Comparison of Positioning Error Prediction Results of Industrial Robots Based on Three Different Types of Neural Networks

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1002/cpe.8299
Xin Wang
{"title":"Comparison of Positioning Error Prediction Results of Industrial Robots Based on Three Different Types of Neural Networks","authors":"Xin Wang","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With the increasing development of industry, the market demand for manufacturing has shifted to large-scale customized production. This poses new challenges to the production flexibility of industrial robots. The offline programming method can perfectly meet this challenge. But its disadvantage is that it relies heavily on the absolute positioning accuracy of industrial robots. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies using neural networks (NN) to predict the positioning errors of industrial robots to improve their absolute positioning accuracy. However, most of these studies only focus on the application of NNs, and do not compare the prediction results and performance of different kinds of NNs. This paper selects three typical network models: backpropagation neural network (BPNN), particle swarm algorithm optimization BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN). Through in-depth experiments and analysis of these networks, the purpose is to reveal their respective prediction effects and characteristics and to summarize their advantages and disadvantages. Experimental results show that BPNN performs poorly in predicting positioning errors. As an optimization method, the particle swarm algorithm can effectively improve the prediction performance of BPNN. In contrast, the RBFNN performs well, which makes it very suitable for predicting the positioning error of industrial robots.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing development of industry, the market demand for manufacturing has shifted to large-scale customized production. This poses new challenges to the production flexibility of industrial robots. The offline programming method can perfectly meet this challenge. But its disadvantage is that it relies heavily on the absolute positioning accuracy of industrial robots. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of studies using neural networks (NN) to predict the positioning errors of industrial robots to improve their absolute positioning accuracy. However, most of these studies only focus on the application of NNs, and do not compare the prediction results and performance of different kinds of NNs. This paper selects three typical network models: backpropagation neural network (BPNN), particle swarm algorithm optimization BPNN (PSO-BPNN), and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN). Through in-depth experiments and analysis of these networks, the purpose is to reveal their respective prediction effects and characteristics and to summarize their advantages and disadvantages. Experimental results show that BPNN performs poorly in predicting positioning errors. As an optimization method, the particle swarm algorithm can effectively improve the prediction performance of BPNN. In contrast, the RBFNN performs well, which makes it very suitable for predicting the positioning error of industrial robots.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于三种不同类型神经网络的工业机器人定位误差预测结果比较
随着工业的日益发展,市场对制造业的需求已转向大规模定制生产。这对工业机器人的生产灵活性提出了新的挑战。离线编程法完全可以应对这一挑战。但其缺点是严重依赖工业机器人的绝对定位精度。近年来,越来越多的研究利用神经网络(NN)来预测工业机器人的定位误差,以提高其绝对定位精度。然而,这些研究大多只关注 NN 的应用,并没有比较不同类型 NN 的预测结果和性能。本文选择了三种典型的网络模型:反向传播神经网络(BPNN)、粒子群算法优化 BPNN(PSO-BPNN)和径向基函数神经网络(RBFN)。通过对这些网络的深入实验和分析,旨在揭示它们各自的预测效果和特点,总结它们的优缺点。实验结果表明,BPNN 在预测定位误差方面表现较差。作为一种优化方法,粒子群算法能有效提高 BPNN 的预测性能。相比之下,RBFNN 性能良好,非常适合预测工业机器人的定位误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A Multi-Workflow Scheduling Approach With Explicit Evolutionary Multi-Objective Multi-Task Optimization Algorithm in Cloud Environment Measuring Thread Timing to Assess the Feasibility of Early-Bird Message Delivery Across Systems and Scales Issue Information Analysis and Fuzzy Neural Networks-Based Inertia Coefficient Adjustment Strategy of Power Converters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1