Letter: Using non-invasive fibrosis tests and emerging diagnostics to enhance the accuracy of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD patients

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/apt.18223
Wenjun Meng, Ping Yao, Yuan Dan
{"title":"Letter: Using non-invasive fibrosis tests and emerging diagnostics to enhance the accuracy of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD patients","authors":"Wenjun Meng,&nbsp;Ping Yao,&nbsp;Yuan Dan","doi":"10.1111/apt.18223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We have perused with intrigue the recent article by McPherson et al., which appraises the efficacy of non-invasive fibrosis tests (NITs) for staging liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).<span><sup>1</sup></span> The study's concentration on the congruence between clinician fibrosis assessment and histology is particularly meritorious, as it addresses a significant facet of clinical practice in hepatology.</p><p>The research furnishes compelling evidence that algorithmic approaches to staging fibrosis, especially the sequential application of structured NITs, might offer greater precision than the less structured evaluations made by experienced hepatologists. This finding emphasizes the potential for enhanced clinical decision-making and patient management in the context of MASLD.</p><p>However, we opine that there are additional contemplations that warrant further exploration. First and foremost, histology is indeed a trustworthy reference standard for NITs, but dissimilar pathologists, diverse detection methods and distinct instruments may also influence the histological outcomes, and thereby impact the results of the study. Second, the paper alludes to some limitations of NITs, such as the higher false-positive rate of FIB-4 in the elderly, which can be probed in greater depth and possible solutions or alternatives proposed.</p><p>Furthermore, the potential influence of emerging diagnostic technologies on the findings presented in the study should not be disregarded. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 and dedicator of cytokinesis 8 have been identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers for MASLD progression.<span><sup>2</sup></span> As the domain of hepatology keeps evolving, it is pivotal to assess how new tools may complement or challenge current practices.</p><p>In conclusion, the work by McPherson et al. provides a valuable contribution to our comprehension of NITs in the assessment of liver fibrosis. We anticipate that the insights gained from this study will inform future research and clinical guidelines, ultimately enhancing the care of patients with MASLD.</p><p><b>Wenjun Meng:</b> Conceptualization; writing – original draft. <b>Ping Yao:</b> Conceptualization; writing – original draft. <b>Yuan Dan:</b> Conceptualization; writing – original draft.</p><p>None.</p><p>The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.</p><p>This article is linked to McPherson et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18061.</p>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"61 1","pages":"212-213"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apt.18223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.18223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have perused with intrigue the recent article by McPherson et al., which appraises the efficacy of non-invasive fibrosis tests (NITs) for staging liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).1 The study's concentration on the congruence between clinician fibrosis assessment and histology is particularly meritorious, as it addresses a significant facet of clinical practice in hepatology.

The research furnishes compelling evidence that algorithmic approaches to staging fibrosis, especially the sequential application of structured NITs, might offer greater precision than the less structured evaluations made by experienced hepatologists. This finding emphasizes the potential for enhanced clinical decision-making and patient management in the context of MASLD.

However, we opine that there are additional contemplations that warrant further exploration. First and foremost, histology is indeed a trustworthy reference standard for NITs, but dissimilar pathologists, diverse detection methods and distinct instruments may also influence the histological outcomes, and thereby impact the results of the study. Second, the paper alludes to some limitations of NITs, such as the higher false-positive rate of FIB-4 in the elderly, which can be probed in greater depth and possible solutions or alternatives proposed.

Furthermore, the potential influence of emerging diagnostic technologies on the findings presented in the study should not be disregarded. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 and dedicator of cytokinesis 8 have been identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers for MASLD progression.2 As the domain of hepatology keeps evolving, it is pivotal to assess how new tools may complement or challenge current practices.

In conclusion, the work by McPherson et al. provides a valuable contribution to our comprehension of NITs in the assessment of liver fibrosis. We anticipate that the insights gained from this study will inform future research and clinical guidelines, ultimately enhancing the care of patients with MASLD.

Wenjun Meng: Conceptualization; writing – original draft. Ping Yao: Conceptualization; writing – original draft. Yuan Dan: Conceptualization; writing – original draft.

None.

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

This article is linked to McPherson et al paper. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18061.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信:利用无创肝纤维化检测和新兴诊断技术提高 MASLD 患者肝纤维化分期的准确性。
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了McPherson等人最近发表的一篇文章,该文章评估了非侵入性纤维化试验(NITs)对代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)患者肝纤维化分期的疗效该研究集中在临床医生纤维化评估和组织学之间的一致性上,这是特别值得称赞的,因为它解决了肝病学临床实践的一个重要方面。该研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明纤维化分期的算法方法,特别是结构化nit的顺序应用,可能比经验丰富的肝病学家进行的非结构化评估提供更高的精度。这一发现强调了在MASLD背景下加强临床决策和患者管理的潜力。然而,我们认为还有其他考虑值得进一步探讨。首先,组织学确实是一个值得信赖的nit参考标准,但不同的病理学家,不同的检测方法和不同的仪器也可能影响组织学结果,从而影响研究结果。其次,本文暗示了NITs的一些局限性,如FIB-4在老年人中假阳性率较高,可以更深入地探讨,并提出可能的解决方案或替代方案。此外,新兴诊断技术对研究结果的潜在影响不应被忽视。C-X-C基序趋化因子受体4和细胞分裂专用因子8已被确定为MASLD进展的潜在诊断生物标志物2随着肝病学领域的不断发展,评估新工具如何补充或挑战现有做法至关重要。总之,McPherson等人的工作为我们理解nit在肝纤维化评估中的作用提供了宝贵的贡献。我们期望从这项研究中获得的见解将为未来的研究和临床指南提供信息,最终提高对MASLD患者的护理。文俊b孟:概念化;写作-原稿。姚平:概念化;写作-原稿。袁丹:概念化;无,作者无利益冲突需要披露。这篇文章链接到McPherson等人的论文。要查看本文,请访问https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.18061。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
期刊最新文献
Letter: Intestinal Ultrasound-Prioritising Progress. Letter: Attempted Validation of Villin-1 as a Gut Barrier Marker in Decompensated Cirrhosis-Potential Confounding by Tubular Injury and Aetiology. Letter: Does Serum HBV RNA Add Incremental Value for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Stratification Beyond Established Predictors? Letter: Early Inflammatory Benefit Is Not Yet Equivalent to Durable Surgical Advantage After Colectomy in Colonic Crohn's Disease. Authors' Reply. Letter: Does Serum HBV RNA Add Incremental Value for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Stratification Beyond Established Predictors? Authors' Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1