Sascha Dublin MD, PhD, Ladia Albertson-Junkans MPH, Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen PharmD, MBA, MSCE, Juliessa M. Pavon MD, MHS, S. Nicole Hastings MD, MHS, Matthew L. Maciejewski PhD, Allison Willis MD, MS, Lindsay Zepel MS, Sean Hennessy PharmD, PhD, Kathleen B. Albers MPH, Danielle Mowery PhD, MS, Amy G. Clark PhD, Sunil Thomas MBA/TM, Michael A. Steinman MD, Cynthia M. Boyd MD, MPH, Elizabeth A. Bayliss MD, MSPH
{"title":"Defining key deprescribing measures from electronic health data: A multisite data harmonization project","authors":"Sascha Dublin MD, PhD, Ladia Albertson-Junkans MPH, Thanh Phuong Pham Nguyen PharmD, MBA, MSCE, Juliessa M. Pavon MD, MHS, S. Nicole Hastings MD, MHS, Matthew L. Maciejewski PhD, Allison Willis MD, MS, Lindsay Zepel MS, Sean Hennessy PharmD, PhD, Kathleen B. Albers MPH, Danielle Mowery PhD, MS, Amy G. Clark PhD, Sunil Thomas MBA/TM, Michael A. Steinman MD, Cynthia M. Boyd MD, MPH, Elizabeth A. Bayliss MD, MSPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stopping or reducing risky or unneeded medications (“deprescribing”) could improve older adults' health. Electronic health data can support observational and intervention studies of deprescribing, but there are no standardized measures for key variables, and healthcare systems have differing data types and availability. We developed definitions for chronic medication use and discontinuation based on electronic health data and applied them in a case study of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in five diverse US healthcare systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults age 65+ from 2017 to 2019 with chronic benzodiazepine or Z-drug use. We determined whether sites had access to medication orders and/or dispensings. We developed definitions for chronic use and discontinuation using both data types. Discontinuation definitions were based on (1) gaps in medication availability during follow-up or (2) not having medication available at a fixed time point. We examined the impact of varying the gap length and requiring a 30-day period without orders/dispensings (“halo”) around the fixed time point. We compared results derived from orders versus dispensings at one site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 1.6%–2.6% of older adults had chronic benzodiazepine/Z-drug use (total <i>N</i> = 6775, ranging from 431 to 2122 across sites). Depending on the definition and site, the proportion discontinuing use during 12 months ranged from 6% to 49%. Requiring a longer gap or a 30-day “halo” resulted in lower estimates. At one site, only 56% of those with chronic use defined from orders also qualified based on dispensings, and the discontinuation rate at 180 days was 20% from orders versus 32% from dispensings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Requiring a gap of ≥90 days or a “halo” around a time point may more accurately capture discontinuation than using a shorter gap or no halo. Orders data underestimate discontinuation compared to dispensings. Work is needed to adapt these definitions for other drug classes and settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 2","pages":"399-410"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Stopping or reducing risky or unneeded medications (“deprescribing”) could improve older adults' health. Electronic health data can support observational and intervention studies of deprescribing, but there are no standardized measures for key variables, and healthcare systems have differing data types and availability. We developed definitions for chronic medication use and discontinuation based on electronic health data and applied them in a case study of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in five diverse US healthcare systems.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults age 65+ from 2017 to 2019 with chronic benzodiazepine or Z-drug use. We determined whether sites had access to medication orders and/or dispensings. We developed definitions for chronic use and discontinuation using both data types. Discontinuation definitions were based on (1) gaps in medication availability during follow-up or (2) not having medication available at a fixed time point. We examined the impact of varying the gap length and requiring a 30-day period without orders/dispensings (“halo”) around the fixed time point. We compared results derived from orders versus dispensings at one site.
Results
Approximately 1.6%–2.6% of older adults had chronic benzodiazepine/Z-drug use (total N = 6775, ranging from 431 to 2122 across sites). Depending on the definition and site, the proportion discontinuing use during 12 months ranged from 6% to 49%. Requiring a longer gap or a 30-day “halo” resulted in lower estimates. At one site, only 56% of those with chronic use defined from orders also qualified based on dispensings, and the discontinuation rate at 180 days was 20% from orders versus 32% from dispensings.
Conclusions
Requiring a gap of ≥90 days or a “halo” around a time point may more accurately capture discontinuation than using a shorter gap or no halo. Orders data underestimate discontinuation compared to dispensings. Work is needed to adapt these definitions for other drug classes and settings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.