The reproducibility of protocols used to mediate a current-induced vasodilation in the human cutaneous microcirculation.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314430
Alicia Guigui, Léa Liaigre, Matthieu Roustit, Jordan Loader
{"title":"The reproducibility of protocols used to mediate a current-induced vasodilation in the human cutaneous microcirculation.","authors":"Alicia Guigui, Léa Liaigre, Matthieu Roustit, Jordan Loader","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current-induced vasodilation (CIV) can be used to assess the prostacyclin (PGI2) pathway. This study, for the first time, evaluated the reproducibility of several protocols used to mediate a CIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three CIV protocols were evaluated in 10 healthy participants who completed four testing sessions. Two testing sessions were conducted on the calf, separated by a period of seven days allowing interday reproducibility to be assessed. Two testing sessions were also conducted seven days apart on the forearm. At each testing session, cutaneous microvascular assessments were conducted for one hour on the right limb of interest before assessments were immediately performed on the left limb, allowing for intersite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Assessments were then repeated at the same site on the right limb, allowing for intrasite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Reproducibility was assessed using the within-subject coefficients of variation and the intra-class correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol A (Pulses of 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, and 0.18 mA for 10 s each; 60 s intervals), Protocol B (0.1 mA for 60 s), and Protocol C (2 pulses of 0.1 mA for 10s each; 240 s interval) had good to excellent interday reproducibility for calf and forearm assessments. The intrasite, intraday reproducibility of each protocol was less clear. Intersite testing didn't improve intraday reproducibility. Reproducibility was consistently unacceptable when the microvascular response to the electrical stimulation was expressed as the absolute change and the percentage change between baseline values and the maximal plateau. A microvascular response wasn't induced ∼10% of assessments on either the calf or forearm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that a CIV is most reproducible with interday testing and when data are expressed as the maximal plateau in perfusion units or as cutaneous vascular conductance, and as the area under the curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0314430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314430","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current-induced vasodilation (CIV) can be used to assess the prostacyclin (PGI2) pathway. This study, for the first time, evaluated the reproducibility of several protocols used to mediate a CIV.

Methods: Three CIV protocols were evaluated in 10 healthy participants who completed four testing sessions. Two testing sessions were conducted on the calf, separated by a period of seven days allowing interday reproducibility to be assessed. Two testing sessions were also conducted seven days apart on the forearm. At each testing session, cutaneous microvascular assessments were conducted for one hour on the right limb of interest before assessments were immediately performed on the left limb, allowing for intersite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Assessments were then repeated at the same site on the right limb, allowing for intrasite, intraday reproducibility to be evaluated. Reproducibility was assessed using the within-subject coefficients of variation and the intra-class correlation coefficients.

Results: Protocol A (Pulses of 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, and 0.18 mA for 10 s each; 60 s intervals), Protocol B (0.1 mA for 60 s), and Protocol C (2 pulses of 0.1 mA for 10s each; 240 s interval) had good to excellent interday reproducibility for calf and forearm assessments. The intrasite, intraday reproducibility of each protocol was less clear. Intersite testing didn't improve intraday reproducibility. Reproducibility was consistently unacceptable when the microvascular response to the electrical stimulation was expressed as the absolute change and the percentage change between baseline values and the maximal plateau. A microvascular response wasn't induced ∼10% of assessments on either the calf or forearm.

Conclusions: This study indicates that a CIV is most reproducible with interday testing and when data are expressed as the maximal plateau in perfusion units or as cutaneous vascular conductance, and as the area under the curve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于调解电流诱导的人体皮肤微循环血管扩张的方案的可重复性。
简介:电流诱导血管扩张(CIV)可用于评估前列环素(PGI2)途径。本研究首次评估了用于介导 CIV 的几种方案的可重复性:方法:10 名健康参与者完成了四次测试,对三种 CIV 方案进行了评估。对小牛进行了两次测试,每次测试间隔七天,以便评估日间重现性。前臂也进行了两次测试,每次间隔七天。在每次测试过程中,先在右侧肢体上进行一小时的皮肤微血管评估,然后立即在左侧肢体上进行评估,以评估部位间和日内的重现性。然后在右侧肢体的同一部位重复评估,以评估部位内和日内的再现性。重现性使用受试者内变异系数和类内相关系数进行评估:结果:方案 A(脉冲为 0.03、0.06、0.09、0.12、0.15 和 0.18 毫安,各持续 10 秒;间隔 60 秒)、方案 B(0.1 毫安,持续 60 秒)和方案 C(2 个脉冲为 0.1 毫安,各持续 10 秒;间隔 240 秒)在小腿和前臂评估方面的日间重现性良好至极佳。每种方案的站内、日内重现性则不太明显。站内测试并不能提高日内重现性。如果用基线值和最大高原之间的绝对变化和百分比变化来表示电刺激的微血管反应,重现性始终是不可接受的。在对小腿或前臂的评估中,有 10% 的微血管反应没有被诱发:这项研究表明,CIV 在进行跨日测试、以灌注单位的最大平台值或皮肤血管传导率以及曲线下面积表示数据时,可重复性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Elucidating the monoamine oxidase B inhibitory effect of kaurene diterpenoids from Xylopia aethiopica: An in silico approach. The relationship between proactive personality and college students' short-form video addiction: A chain mediation model of resilience and self-control. Experiences and perspectives on rapid-test diagnosis of tuberculosis, histoplasmosis and cryptococcosis in people with advanced HIV/AIDS disease in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Exploring attitudes to decolonising the science curriculum-A UK Higher Education case study. The reproducibility of protocols used to mediate a current-induced vasodilation in the human cutaneous microcirculation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1