Intake and Nutritional Adequacy in Patients with Cancer Diagnosed with Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.011
Cynthia A Thomson, Kathryn B Arnold, Garnet Anderson, Virginia Sun, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Angela Yung, Mazin Al-Kasspooles, Valentine N Nfonsam, Marcia Grant, Gary B Deutsch, Jeremiah L Deneve, Robert S Krouse
{"title":"Intake and Nutritional Adequacy in Patients with Cancer Diagnosed with Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.","authors":"Cynthia A Thomson, Kathryn B Arnold, Garnet Anderson, Virginia Sun, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Angela Yung, Mazin Al-Kasspooles, Valentine N Nfonsam, Marcia Grant, Gary B Deutsch, Jeremiah L Deneve, Robert S Krouse","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is experienced by many with advanced cancer. Patients with MBO cannot eat and may have reduced ability to eat once the acute process has resolved. Sparse data exist to describe oral intake capacity and adequacy of nutrition in MBO patients. These data are critical to developing effective supportive care nutrition therapy for patients with MBO.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the ability to consume food/liquids orally estimating nutritional adequacy of diet in a sample of patients who received surgical or non-surgical treatment for MBO.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive secondary data analysis of repeated dietary intake measures from S1316, a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of surgical and non-surgical treatment for MBO. Participant enrollment occurred between 2015 and 2020. Ability to eat was assessed through self-reported telephone survey and intake was estimated using telephone-based 24-hour recalls, applying USDA multi-pass methodology.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>The primary trial was conducted within the SWOG Cancer Research Network and included recruitment sites across the U.S. and Latin America. Eligible participants were diagnosed with, and hospitalized for, MBO.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The main outcomes measures were self- or caregiver reported ability to eat, as well as overall nutrient intake.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Descriptive statistics were used to report patient characteristics, intake, and nutrient adequacy. Nutrient intake was presented by tertiles of gastrointestinal symptom severity and assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>221 participants were registered; 199 were eligible and included. At Week 1, 51% of patients with MBO reported consuming some solid food orally; 34% reported no oral intake; 13% were on enteral feeding only. For patients alive and responsive to recalls at 13 weeks (n=57), 82% (n=47) reported consuming solid food. Compared to recommendations, mean reported intake was inadequate for most nutrients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral intake is reported in more than half of patients diagnosed with MBO. Medical nutrition therapy should be tailored to patients' tolerance for eating and with consideration or patient's desire to address nutritional inadequacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.11.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is experienced by many with advanced cancer. Patients with MBO cannot eat and may have reduced ability to eat once the acute process has resolved. Sparse data exist to describe oral intake capacity and adequacy of nutrition in MBO patients. These data are critical to developing effective supportive care nutrition therapy for patients with MBO.

Objective: To describe the ability to consume food/liquids orally estimating nutritional adequacy of diet in a sample of patients who received surgical or non-surgical treatment for MBO.

Design: A descriptive secondary data analysis of repeated dietary intake measures from S1316, a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of surgical and non-surgical treatment for MBO. Participant enrollment occurred between 2015 and 2020. Ability to eat was assessed through self-reported telephone survey and intake was estimated using telephone-based 24-hour recalls, applying USDA multi-pass methodology.

Participants/setting: The primary trial was conducted within the SWOG Cancer Research Network and included recruitment sites across the U.S. and Latin America. Eligible participants were diagnosed with, and hospitalized for, MBO.

Main outcome measures: The main outcomes measures were self- or caregiver reported ability to eat, as well as overall nutrient intake.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to report patient characteristics, intake, and nutrient adequacy. Nutrient intake was presented by tertiles of gastrointestinal symptom severity and assessed.

Results: 221 participants were registered; 199 were eligible and included. At Week 1, 51% of patients with MBO reported consuming some solid food orally; 34% reported no oral intake; 13% were on enteral feeding only. For patients alive and responsive to recalls at 13 weeks (n=57), 82% (n=47) reported consuming solid food. Compared to recommendations, mean reported intake was inadequate for most nutrients.

Conclusions: Oral intake is reported in more than half of patients diagnosed with MBO. Medical nutrition therapy should be tailored to patients' tolerance for eating and with consideration or patient's desire to address nutritional inadequacies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被诊断为恶性肠梗阻的癌症患者的摄入量和营养充足性:随机试验的二次分析。
背景:许多晚期癌症患者都会出现恶性肠梗阻(MBO)。恶性肠梗阻患者不能进食,而且一旦急性病程缓解,进食能力也会下降。描述 MBO 患者口腔摄入能力和营养充足性的数据很少。这些数据对于为 MBO 患者开发有效的支持性护理营养疗法至关重要:描述在接受手术或非手术治疗的 MBO 患者样本中口服食物/液体的能力,以估计饮食的营养充足性:对 S1316 重复饮食摄入量进行描述性二次数据分析,S1316 是一项针对 MBO 手术和非手术治疗的实用比较有效性试验。参与者注册时间为 2015 年至 2020 年。进食能力通过自我报告的电话调查进行评估,摄入量通过基于电话的 24 小时回忆进行估算,并采用美国农业部的多通道方法:主要试验在 SWOG 癌症研究网络内进行,招募地点遍及美国和拉丁美洲。符合条件的参与者被诊断出患有MBO并因此住院:主要结果测量指标为自我或护理人员报告的进食能力以及总体营养摄入量:描述性统计用于报告患者特征、摄入量和营养素充足性。结果:221 名参与者进行了登记;199 名符合条件并被纳入。在第 1 周,51% 的 MBO 患者称口服了一些固体食物;34% 的患者称没有口服食物;13% 的患者仅靠肠内喂养。在 13 周时存活并对召回做出反应的患者(57 人)中,82%(47 人)报告摄入了固体食物。与推荐值相比,大多数营养素的平均报告摄入量不足:结论:半数以上确诊为 MBO 的患者报告了口服摄入量。医学营养疗法应根据患者对进食的耐受性量身定制,并考虑患者解决营养不足问题的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
期刊最新文献
Association between Ultra-processed Food Consumption And Mortality among U.S. Adults: Prospective Cohort Study of the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2018. Intake and Nutritional Adequacy in Patients with Cancer Diagnosed with Malignant Bowel Obstruction: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Longer WIC participation is associated with higher diet quality and consumption of WIC-eligible foods among children 2-5 years old. Table of Contents December 2024 Sites in Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1