Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1487820
Shayesteh Jahanfar, Julie Mortazavi, Amy Lapidow, Cassandra Cu, Jude Al Abosy, Kathyrn Morris, Juan Camilo Becerra-Mateus, Meredith Steinfeldt, Olivia Maurer, Jiang Bohang, Paola Andrenacci, Marwa Badawy, Moazzam Ali
{"title":"Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review.","authors":"Shayesteh Jahanfar, Julie Mortazavi, Amy Lapidow, Cassandra Cu, Jude Al Abosy, Kathyrn Morris, Juan Camilo Becerra-Mateus, Meredith Steinfeldt, Olivia Maurer, Jiang Bohang, Paola Andrenacci, Marwa Badawy, Moazzam Ali","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1487820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contraceptives play a crucial role in women's reproductive health, their hormonal components may be linked to cancer risks, specifically breast, and gynecological cancers. Given the high usage rates of hormonal contraceptives, it is vital to systematically evaluate their potential impact on cancer outcomes, especially among women with a family history of gynecological cancers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the evidence on the association between modern contraceptive use and the risk of breast and reproductive cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) among women of reproductive age, to inform healthcare providers, women, and program managers about cancer outcomes related to contraceptive use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in databases such as CINAHL, OVID Medline, EMBASE, and more from inception to February 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared cancer outcomes between contraceptive users and non-users. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analyses were conducted following predefined protocols. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined variations in contraceptive methods, doses, and duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 studies were included, comprising 2 RCTs and 49 observational studies. The review identified a significant reduction in ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence among contraceptive users. Hormonal contraceptive users had a 36% lower risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68), with specific reductions seen in combined oral contraceptive users (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68) and hormonal IUD users (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96). The rate ratio of cervical cancer was higher among non- users compared to hormonal contraceptive users when we pooled the results (1.28, 95% CI 1.21, 1.35). No significant association was found between contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among healthy women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). However, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers using oral contraceptives showed a heightened risk of breast cancer (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review highlights the protective effects of modern contraceptives against ovarian and endometrial cancers while identifying an increased risk of cervical. No significant breast cancer risk was found for healthy women, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers faced increased risks. These findings underscore the need for personalized contraceptive counselling that considers cancer risk factors. Further research is needed to explore contraceptive impacts across different genetic profiles and dosing regimens.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Prospero (CRD42022332647).</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1487820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11599208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1487820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contraceptives play a crucial role in women's reproductive health, their hormonal components may be linked to cancer risks, specifically breast, and gynecological cancers. Given the high usage rates of hormonal contraceptives, it is vital to systematically evaluate their potential impact on cancer outcomes, especially among women with a family history of gynecological cancers.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the evidence on the association between modern contraceptive use and the risk of breast and reproductive cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) among women of reproductive age, to inform healthcare providers, women, and program managers about cancer outcomes related to contraceptive use.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in databases such as CINAHL, OVID Medline, EMBASE, and more from inception to February 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared cancer outcomes between contraceptive users and non-users. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analyses were conducted following predefined protocols. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined variations in contraceptive methods, doses, and duration.

Results: A total of 51 studies were included, comprising 2 RCTs and 49 observational studies. The review identified a significant reduction in ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence among contraceptive users. Hormonal contraceptive users had a 36% lower risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68), with specific reductions seen in combined oral contraceptive users (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68) and hormonal IUD users (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96). The rate ratio of cervical cancer was higher among non- users compared to hormonal contraceptive users when we pooled the results (1.28, 95% CI 1.21, 1.35). No significant association was found between contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among healthy women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). However, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers using oral contraceptives showed a heightened risk of breast cancer (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.67).

Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the protective effects of modern contraceptives against ovarian and endometrial cancers while identifying an increased risk of cervical. No significant breast cancer risk was found for healthy women, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers faced increased risks. These findings underscore the need for personalized contraceptive counselling that considers cancer risk factors. Further research is needed to explore contraceptive impacts across different genetic profiles and dosing regimens.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Prospero (CRD42022332647).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估避孕药具的使用对育龄妇女患生殖系统癌症风险的影响--系统综述。
背景:避孕药对妇女的生殖健康起着至关重要的作用,其激素成分可能与癌症风险有关,特别是乳腺癌和妇科癌症。鉴于激素避孕药的高使用率,系统评估其对癌症结果的潜在影响至关重要,尤其是在有妇科癌症家族史的妇女中:本研究旨在评估现代避孕药具的使用与育龄妇女罹患乳腺癌和生殖系统癌症(卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌)风险之间关系的证据,为医疗服务提供者、妇女和项目管理人员提供与避孕药具使用相关的癌症结果信息:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性综述。从开始到 2022 年 2 月,在 CINAHL、OVID Medline、EMBASE 等数据库中进行了检索。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究,这些研究对避孕药具使用者和非使用者的癌症结果进行了比较。数据提取、质量评估和荟萃分析均按照预定方案进行。分组分析和敏感性分析研究了避孕方法、剂量和持续时间的变化:共纳入 51 项研究,包括 2 项研究性试验和 49 项观察性研究。研究发现,避孕药使用者的卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌发病率明显降低。荷尔蒙避孕药使用者罹患卵巢癌的风险降低了 36%(RR 0.64,95% CI 0.60-0.68),其中复合口服避孕药使用者(RR 0.62,95% CI 0.57-0.68)和荷尔蒙宫内节育器使用者(RR 0.68,95% CI 0.48-0.96)罹患卵巢癌的风险明显降低。在汇总结果时,未使用避孕药者患宫颈癌的比率高于使用激素避孕药者(1.28,95% CI 1.21,1.35)。在健康女性中,避孕药具的使用与乳腺癌风险之间没有发现明显的关联(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.94-1.06)。然而,使用口服避孕药的 BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者罹患乳腺癌的风险更高(HR 1.39,95% CI 1.15-1.67):本系统综述强调了现代避孕药对卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的保护作用,同时也发现了宫颈癌风险的增加。健康女性没有发现明显的乳腺癌风险,但 BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者面临的风险增加。这些发现强调了考虑癌症风险因素的个性化避孕咨询的必要性。需要进一步开展研究,探讨不同基因图谱和用药方案对避孕的影响。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,Prospero (CRD42022332647)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review. Sex discrepancies in cancer research: a systematic review of prospective and retrospective investigations in lung, melanoma, and colorectal cancers. s-CAPE trauma recovery program: the need for a holistic, trauma- and violence-informed domestic violence framework. Insights into perceptions, responses, and challenges experienced by women and girls' survivors of sexual violence and their communities in rural Guinea, 2020. Safe limits on work hours for the nursing profession: a rapid evidence review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1