Defining quality categories for evaluation of the doctor-patient relationship assessed through the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9).

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Family practice Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmae068
Lucas Wollmann, Lisiane Hauser, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Rudi Roman, Milena Rodrigues Agostinho Rech, Erno Harzheim
{"title":"Defining quality categories for evaluation of the doctor-patient relationship assessed through the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9).","authors":"Lucas Wollmann, Lisiane Hauser, Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Rudi Roman, Milena Rodrigues Agostinho Rech, Erno Harzheim","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of the doctor-patient relationship plays a crucial role in patients' experiences with healthcare services, positively influencing clinical outcomes and satisfaction with care. The Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) is widely used to assess this relationship. However, there are no quality categories that can be derived from the instrument's score to facilitate understanding and decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to establish categories of the quality of the relationship based on the PDRQ-9 score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted using interviews with 6160 users of primary health care units throughout Brazil to define different homogeneous response profiles. The Youden index was used to determine the cut point between classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LCA identified the presence of two response profiles, one associated with a high evaluation of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship and another associated with a moderate evaluation. The cut point between classes, established through the Youden index, was 3.5 (on a possible score range of 1-5) or 31 (on a possible score range of 9-45). The cut point demonstrated high accuracy (0.94), sensitivity (0.96), and specificity (0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The categorization proposed in this study enhances the interpretability of PDRQ-9 results, providing a practical framework for assessing the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. By establishing actionable quality categories, this tool could support targeted interventions, such as performance feedback and training, aimed at fostering empathy, communication, and trust in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The quality of the doctor-patient relationship plays a crucial role in patients' experiences with healthcare services, positively influencing clinical outcomes and satisfaction with care. The Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) is widely used to assess this relationship. However, there are no quality categories that can be derived from the instrument's score to facilitate understanding and decision-making.

Objectives: This study aims to establish categories of the quality of the relationship based on the PDRQ-9 score.

Methods: A latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted using interviews with 6160 users of primary health care units throughout Brazil to define different homogeneous response profiles. The Youden index was used to determine the cut point between classes.

Results: LCA identified the presence of two response profiles, one associated with a high evaluation of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship and another associated with a moderate evaluation. The cut point between classes, established through the Youden index, was 3.5 (on a possible score range of 1-5) or 31 (on a possible score range of 9-45). The cut point demonstrated high accuracy (0.94), sensitivity (0.96), and specificity (0.98).

Conclusions: The categorization proposed in this study enhances the interpretability of PDRQ-9 results, providing a practical framework for assessing the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. By establishing actionable quality categories, this tool could support targeted interventions, such as performance feedback and training, aimed at fostering empathy, communication, and trust in healthcare settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定通过医患关系问卷(PDRQ-9)评估医患关系的质量类别。
背景:医患关系的质量对患者的医疗保健服务体验起着至关重要的作用,并对临床结果和护理满意度产生积极影响。医患关系问卷(PDRQ-9)被广泛用于评估这种关系。然而,目前还没有可从该问卷得分中得出的质量类别,以便于理解和决策:本研究旨在根据 PDRQ-9 的得分确定关系质量的类别:方法:通过对巴西全国 6160 名初级卫生保健单位用户的访谈,进行了潜类分析(LCA),以确定不同的同质反应特征。结果:潜类分析确定了两种反应特征:结果:LCA 确定了两种反应特征,一种与对医患关系质量的高度评价相关,另一种与中度评价相关。通过尤登指数(Youden index)确定的等级之间的分界点为 3.5(可能得分范围为 1-5)或 31(可能得分范围为 9-45)。切点的准确度(0.94)、灵敏度(0.96)和特异度(0.98)都很高:本研究提出的分类方法提高了 PDRQ-9 结果的可解释性,为评估医患关系的质量提供了一个实用的框架。通过建立可操作的质量类别,该工具可支持有针对性的干预措施,如绩效反馈和培训,旨在促进医疗机构中的同理心、沟通和信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Defining quality categories for evaluation of the doctor-patient relationship assessed through the patient-doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ-9). Variation in general practitioners' follow-up of depressed patients starting antidepressant medication: a register-based cohort study. "Evolution of a combined baccalaureate/medical degree program as a pipeline to primary care: retention strategies and lessons learned". Proper counseling for diagnosis and management of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: a case report. The presentation and treatment of Dupuytren's disease in Dutch general practitioner care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1