Comparison of a Novel Head-mounted Perimeter vs. the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

Q2 Medicine Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.007
Wisam O Najdawi, Fangfang Jiang, Gideon K D Zamba, Chris A Johnson, Andrew E Pouw
{"title":"Comparison of a Novel Head-mounted Perimeter vs. the Humphrey Field Analyzer.","authors":"Wisam O Najdawi, Fangfang Jiang, Gideon K D Zamba, Chris A Johnson, Andrew E Pouw","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Perimetry is a critical tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucomatous visual field defects. The Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) is a large, relatively expensive device that does not normally allow for examination outside of the clinic, and it can be ergonomically difficult to tolerate for some patients. The present study compared the novel Smart System Virtual Reality (SSVR) perimetric headset test to that of the HFA in a group of patients with glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective comparative study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Seventy-two eyes from 36 patients with glaucoma recruited at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed both HFA and SSVR visual field tests on the same day, with the order of tests randomized. After completing both visual field tests, subjects completed a survey regarding their subjective experience using each perimeter. Visual fields were analyzed using a linear mixed model to assess differences between devices accounting for intereye correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and test duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in MD was observed between the SSVR (-7.17 ± 6.36 dB) and HFA (-6.88 ± 6.78 dB; P = 0.859). Statistically significant differences in PSD were observed between the SSVR (4.26 ± 2.37 dB) and HFA (6.38 ± 4.51 dB; P < 0.001) and test duration (323.44 ± 72.27 seconds and 372.20 ± 61.44 seconds, respectively; P < 0.001). Subjectively, the SSVR was the preferred perimeter by 88.5% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSVR headset is a novel visual field testing device that produces similar results to the HFA with a shorter testing duration. The SSVR was the preferred perimeter by the majority of patients. Future study is required to determine if the SSVR can identify visual field progression.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":56368,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2024.11.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Perimetry is a critical tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucomatous visual field defects. The Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) is a large, relatively expensive device that does not normally allow for examination outside of the clinic, and it can be ergonomically difficult to tolerate for some patients. The present study compared the novel Smart System Virtual Reality (SSVR) perimetric headset test to that of the HFA in a group of patients with glaucoma.

Design: Prospective comparative study.

Subjects: Seventy-two eyes from 36 patients with glaucoma recruited at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics.

Methods: Patients completed both HFA and SSVR visual field tests on the same day, with the order of tests randomized. After completing both visual field tests, subjects completed a survey regarding their subjective experience using each perimeter. Visual fields were analyzed using a linear mixed model to assess differences between devices accounting for intereye correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures included mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and test duration.

Results: No statistically significant difference in MD was observed between the SSVR (-7.17 ± 6.36 dB) and HFA (-6.88 ± 6.78 dB; P = 0.859). Statistically significant differences in PSD were observed between the SSVR (4.26 ± 2.37 dB) and HFA (6.38 ± 4.51 dB; P < 0.001) and test duration (323.44 ± 72.27 seconds and 372.20 ± 61.44 seconds, respectively; P < 0.001). Subjectively, the SSVR was the preferred perimeter by 88.5% of patients.

Conclusions: The SSVR headset is a novel visual field testing device that produces similar results to the HFA with a shorter testing duration. The SSVR was the preferred perimeter by the majority of patients. Future study is required to determine if the SSVR can identify visual field progression.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型头戴式周长仪与汉弗莱场强分析仪的比较。
目的:周边视力测定是诊断和监测青光眼视野缺损的重要工具。汉弗莱视野分析仪(Humphrey Field Analyzer,HFA)是一种大型、相对昂贵的设备,通常不允许在诊室外进行检查,而且从人体工程学角度来看,有些患者可能难以忍受。本研究对一组青光眼患者进行了新型智能系统虚拟现实(SSVR)周边测量耳机测试与 HFA 的比较:设计:前瞻性比较研究:方法:患者同时完成 HFA 和 SSVR 测试:患者在同一天完成 HFA 和 SSVR 视野测试,测试顺序随机。在完成这两项视野测试后,受试者填写了一份调查问卷,内容涉及他们使用每种视力表的主观感受。使用线性混合模型对视野进行分析,以评估不同设备之间的差异,并考虑到眼间相关性和布兰-阿尔特曼分析:主要结果测量指标包括平均偏差(MD)、模式标准偏差(PSD)和测试持续时间:结果:SSVR(-7.17±6.36 dB)和 HFA(-6.88±6.78,P=0.859)之间的 MD 无统计学差异。在 SSVR(4.26±2.37 dB)和 HFA(6.38±4.51,p=结论)之间观察到 PSD 有统计学意义的差异:SSVR 头戴式耳机是一种新型视野测试设备,其测试结果与 HFA 相似,但测试时间更短。SSVR是大多数患者的首选。今后还需要进行研究,以确定 SSVR 是否能识别视野进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
期刊最新文献
Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Presentation and Outcomes of Primary Congenital Glaucoma. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hydrus Microstent for patients with mild to moderate Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Canada. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery and the Distal Aqueous Outflow System: The Final Frontier? Patient Challenges with Glaucoma Eye Drops: A Need to Identify Nonadherence and Facilitate Appropriate Support and Disease Management. Lost in the Angle: The Mystery of the Missing XEN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1