Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-11-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S489640
Esther Jie Tian, Priya Martin, Lewis A Ingram, Saravana Kumar
{"title":"Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review.","authors":"Esther Jie Tian, Priya Martin, Lewis A Ingram, Saravana Kumar","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S489640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to synthesize contemporary evidence on effectiveness of community-based allied health (AH) services on acute care utilizations and views from relevant stakeholders. An a priori protocol was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42023437013]. Inclusion criteria were: (a) stand-alone interventions led by practitioners/graduates from one or more target AH professions (audiology, exercise physiology, diabetes educator, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, social work, and speech pathology); (b) examined acute care utilization-related outcomes with/without perceptions of relevant stakeholders; and (c) published after 2010 and in English. Eligible studies were identified from: (a) bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, PsycINFO, CINAHL complete, and the Cochrane Library) (September 19, 2023); (b) online databases (ProQuest Central and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) and theses repository (Trove) (September 20, 2023); (c) Google and Google Scholar (October 17-18, 2023); and (d) citation searching. A modified version of McMaster Critical Appraisal Tools and McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to assess methodological quality. Data synthesis was through convergent segregated approach. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. There were 67 included papers. The integrated quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrated mixed evidence, likely influenced by the heterogeneity of the evidence base, for the effectiveness of AH services on acute care utilizations. Patients and their carers were largely positive about these services, highlighting opportunities to build on these experiences. The certainty of evidence for patient-important outcomes was however \"very low\", emphasizing cautious interpretation. The findings of this review shed light on the breadth and scope of AH in the community sector, and its potential impact on the acute sector. Further investment in, and ongoing research on, community-based AH can strengthen primary healthcare and relieve pressure on the acute sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"17 ","pages":"5521-5570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S489640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to synthesize contemporary evidence on effectiveness of community-based allied health (AH) services on acute care utilizations and views from relevant stakeholders. An a priori protocol was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42023437013]. Inclusion criteria were: (a) stand-alone interventions led by practitioners/graduates from one or more target AH professions (audiology, exercise physiology, diabetes educator, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, social work, and speech pathology); (b) examined acute care utilization-related outcomes with/without perceptions of relevant stakeholders; and (c) published after 2010 and in English. Eligible studies were identified from: (a) bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, PsycINFO, CINAHL complete, and the Cochrane Library) (September 19, 2023); (b) online databases (ProQuest Central and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) and theses repository (Trove) (September 20, 2023); (c) Google and Google Scholar (October 17-18, 2023); and (d) citation searching. A modified version of McMaster Critical Appraisal Tools and McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to assess methodological quality. Data synthesis was through convergent segregated approach. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. There were 67 included papers. The integrated quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrated mixed evidence, likely influenced by the heterogeneity of the evidence base, for the effectiveness of AH services on acute care utilizations. Patients and their carers were largely positive about these services, highlighting opportunities to build on these experiences. The certainty of evidence for patient-important outcomes was however "very low", emphasizing cautious interpretation. The findings of this review shed light on the breadth and scope of AH in the community sector, and its potential impact on the acute sector. Further investment in, and ongoing research on, community-based AH can strengthen primary healthcare and relieve pressure on the acute sector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区联合医疗对急症护理使用的效果和利益相关者的看法:混合方法综述》。
本混合方法系统综述旨在综合社区专职医疗(AH)服务对急症护理使用率的有效性的当代证据以及相关利益方的观点。事先已在 PROSPERO [CRD42023437013] 注册了研究方案。纳入标准为(a) 由一个或多个目标 AH 专业(听力学、运动生理学、糖尿病教育学、营养与饮食学、职业疗法、物理疗法、足病学、心理学、社会工作和言语病理学)的从业人员/毕业生领导的独立干预措施;(b) 研究了与急症护理利用率相关的结果,包括/不包括相关利益方的看法;(c) 2010 年以后发表的英文研究。符合条件的研究是从:(a) 文献数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、EmCare、PsycINFO、CINAHL complete 和 Cochrane Library)(2023 年 9 月 19 日);(b) 在线数据库(ProQuest Central 和 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global)和论文库(Trove)(2023 年 9 月 20 日);(c) Google 和 Google Scholar(2023 年 10 月 17-18 日);以及 (d) 引文检索。评估方法质量时使用了麦克马斯特批判性评估工具和麦吉尔混合方法评估工具的修订版。数据综合采用聚合分离法。证据的确定性采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法进行评估。共纳入 67 篇论文。综合定量和定性研究结果表明,可能受证据基础异质性的影响,AH 服务对急症护理使用率的有效性证据不一。患者及其护理人员对这些服务大多持肯定态度,强调了在这些经验基础上再接再厉的机会。然而,对患者重要的结果而言,证据的确定性 "非常低",因此需要谨慎解释。本次审查的结果揭示了社区保健的广度和范围,及其对急诊部门的潜在影响。对社区保健的进一步投资和持续研究可以加强初级医疗保健,缓解急诊部门的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Transformative Approach to the Detection of Prediabetes. Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Genome Variability for the Development of Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Bibliometric Analysis. Mapping the Future: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1