Illness acceptance among young adults with acne: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.5114/ada.2024.142580
Beata Bień, Piotr Krajewski, Jacek Cezary Szepietowski
{"title":"Illness acceptance among young adults with acne: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Beata Bień, Piotr Krajewski, Jacek Cezary Szepietowski","doi":"10.5114/ada.2024.142580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The level of acceptance of acne can have a substantial impact on improving patients' mood and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the level of acne vulgaris acceptance among young patients and its correlation with disease severity, quality of life, and feelings of stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 213 young individuals diagnosed with acne. A variety of questionnaires were employed to measure the psychological aspects of the condition, including illness acceptance, quality of life, and feeling of stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the Global Evaluation Acne (GEA) scale, 45% of participants had mild acne, 31.7% had minimal acne, and 23.3% had moderate acne. The Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) scores ranged from 13 to 40, with a mean of 37.0 ±5.2 points. Males had higher illness acceptance (mean score: 37.7 vs. 36.5 points; <i>p</i> = 0.027). Most participants (87.6%) had high illness acceptance. The greatest challenge was adjusting to disease limitations. A significant negative correlation was found between acne severity and illness acceptance (<i>r</i> = -0.277<i>; p</i> < 0.001), between AIS scores and both QoL impairment (measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI)) (<i>r</i> = -0.499 and <i>r</i> = -0.621, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001 for both) as well as between AIS scores and the 6-Item Stigmatization Scale (6-ISS) (<i>r</i> = -0.621, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The level of acne acceptance depends on gender and the severity of acne lesions. Based on the study results, we hypothesize that an intervention aimed at increasing the level of disease acceptance could improve patients' psychological well-being and ability to cope with the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":54595,"journal":{"name":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","volume":"41 5","pages":"530-535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ada.2024.142580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The level of acceptance of acne can have a substantial impact on improving patients' mood and quality of life.

Aim: To investigate the level of acne vulgaris acceptance among young patients and its correlation with disease severity, quality of life, and feelings of stigmatization.

Material and methods: The study was conducted on 213 young individuals diagnosed with acne. A variety of questionnaires were employed to measure the psychological aspects of the condition, including illness acceptance, quality of life, and feeling of stigmatization.

Results: Based on the Global Evaluation Acne (GEA) scale, 45% of participants had mild acne, 31.7% had minimal acne, and 23.3% had moderate acne. The Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) scores ranged from 13 to 40, with a mean of 37.0 ±5.2 points. Males had higher illness acceptance (mean score: 37.7 vs. 36.5 points; p = 0.027). Most participants (87.6%) had high illness acceptance. The greatest challenge was adjusting to disease limitations. A significant negative correlation was found between acne severity and illness acceptance (r = -0.277; p < 0.001), between AIS scores and both QoL impairment (measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI)) (r = -0.499 and r = -0.621, respectively; p < 0.001 for both) as well as between AIS scores and the 6-Item Stigmatization Scale (6-ISS) (r = -0.621, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The level of acne acceptance depends on gender and the severity of acne lesions. Based on the study results, we hypothesize that an intervention aimed at increasing the level of disease acceptance could improve patients' psychological well-being and ability to cope with the condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有痤疮的年轻人对疾病的接受程度:一项横断面研究。
导言目的:调查年轻患者对寻常痤疮的接受程度及其与疾病严重程度、生活质量和耻辱感的相关性:研究对象为 213 名确诊为痤疮的年轻人。结果:根据痤疮全球评估(Global Evaluation Acnex)的结果,痤疮的严重程度、生活质量和耻辱感与痤疮患者的心理状况有关:根据痤疮总体评价量表(GEA),45%的受试者患有轻度痤疮,31.7%的受试者患有轻度痤疮,23.3%的受试者患有中度痤疮。疾病接受度量表(AIS)得分介于 13 分至 40 分之间,平均分为 37.0 ± 5.2 分。男性对疾病的接受度更高(平均分:37.7 分对 36.5 分;P = 0.027)。大多数参与者(87.6%)对疾病的接受度较高。最大的挑战是适应疾病的限制。研究发现,痤疮严重程度与疾病接受度之间存在明显的负相关(r = -0.277; p < 0.001),AIS 评分与 QoL 损伤(通过皮肤科生活质量指数 (DLQI) 和卡迪夫痤疮残疾指数 (CADI) 测量)之间存在明显的负相关(r = -0.499 和 r = -0.621;二者的 p <0.001),以及 AIS 分数与 6 项污名化量表(6-ISS)之间的关系(r = -0.621,p <0.001):痤疮的接受程度取决于性别和痤疮皮损的严重程度。根据研究结果,我们假设旨在提高疾病接受程度的干预措施可以改善患者的心理健康和应对疾病的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii is a bimonthly aimed at allergologists and dermatologists.
期刊最新文献
Is there still a place for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin to serve as a biomarker in psoriasis? Rapid desensitization for human serum albumin (Grifols®) hypersensitivity. Rare complications of pediculosis capitis. Regulation of involucrin and signalling pathway in scleroderma epidermal keratinocytes. Relationship between cigarette smoking and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Is there a difference in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1