An Analysis of Opioid Consumption and Patient Recovery after Hysterectomy by Surgical Approach.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.0863
Jennie J DeBlanc, Chad M Brummett, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Sawsan As-Sanie, Daniel M Morgan
{"title":"An Analysis of Opioid Consumption and Patient Recovery after Hysterectomy by Surgical Approach.","authors":"Jennie J DeBlanc, Chad M Brummett, Vidhya Gunaseelan, Sawsan As-Sanie, Daniel M Morgan","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.0863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Minimally invasive hysterectomy is preferred to open hysterectomy due to lower morbidity, but recent data regarding the association of surgical approach with patient recovery and opioid consumption are lacking. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To analyze how postoperative opioid use and return to baseline activity vary by surgical approach for hysterectomy. <b><i>Study design:</i></b> This was a retrospective cohort study including hysterectomy patients from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry that was linked to the State of Michigan's prescription drug monitoring program. We analyzed two primary outcomes with respect to surgical approach: opioid consumption in the 30 days following surgery, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and return to baseline activity >4 weeks after surgery. Adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, surgical indication, clinical events at 30 days postoperatively, and surgical approach, we used multivariable linear regression and logistic regression models to identify factors associated with our primary outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Lower opioid consumption was reported with minimally invasive hysterectomy, with mean postoperative opioid consumption (95% CI) of 32.70 (27.15-38.26) MMEs for vaginal, 39.91 (37.17-42.65) MMEs for laparoscopic, and 54.97 (48.81-61.13) MMEs for open hysterectomy. Other covariates associated with lower opioid consumption included older age and year of surgery in 2019 versus 2018. Predicted probability of return to baseline activities >4 weeks after surgery was 51% (44-57%), 43% (40-45%), and 64% (60-69%) for vaginal, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy, respectively. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption and a more rapid recovery relative to open hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive hysterectomy is preferred to open hysterectomy due to lower morbidity, but recent data regarding the association of surgical approach with patient recovery and opioid consumption are lacking. Objective: To analyze how postoperative opioid use and return to baseline activity vary by surgical approach for hysterectomy. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study including hysterectomy patients from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry that was linked to the State of Michigan's prescription drug monitoring program. We analyzed two primary outcomes with respect to surgical approach: opioid consumption in the 30 days following surgery, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and return to baseline activity >4 weeks after surgery. Adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, preoperative opioid use, surgical indication, clinical events at 30 days postoperatively, and surgical approach, we used multivariable linear regression and logistic regression models to identify factors associated with our primary outcomes. Results: Lower opioid consumption was reported with minimally invasive hysterectomy, with mean postoperative opioid consumption (95% CI) of 32.70 (27.15-38.26) MMEs for vaginal, 39.91 (37.17-42.65) MMEs for laparoscopic, and 54.97 (48.81-61.13) MMEs for open hysterectomy. Other covariates associated with lower opioid consumption included older age and year of surgery in 2019 versus 2018. Predicted probability of return to baseline activities >4 weeks after surgery was 51% (44-57%), 43% (40-45%), and 64% (60-69%) for vaginal, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy, respectively. Conclusion: Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption and a more rapid recovery relative to open hysterectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按手术方式分析子宫切除术后阿片类药物的用量和患者的恢复情况。
背景:与开腹子宫切除术相比,微创子宫切除术因其发病率较低而备受青睐,但近期有关手术方式与患者康复和阿片类药物消耗量之间关系的数据尚缺。目的:分析术后阿片类药物的使用情况:分析子宫切除术的手术方式不同,术后阿片类药物的使用量和恢复基线活动量有何差异。研究设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括密歇根州手术质量合作登记处的子宫切除术患者,该登记处与密歇根州的处方药监控计划相连。我们分析了与手术方法相关的两个主要结果:术后 30 天内的阿片类药物消耗量(以吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)计)以及术后 4 周以上恢复基线活动量。在对人口统计学、合并症、术前阿片类药物使用、手术适应症、术后 30 天的临床事件和手术方式进行调整后,我们使用多变量线性回归和逻辑回归模型来确定与主要结果相关的因素。结果据报道,微创子宫切除术的阿片类药物消耗量较低,阴式子宫切除术的术后阿片类药物平均消耗量(95% CI)为32.70(27.15-38.26)MMEs,腹腔镜子宫切除术的术后阿片类药物平均消耗量为39.91(37.17-42.65)MMEs,开腹子宫切除术的术后阿片类药物平均消耗量为54.97(48.81-61.13)MMEs。与阿片类药物消耗量较低相关的其他协变量包括年龄较大以及手术年份为2019年与2018年。阴道、腹腔镜和开腹子宫切除术术后大于4周恢复基线活动的预测概率分别为51%(44-57%)、43%(40-45%)和64%(60-69%)。结论与开腹子宫切除术相比,微创子宫切除术的术后阿片类药物用量更低,恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Opioid Consumption and Patient Recovery after Hysterectomy by Surgical Approach. Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Clinical Factors Associated with Postpartum Readmission. Nonuse of Contraception at Conception Due to Partner Objection and Pregnancy-Related Health Care Utilization, Postpartum Health, and Infant Birth Outcomes. Health Disparities in Vasomotor Symptom Prevalence and Treatment Discontinuation in Women of Menopausal Age: A Commercial Claims Analysis. Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcomes and Survival in Women with Aortic Valve and/or Aortic Root Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1