Do plant resistance inducers reduce Plasmopara viticola infection on grapevine berry clusters at different growth stages?

IF 4.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Plant disease Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1094/PDIS-07-24-1575-RE
Vittorio Rossi, Othmane Taibi, Margherita Furiosi, Tito Caffi
{"title":"Do plant resistance inducers reduce <i>Plasmopara viticola</i> infection on grapevine berry clusters at different growth stages?","authors":"Vittorio Rossi, Othmane Taibi, Margherita Furiosi, Tito Caffi","doi":"10.1094/PDIS-07-24-1575-RE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant resistance inducers (PRIs) are promising alternatives to chemical fungicides. Their effectiveness against grapevine downy mildew (DM) has been demonstrated for leaves, yet research on berry clusters is limited. We investigated the efficacy of six PRIs on clusters of cv. Barbera and Merlot from the end of flowering (growth stage GS 69) to fruit setting (GS 71) and inoculated with a sporangial suspension of Plasmopara viticola (Pv) at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 19 days after treatment (DAT). Cerevisane (CER) and Pythium oligandrum (PYT) did not reduce DM severity compared to the nontreated control (NT). Fosetyl-Al (FOS) reduced DM severity at 1-6 DAT, with >50% reduction compared to NT. Laminarin (LAM) was effective at 6, 12, and 19 DAT, with 42.7%-to 50.0% efficacy compared to NT, while cos-oga (COS) and K-phosphonate (PHO) were effective at 12 and 19 DAT (60% efficacy). PRIs were also applied to clusters at initial flowering (GS 60), GS 69-71, and pea-sized berries (GS 75), which were then inoculated with Pv at 7 DAT. At GS 60, treatments with LAM and PHO reduced disease severity compared to NT by 77.5% and 83.6%, respectively. At GS 69-71, LAM, PHO, and FOS caused 54.7%-75.7% disease reduction. At GS 75, all PRIs exhibited a disease reduction > 75%. The efficacy of PRIs increased as the cluster developmental stage advanced, indicating an interaction with the ontogenic resistance of berries. Our results are relevant for the practical use of PRIs in protecting grapevine clusters from DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":20063,"journal":{"name":"Plant disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-24-1575-RE","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant resistance inducers (PRIs) are promising alternatives to chemical fungicides. Their effectiveness against grapevine downy mildew (DM) has been demonstrated for leaves, yet research on berry clusters is limited. We investigated the efficacy of six PRIs on clusters of cv. Barbera and Merlot from the end of flowering (growth stage GS 69) to fruit setting (GS 71) and inoculated with a sporangial suspension of Plasmopara viticola (Pv) at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 19 days after treatment (DAT). Cerevisane (CER) and Pythium oligandrum (PYT) did not reduce DM severity compared to the nontreated control (NT). Fosetyl-Al (FOS) reduced DM severity at 1-6 DAT, with >50% reduction compared to NT. Laminarin (LAM) was effective at 6, 12, and 19 DAT, with 42.7%-to 50.0% efficacy compared to NT, while cos-oga (COS) and K-phosphonate (PHO) were effective at 12 and 19 DAT (60% efficacy). PRIs were also applied to clusters at initial flowering (GS 60), GS 69-71, and pea-sized berries (GS 75), which were then inoculated with Pv at 7 DAT. At GS 60, treatments with LAM and PHO reduced disease severity compared to NT by 77.5% and 83.6%, respectively. At GS 69-71, LAM, PHO, and FOS caused 54.7%-75.7% disease reduction. At GS 75, all PRIs exhibited a disease reduction > 75%. The efficacy of PRIs increased as the cluster developmental stage advanced, indicating an interaction with the ontogenic resistance of berries. Our results are relevant for the practical use of PRIs in protecting grapevine clusters from DM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物抗性诱导剂是否能减少不同生长阶段葡萄浆果簇上的葡萄原原条胞病毒感染?
植物抗性诱导剂(PRIs)是一种很有前途的化学杀菌剂替代品。它们对葡萄霜霉病(DM)的效果已在叶片上得到证实,但对浆果簇的研究还很有限。我们研究了六种 PRIs 在葡萄品种巴贝拉和梅洛的果穗上的药效。我们研究了六种 PRIs 对巴伯拉(Barbera)和梅洛(Merlot)葡萄品种从开花末期(生长阶段 GS 69)到坐果期(GS 71)果穗的功效,并在处理后 1、3、6、12 和 19 天(DAT)接种了葡萄孢子悬浮液(Pv)。与未处理的对照组(NT)相比,Cerevisane(CER)和Pythium oligandrum(PYT)并没有减轻 DM 的严重程度。Fosetyl-Al (FOS) 降低了 1-6 DAT 的 DM 严重程度,与 NT 相比降低了 50%以上。氨基甲酸乙酯(LAM)在 6、12 和 19 日龄时有效,与未处理对照相比,有效率为 42.7% 至 50.0%,而复方阿糖胞苷(COS)和 K-膦酸盐(PHO)在 12 和 19 日龄时有效(有效率为 60%)。在初花(GS 60)、GS 69-71 和豌豆大小浆果(GS 75)的果穗上也施用了 PRIs,然后在 7 DAT 时接种 Pv。在 GS 60,使用 LAM 和 PHO 与 NT 相比,病害严重程度分别降低了 77.5% 和 83.6%。在 GS 69-71 期,LAM、PHO 和 FOS 可使病害减轻 54.7%-75.7%。在 GS 75 时,所有 PRIs 的病害减轻率均大于 75%。PRIs 的功效随着果穗发育阶段的推进而增加,这表明 PRIs 与浆果的本体抗性之间存在相互作用。我们的研究结果对实际使用 PRIs 保护葡萄果穗免受 DM 侵害具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant disease
Plant disease 农林科学-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1993
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Disease is the leading international journal for rapid reporting of research on new, emerging, and established plant diseases. The journal publishes papers that describe basic and applied research focusing on practical aspects of disease diagnosis, development, and management.
期刊最新文献
Control of Pestalotiopsis leaf spot of palms by fungicides, plant hormones and biological agents. Do plant resistance inducers reduce Plasmopara viticola infection on grapevine berry clusters at different growth stages? Epidemiology of Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) in Commercial Greenhouses. First detection of Aster Yellows Associated with Phytoplasma on Camelina sativa in Montana. First report of leaf spot disease caused by Neopestalotiopsis chrysea on Ligustrum lucidum in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1