Comparison of calcium citrate and calcium carbonate absorption in patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a double-blind, randomized cross-over trial.

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the efficacy of calcium (Ca) citrate and Ca carbonate supplementation on Ca absorption following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) surgeries.

Setting: A single specialized bariatric center.

Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover study between October 2023 and February 2024. One hundred fifty participants 6 months postmetabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) were randomly selected from the electronic patient record system to create a pool of patients to randomize for the study. The intestinal absorption of Ca carbonate and Ca citrate among groups divided by surgical procedure was compared over 8 hours of testing. Measurements included serum and urine Ca concentrations for peak values (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC_0-8h), along with parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels to calculate minimum PTH (PTH_min) and cumulative PTH decline (AUC_0-8h).

Results: In total, 50 per each surgery group were included with an average age of 40.5 ± 7.6 years, of whom 128 (85.3%) were female. The participants' average BMI was 30.3 ± 2.0 kg/m². The average time elapsed after MBS was 9.8 ± 1.0 months. Ca citrate intake significantly lowered PTH levels and showed enhanced relative Ca bioavailability compared to Ca carbonate. Specifically, PTH levels were notably reduced from 3 to 6 hours postadministration with Ca citrate, with significant differences (P < .001). Ca citrate also demonstrated superior relative bioavailability, as evidenced by a higher AUC_0-8h of 76.1 mg/dL·h versus 74.7 mg/dL·h for carbonate (P = .001) and a C_max of 9.8 mg/dL compared to 9.5 mg/dL for carbonate (P < .001). Additionally, urinary Ca excretion over 9 hours was significantly greater in the citrate group at 83.7 mg/dL compared to 68.6 mg/dL for carbonate (P < .001).

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that Ca citrate was significantly better than carbonate in reducing PTH levels, enhancing relative Ca bioavailability, and increasing urinary Ca excretion. Additionally, Ca citrate resulted in higher cumulative urinary Ca excretion, indicating better Ca absorption.