Survival outcomes of surgically treated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients at tertiary care hospital in Northern Thailand

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102166
Tapanut Ariyanon, Hanpon Klibngern, Pichit Sittitrai, Donyarat Ruenmarkkaew, Weerachai Watcharatsiriyuth
{"title":"Survival outcomes of surgically treated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients at tertiary care hospital in Northern Thailand","authors":"Tapanut Ariyanon,&nbsp;Hanpon Klibngern,&nbsp;Pichit Sittitrai,&nbsp;Donyarat Ruenmarkkaew,&nbsp;Weerachai Watcharatsiriyuth","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with or without adjuvant therapies and factors predicting treatment outcomes from the largest head and neck cancer center in Northern Thailand.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two hundred and sixty OSCC patients curatively treated between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively recruited into the study to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes and compare them with historical data. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Males were slightly predominant (58.1 %). The most common subsite was an oral tongue (48.5 %), followed by an alveolar ridge (18.5 %). Advanced stages (III-IV) presented most at 88.5 %. The majority of the patients (52.3 %) received surgery and chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery and radiotherapy (36.9 %), and surgery alone (10.8 %). The five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were 28.8 %, 44.0 %, and 46.3 %, respectively. Age &gt; 45, ECOG performance status 2, and positive surgical margin status were found to be independent predictors for decreased OS (aHR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.01–3.00, aHR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.22–5.68, and aHR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.18–2.63, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Survival outcomes of OSCC in the study remain poor compared to other studies. The high prevalence of locally advanced stage presentation and inadequate surgical margin are the main problems. Public awareness, cancer screening programs, and intraoperative specimen-driven evaluation might help obtain adequate surgical margins and improve survival outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 3","pages":"Article 102166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785524004555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with or without adjuvant therapies and factors predicting treatment outcomes from the largest head and neck cancer center in Northern Thailand.

Methods

Two hundred and sixty OSCC patients curatively treated between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively recruited into the study to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes and compare them with historical data. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting survival outcomes.

Results

Males were slightly predominant (58.1 %). The most common subsite was an oral tongue (48.5 %), followed by an alveolar ridge (18.5 %). Advanced stages (III-IV) presented most at 88.5 %. The majority of the patients (52.3 %) received surgery and chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery and radiotherapy (36.9 %), and surgery alone (10.8 %). The five-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival were 28.8 %, 44.0 %, and 46.3 %, respectively. Age > 45, ECOG performance status 2, and positive surgical margin status were found to be independent predictors for decreased OS (aHR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.01–3.00, aHR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.22–5.68, and aHR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.18–2.63, respectively).

Conclusions

Survival outcomes of OSCC in the study remain poor compared to other studies. The high prevalence of locally advanced stage presentation and inadequate surgical margin are the main problems. Public awareness, cancer screening programs, and intraoperative specimen-driven evaluation might help obtain adequate surgical margins and improve survival outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泰国北部三级医院口腔鳞状细胞癌患者手术治疗后的生存结果
研究目的本研究旨在评估泰国北部最大的头颈部癌症中心接受或未接受辅助治疗的手术治疗口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者的生存结果以及预测治疗结果的因素:研究回顾性招募了2017年至2021年间接受根治性治疗的260例OSCC患者,分析其临床病理特征和肿瘤学结果,并与历史数据进行比较。采用多变量Cox比例危险模型分析评估影响生存结果的因素:男性略占优势(58.1%)。最常见的部位是口腔舌(48.5%),其次是牙槽嵴(18.5%)。晚期(III-IV 期)患者最多,占 88.5%。大多数患者(52.3%)接受了手术和放化疗,其次是手术和放化疗(36.9%)以及单纯手术(10.8%)。五年总生存率(OS)、疾病特异性生存率和无病生存率分别为28.8%、44.0%和46.3%。研究发现,年龄大于45岁、ECOG表现为2级和手术切缘阳性是OS下降的独立预测因素(aHR分别为1.74,95% CI 1.01-3.00;aHR分别为2.64,95% CI 1.22-5.68;aHR分别为1.76,95% CI 1.18-2.63):结论:与其他研究相比,本研究中OSCC的生存率仍然较低。结论:与其他研究相比,该研究中 OSCC 的生存率仍然较低,主要问题在于局部晚期和手术切缘不足。公众意识、癌症筛查计划和术中标本驱动评估可能有助于获得足够的手术切缘并改善生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Novel de novo CLCN7 mutation in refractory osteopetrosis-related osteomyelitis: A case report and multidisciplinary therapeutic dilemmas Use of unleavened bread to reduce the appearance of radiolucent areas associated with the palatoglossal air space in panoramic radiographs: A comparative study A 3D-printed craniofacial fracture library with QR-integrated pedagogical content: a technical note for maxillofacial trauma teaching Champions in the making? – The Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2026 Sialography and endoscopy-based classification of salivary duct stenosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1