Patient Characteristics and Practice Variation Associated With New Community Prescription of Benzodiazepine and z-Drug Hypnotics After Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pds.70056
Elizabeth T Mansi, Christopher T Rentsch, Richard S Bourne, Bruce Guthrie, Nazir I Lone
{"title":"Patient Characteristics and Practice Variation Associated With New Community Prescription of Benzodiazepine and z-Drug Hypnotics After Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.","authors":"Elizabeth T Mansi, Christopher T Rentsch, Richard S Bourne, Bruce Guthrie, Nazir I Lone","doi":"10.1002/pds.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Survivors of critical illness are often affected by new or worsened mental health conditions and sleep disorders. We examined the incidence, practice variation and factors associated with new benzodiazepine and z-drug community prescriptions among critical illness survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data included 52 846 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018 who were not prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs before hospitalisation. We performed multilevel multivariable logistic regression to assess patient factors associated with new (any prescription within 90 days) and with new-and-persistent (2+ prescriptions within 180 days) benzodiazepine or z-drug prescribing, and to evaluate variation by primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5.2% (2769/52846) of treatment-naïve survivors (95% CI 5.1-5.4) were prescribed a benzodiazepine or z-drug, and 2.5% (1311/52846) had new-and-persistent prescribing. A history of insomnia (adjusted OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.74-2.21), anxiety or depression (adjusted OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.28-1.53) and recent prescription opioid use (adjusted OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.34-1.61) were associated with new community prescription. Sex was not associated with new prescriptions and older patients were less likely to receive a prescription. 2.6% of the variation in new prescribing and 4.1% of the variation in new-and-persistent prescribing were attributable to the prescribing practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in twenty critical illness survivors receive a new community benzodiazepine or z-drug prescription. Further research is needed to understand where in the patient care pathway initiation occurs and the risk of adverse events in survivors of recent critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 12","pages":"e70056"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Survivors of critical illness are often affected by new or worsened mental health conditions and sleep disorders. We examined the incidence, practice variation and factors associated with new benzodiazepine and z-drug community prescriptions among critical illness survivors.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data included 52 846 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018 who were not prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs before hospitalisation. We performed multilevel multivariable logistic regression to assess patient factors associated with new (any prescription within 90 days) and with new-and-persistent (2+ prescriptions within 180 days) benzodiazepine or z-drug prescribing, and to evaluate variation by primary care practice.

Results: 5.2% (2769/52846) of treatment-naïve survivors (95% CI 5.1-5.4) were prescribed a benzodiazepine or z-drug, and 2.5% (1311/52846) had new-and-persistent prescribing. A history of insomnia (adjusted OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.74-2.21), anxiety or depression (adjusted OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.28-1.53) and recent prescription opioid use (adjusted OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.34-1.61) were associated with new community prescription. Sex was not associated with new prescriptions and older patients were less likely to receive a prescription. 2.6% of the variation in new prescribing and 4.1% of the variation in new-and-persistent prescribing were attributable to the prescribing practice.

Conclusions: One in twenty critical illness survivors receive a new community benzodiazepine or z-drug prescription. Further research is needed to understand where in the patient care pathway initiation occurs and the risk of adverse events in survivors of recent critical illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重病人在社区开具苯二氮卓类药物和 z 类催眠药新处方时的患者特征和实践差异:利用英国临床实践研究数据链接进行的回顾性队列研究》。
目的:危重病幸存者通常会受到新的或恶化的精神健康状况和睡眠障碍的影响。我们研究了危重病幸存者中新增苯二氮卓类药物和z类药物社区处方的发生率、实践差异和相关因素:一项使用英国临床实践研究数据链数据进行的回顾性队列研究纳入了 2010 年至 2018 年住院的 52 846 名成年危重病幸存者,他们在住院前未被开具苯二氮卓类药物或 Z 类药物处方。我们进行了多层次多变量逻辑回归,以评估与新处方(90天内的任何处方)和新且持续处方(180天内的2个以上处方)苯二氮卓类药物或z类药物相关的患者因素,并评估初级保健实践的差异:5.2%(2769/52846)的未接受过治疗的幸存者(95% CI 5.1-5.4)被开具了苯二氮杂卓或z类药物处方,2.5%(1311/52846)的幸存者被开具了新的和持续性处方。失眠病史(调整后 OR 1.96;95% CI 1.74-2.21)、焦虑或抑郁(调整后 OR 1.40;95% CI 1.28-1.53)以及近期使用处方阿片类药物(调整后 OR 1.47;95% CI 1.34-1.61)与社区新处方相关。性别与新处方无关,年龄较大的患者获得处方的可能性较低。2.6%的新处方变化和4.1%的新处方-持续处方变化可归因于处方实践:每 20 名危重病幸存者中就有 1 人收到新的社区苯二氮卓类药物或 Z 类药物处方。需要开展进一步的研究,以了解患者护理路径的起始点以及近期危重病幸存者发生不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Lookback Duration on the Performance of a Claims-Based Frailty Proxy in Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer. Impact of Pharmacovigilance Interventions Targeting Fluoroquinolones on Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Successful Linkage of Electronic Medical Records and National Health Data System in Type 2 Diabetes Research: Methodological Insights and Implications. Use of Potentially Nephrotoxic Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on SGLT2i: A Trajectories Analysis. Lessons Learned From Characterizing Long COVID Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1