Fluid intake impact on heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Formosan Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.017
Suh-Meei Hsu, Yueh-Hung Lin, Ying-Chun Lin, Shu-Jung Liu, Chih-Ju Liu, Chung-Lieh Hung, Tsae-Jyy Wang
{"title":"Fluid intake impact on heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Suh-Meei Hsu, Yueh-Hung Lin, Ying-Chun Lin, Shu-Jung Liu, Chih-Ju Liu, Chung-Lieh Hung, Tsae-Jyy Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) management lacks clarity regarding fluid balance strategies, with some studies suggesting potential benefits of liberal fluid intake. This review aims to evaluate both unrestricted and restricted fluid intake, including sodium restriction, in adult HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, identified relevant studies examining fluid intake effects on adult heart failure patients, categorized by liberal or restricted intake, with subgroup analysis on sodium restriction. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated, employing trial sequential analysis (TSA) for reliability. Nine studies involving 961 patients were included, with follow-up durations ranging from 2 days to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daily fluid intake ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 L for the intervention group, and sodium intake varied from 2.0 to 5.0 g per day across five studies. No significant differences were observed in re-hospitalization rate, mortality rate, thirst, quality of life, doses of diuretics, or serum sodium levels between liberal and restricted intake groups. However, fluid-restricted patients exhibited increased serum creatinine levels, decreased serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and reduced body weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the existing studies on this topic are hindered by heterogeneity and relatively small sample sizes. However, when the available data is combined, it suggests that HF patients managed with either liberal or restrictive fluid intake exhibit similar clinical outcomes. It's worth noting that fluid restriction in HF patients might lead to increased serum creatinine levels, decreased BNP and body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":17305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2024.11.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) management lacks clarity regarding fluid balance strategies, with some studies suggesting potential benefits of liberal fluid intake. This review aims to evaluate both unrestricted and restricted fluid intake, including sodium restriction, in adult HF.

Methods: A thorough search of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, identified relevant studies examining fluid intake effects on adult heart failure patients, categorized by liberal or restricted intake, with subgroup analysis on sodium restriction. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated, employing trial sequential analysis (TSA) for reliability. Nine studies involving 961 patients were included, with follow-up durations ranging from 2 days to 6 months.

Results: Daily fluid intake ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 L for the intervention group, and sodium intake varied from 2.0 to 5.0 g per day across five studies. No significant differences were observed in re-hospitalization rate, mortality rate, thirst, quality of life, doses of diuretics, or serum sodium levels between liberal and restricted intake groups. However, fluid-restricted patients exhibited increased serum creatinine levels, decreased serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and reduced body weight.

Conclusions: In summary, the existing studies on this topic are hindered by heterogeneity and relatively small sample sizes. However, when the available data is combined, it suggests that HF patients managed with either liberal or restrictive fluid intake exhibit similar clinical outcomes. It's worth noting that fluid restriction in HF patients might lead to increased serum creatinine levels, decreased BNP and body weight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体摄入对心力衰竭的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析与试验序列分析。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)管理中缺乏明确的液体平衡策略,一些研究表明自由摄入液体具有潜在益处。本综述旨在评估成人心力衰竭患者无限制和有限制的液体摄入,包括钠限制:对包括 PubMed、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 图书馆在内的电子数据库进行了全面检索,确定了研究液体摄入对成人心衰患者影响的相关研究,分为自由摄入和限制摄入两种,并对钠限制进行了亚组分析。采用试验序列分析法(TSA)计算汇总的几率比(OR)和加权平均差(WMD),以确保可靠性。共纳入了 9 项研究,涉及 961 名患者,随访时间从 2 天到 6 个月不等:在五项研究中,干预组的每日液体摄入量从 0.8 升到 1.5 升不等,每日钠摄入量从 2.0 克到 5.0 克不等。在再住院率、死亡率、口渴程度、生活质量、利尿剂剂量或血清钠水平方面,自由摄入组和限制摄入组之间未发现明显差异。然而,限制液体摄入的患者血清肌酐水平升高,血清 B 型利钠肽 (BNP) 水平降低,体重减轻:总之,现有的相关研究因异质性和样本量相对较小而受到阻碍。不过,综合现有数据来看,采用自由或限制性液体摄入管理的高血压患者表现出相似的临床结果。值得注意的是,限制高血压患者的液体摄入量可能会导致血清肌酐水平升高、BNP 和体重下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association (JFMA), published continuously since 1902, is an open access international general medical journal of the Formosan Medical Association based in Taipei, Taiwan. It is indexed in Current Contents/ Clinical Medicine, Medline, ciSearch, CAB Abstracts, Embase, SIIC Data Bases, Research Alert, BIOSIS, Biological Abstracts, Scopus and ScienceDirect. As a general medical journal, research related to clinical practice and research in all fields of medicine and related disciplines are considered for publication. Article types considered include perspectives, reviews, original papers, case reports, brief communications, correspondence and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
A deep learning approach for the screening of referable age-related macular degeneration - Model development and external validation. Effects of loss of second molar on masticatory ability and oral health-related quality of life: A comparative cross-sectional study. Non-recovery acute kidney injury and additional risk factors for short-term and long-term hypoglycemia: A multi-institutional cohort study. Validation and clinical implications of higher intercostal space electrocardiography in the patient with Brugada syndrome in Taiwan (SADS-TW BrS registry). Variant-specific treatment gaps: Evaluating the low use of tocilizumab and enoxaparin in omicron ICU cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1