和度时的孔喉半径(r75)对渗透率值的影响最大,其次是孔隙度(phi)和 r50。研究发现,随着学习率的增加,山脊和 LASSO-正态的均方根误差(RMSE)从 48.9208 逐渐减小到 47.2889,而山脊和 LASSO-多项式的均方根误差(RMSE)从 99.97 减小到 52.2629。以往的研究建立了各种模型和相关性,但储层岩石的岩性特征因地点和地下因素而异。本研究的创新之处在于将机器学习模型与注汞毛细管数据相结合,准确预测渗透率,解决了传统相关性的局限性,为在没有测井数据的情况下描述砂岩储层特征以及评估储层流体在多孔介质中的流动行为提供了一种可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Pangea rifting in eastern Arabia—new insights from mafic dikes of the Saih Hatat Dome (Oman Mountains) Application of circular statistics in seasonality analysis of extreme precipitation occurrence time in Urmia Lake basin Digital mapping of soil properties using geomatics: integration of GIS, GPS, and remote sensing applications Tsunami hazard assessment for the Cilegon industrial zone, Java, Indonesia, by considering various digital elevation model (DEM) datasets and fault source models Geochemistry of sediments from the Mugheb River, Bamenda, Cameroon Volcanic Line: implications for provenance, paleoweathering and tectonic setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1