Establishing Research Priorities in Geriatric Nephrology: A Delphi Study of Clinicians and Researchers.

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Kidney Diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.09.012
Catherine R Butler, Akanksha Nalatwad, Katharine L Cheung, Mary F Hannan, Melissa D Hladek, Emily A Johnston, Laura Kimberly, Christine K Liu, Devika Nair, Semra Ozdemir, Fahad Saeed, Jennifer S Scherer, Dorry L Segev, Anoop Sheshadri, Karthik K Tennankore, Tiffany R Washington, Dawn Wolfgram, Nidhi Ghildayal, Rasheeda Hall, Mara McAdams-DeMarco
{"title":"Establishing Research Priorities in Geriatric Nephrology: A Delphi Study of Clinicians and Researchers.","authors":"Catherine R Butler, Akanksha Nalatwad, Katharine L Cheung, Mary F Hannan, Melissa D Hladek, Emily A Johnston, Laura Kimberly, Christine K Liu, Devika Nair, Semra Ozdemir, Fahad Saeed, Jennifer S Scherer, Dorry L Segev, Anoop Sheshadri, Karthik K Tennankore, Tiffany R Washington, Dawn Wolfgram, Nidhi Ghildayal, Rasheeda Hall, Mara McAdams-DeMarco","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>Despite substantial growth in the population of older adults with kidney disease, there remains a lack of evidence to guide clinical care for this group. The Kidney Disease and Aging Research Collaborative (KDARC) conducted a Delphi study to build consensus on research priorities for clinical geriatric nephrology.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Asynchronous modified Delphi study.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>Clinicians and researchers in the US and Canada with clinical experience and/or research expertise in geriatric nephrology.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Research priorities in geriatric nephrology.</p><p><strong>Analytical approach: </strong>In the first Delphi round, participants submitted free-text descriptions of research priorities considered important for improving the clinical care of older adults with kidney disease. Delphi moderators used inductive content analysis to group concepts into categories. In the second and third rounds, participants iteratively reviewed topics, selected their top 5 priorities, and offered comments used to revise categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 121 who were invited, 57 participants (47%) completed the first Delphi round and 48 (84% of enrolled participants) completed all rounds. After 3 rounds, the 5 priorities with the highest proportion of agreement were: 1) Communication and Decision-Making about Treatment Options for Older Adults with Kidney Failure (69% agreement), 2) Quality of Life, Symptom Management, and Palliative Care (67%), 3) Frailty and Physical Function (54%), 4) Tailoring Therapies for Kidney Disease to Specific Needs of Older Adults (42%), and 5) Caregiver and Social Support (35%). Health equity and person-centricity were identified as cross-cutting features that informed all topics.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Relatively low response rate and limited participation by private practitioners and older clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experts in geriatric nephrology identified clinical research priorities with the greatest potential to improve care for older adults with kidney disease. These findings provide a roadmap for the geriatric nephrology community to harmonize and maximize the impact of research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.09.012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & objective: Despite substantial growth in the population of older adults with kidney disease, there remains a lack of evidence to guide clinical care for this group. The Kidney Disease and Aging Research Collaborative (KDARC) conducted a Delphi study to build consensus on research priorities for clinical geriatric nephrology.

Study design: Asynchronous modified Delphi study.

Setting & participants: Clinicians and researchers in the US and Canada with clinical experience and/or research expertise in geriatric nephrology.

Outcome: Research priorities in geriatric nephrology.

Analytical approach: In the first Delphi round, participants submitted free-text descriptions of research priorities considered important for improving the clinical care of older adults with kidney disease. Delphi moderators used inductive content analysis to group concepts into categories. In the second and third rounds, participants iteratively reviewed topics, selected their top 5 priorities, and offered comments used to revise categories.

Results: Among 121 who were invited, 57 participants (47%) completed the first Delphi round and 48 (84% of enrolled participants) completed all rounds. After 3 rounds, the 5 priorities with the highest proportion of agreement were: 1) Communication and Decision-Making about Treatment Options for Older Adults with Kidney Failure (69% agreement), 2) Quality of Life, Symptom Management, and Palliative Care (67%), 3) Frailty and Physical Function (54%), 4) Tailoring Therapies for Kidney Disease to Specific Needs of Older Adults (42%), and 5) Caregiver and Social Support (35%). Health equity and person-centricity were identified as cross-cutting features that informed all topics.

Limitations: Relatively low response rate and limited participation by private practitioners and older clinicians and researchers.

Conclusions: Experts in geriatric nephrology identified clinical research priorities with the greatest potential to improve care for older adults with kidney disease. These findings provide a roadmap for the geriatric nephrology community to harmonize and maximize the impact of research efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定老年肾脏病学的研究重点:临床医生和研究人员的德尔菲研究。
理由和目标:尽管患有肾脏疾病的老年人口大幅增长,但仍缺乏指导该群体临床治疗的证据。肾脏疾病与老龄化研究合作组织(KDARC)开展了一项德尔菲研究,旨在就老年肾脏病学临床研究的重点达成共识:异步改良德尔菲研究:环境和参与者:美国和加拿大具有老年肾脏病学临床经验和/或研究专长的临床医生和研究人员:分析方法:分析方法:在第一轮德尔菲讨论中,参与者提交了对改善老年肾病患者临床护理非常重要的研究重点的自由文本描述。德尔菲主持人使用归纳式内容分析法对概念进行分类。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者反复审查主题,选出他们认为最重要的 5 个优先事项,并提出意见用于修改类别:在 121 位受邀者中,57 位参与者(47%)完成了第一轮德尔菲讨论,48 位参与者(占报名参与者的 84%)完成了所有讨论。经过三轮讨论,达成一致意见比例最高的 5 个优先事项是1)肾衰竭老年人治疗方案的沟通和决策(69%),2)生活质量、症状管理和姑息治疗(67%),3)虚弱和身体功能(54%),4)根据老年人的特殊需求调整肾病治疗方法(42%),5)护理人员和社会支持(35%)。健康公平和以人为本被认为是贯穿所有主题的特征:局限性:回复率相对较低,私人执业医师、老年临床医师和研究人员的参与度有限:老年肾脏病学专家确定了最有可能改善老年肾脏病患者护理的临床研究重点。这些发现为老年肾脏病学界提供了一个路线图,以协调研究工作并使其发挥最大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
期刊最新文献
Establishing Research Priorities in Geriatric Nephrology: A Delphi Study of Clinicians and Researchers. ACGME Accreditation for Transplant Nephrology Training: Clarifying Why This is a Step in the Right Direction. Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Acute Kidney Injury Incidence Following Intravenous Antihypertensive Administration for Severe Blood Pressure Elevation During Hospitalization. Masthead Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1