Effect of composite resins with and without fiber-reinforcement on the fracture resistance of teeth with non-carious cervical lesions.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/22808000241303327
Ahmet Hazar, Ecehan Hazar
{"title":"Effect of composite resins with and without fiber-reinforcement on the fracture resistance of teeth with non-carious cervical lesions.","authors":"Ahmet Hazar, Ecehan Hazar","doi":"10.1177/22808000241303327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are commonly observed in clinical dentistry, leading to tooth fractures, sensitivity, and compromised pulp vitality. Therefore, their restoration is essential for both the aesthetic and structural integrity of teeth. This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of NCCLs restored using different materials: an injectable universal composite, flowable bulk-fill composites with or without fiber-reinforcement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-five double-rooted maxillary premolars were selected for the study. Fifteen teeth were left intact as a control. A wedge-shaped cavity was prepared in the cervical region of the remaining sixty teeth, which were then divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 15): unrestored, restored with an injectable composite, restored with a flowable bulk-fill composite (SDR<sup>®</sup> flow+), and restored with a flowable short-fiber-reinforced composite (everX Flow™). All teeth underwent fracture testing under oblique static loading at a 30° angle using a universal testing machine. Fracture patterns were classified as repairable, possibly repairable, or unrepairable. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Pearson chi-square, and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (<i>p</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intact teeth exhibited the highest fracture resistance (743.481 N), while unrestored teeth showed the lowest (371.49 N) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fracture resistance between the injectable composite (553.289 N) and SDR<sup>®</sup> flow+ (497.368 N) (<i>p</i> = 0.055). The everX Flow™ group displayed significantly higher fracture resistance (673.787 N) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and a repairability rate of 60% within the restored groups. Unrestored (60%), injectable composite (53.3%), and SDR<sup>®</sup> flow+ (53.3%) groups were mostly unrepairable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The everX Flow™ demonstrated improved fracture resistance and favorable fracture pattern for maxillary premolars with wedge-shaped NCCLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials","volume":"22 ","pages":"22808000241303327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000241303327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) are commonly observed in clinical dentistry, leading to tooth fractures, sensitivity, and compromised pulp vitality. Therefore, their restoration is essential for both the aesthetic and structural integrity of teeth. This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of NCCLs restored using different materials: an injectable universal composite, flowable bulk-fill composites with or without fiber-reinforcement.

Methods: Seventy-five double-rooted maxillary premolars were selected for the study. Fifteen teeth were left intact as a control. A wedge-shaped cavity was prepared in the cervical region of the remaining sixty teeth, which were then divided into four groups (n = 15): unrestored, restored with an injectable composite, restored with a flowable bulk-fill composite (SDR® flow+), and restored with a flowable short-fiber-reinforced composite (everX Flow™). All teeth underwent fracture testing under oblique static loading at a 30° angle using a universal testing machine. Fracture patterns were classified as repairable, possibly repairable, or unrepairable. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, Pearson chi-square, and Tukey HSD post hoc tests (p = 0.05).

Results: Intact teeth exhibited the highest fracture resistance (743.481 N), while unrestored teeth showed the lowest (371.49 N) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in fracture resistance between the injectable composite (553.289 N) and SDR® flow+ (497.368 N) (p = 0.055). The everX Flow™ group displayed significantly higher fracture resistance (673.787 N) (p < 0.001) and a repairability rate of 60% within the restored groups. Unrestored (60%), injectable composite (53.3%), and SDR® flow+ (53.3%) groups were mostly unrepairable.

Conclusion: The everX Flow™ demonstrated improved fracture resistance and favorable fracture pattern for maxillary premolars with wedge-shaped NCCLs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有纤维加固和无纤维加固的复合树脂对非龋性龋齿牙齿抗折性的影响。
目的:非龋性牙颈部病变(NCCL)是临床牙科常见的病变,会导致牙齿断裂、敏感和牙髓活力受损。因此,为了牙齿的美观和结构的完整性,对其进行修复至关重要。本研究旨在比较使用不同材料修复的 NCCL 的抗折性:可注射的通用复合材料、带或不带纤维加固的可流动的大量填充复合材料:研究选择了 75 颗双根上颌前磨牙。十五颗牙齿作为对照,保持完好无损。在其余六十颗牙齿的牙颈部制备一个楔形空腔,然后将其分为四组(n = 15):未修复组、使用可注射复合材料修复组、使用可流动散装填充复合材料(SDR® flow+)修复组和使用可流动短纤维增强复合材料(everX Flow™)修复组。所有牙齿都使用万能试验机在 30° 角斜静态加载下进行了断裂测试。断裂形态分为可修复、可能修复和不可修复。数据分析采用单因素方差分析、Pearson chi-square和Tukey HSD事后检验(p = 0.05):结果:完好牙齿的抗折力最高(743.481 N),而未修复牙齿的抗折力最低(371.49 N)(p ® flow+ (497.368 N) (p = 0.055))。everX Flow™ 组显示出明显更高的抗折性(673.787 N)(p ® flow+ (53.3%) 组大多无法修复:everX Flow™ 对具有楔形 NCCL 的上颌前磨牙显示出更高的抗折性和良好的折断模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials
Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials (JABFM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal considering the publication of original contributions, reviews and editorials dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of biomaterial sciences and functional materials. The areas covered by the journal will include: • Biomaterials / Materials for biomedical applications • Functional materials • Hybrid and composite materials • Soft materials • Hydrogels • Nanomaterials • Gene delivery • Nonodevices • Metamaterials • Active coatings • Surface functionalization • Tissue engineering • Cell delivery/cell encapsulation systems • 3D printing materials • Material characterization • Biomechanics
期刊最新文献
Influences of multi-pass friction stir alloying on characterization of AZ91D alloy-based dual reinforcement bio-ceramic nano-composites. Silicate-substituted bovine-derived hydroxyapatite as a bone substitute in regenerative dentistry. Cranioplasty infection in porous hydroxyapatite: Potential antibacterial properties. Comparative study of polymeric nanoparticles and traditional agents in dental implant decontamination. Less cytotoxic phthalocyanine derivative promotes in vitro wound healing compared to chlorhexidine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1