Effects of Integrated Care Approaches to Address Co-occurring Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1334
Zach W Cooper, Jay O'Shields, Mohammed K Ali, Lydia Chwastiak, Leslie C M Johnson
{"title":"Effects of Integrated Care Approaches to Address Co-occurring Depression and Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zach W Cooper, Jay O'Shields, Mohammed K Ali, Lydia Chwastiak, Leslie C M Johnson","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive symptoms frequently co-occur with diabetes and, when unaddressed, can function to worsen diabetes control and increase the risk of diabetes-related morbidity. Integrated care (IC) approaches aim to improve outcomes among people with diabetes and depression, but there are no current meta-analyses examining their effects.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In our study we summarize the effects of IC approaches to address depression and diabetes and examine moderating effects of IC approaches (e.g., behavioral intervention used; type of IC approach).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and ProQuest.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Two reviewers triaged abstracts and full-text articles to identify relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials with enrollment of participants with diabetes and depressive symptoms and with provision of sufficient data on depression scores and hemoglobin A1c were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers extracted demographic information, depression scores, diabetes outcomes, intervention details, and the risk of bias for each study.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>From 517 abstracts, 75 full-text reports were reviewed and 31 studies with 8,843 participants were analyzed. Among 26 studies with reporting of HbA1c, IC approaches were associated with a significant between-group difference regarding the percent decrease of HbA1c (d = -0.36, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.21). Studies that included a combination of behavioral interventions (behavioral activation with cognitive behavioral therapy) showed greater reductions in HbA1c. Among 23 studies with reporting of depressive symptoms, the pooled effect of IC approaches lowered depressive scores by 0.72 points (95% CI -1.15 to -0.28).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The inclusion of a wide range of IC approaches increased study heterogeneity. A random effects model and sensitivity analyses mitigated this limitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IC approaches are associated with improved glycemia and depressive symptoms in comparison with treatment as usual.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":"47 12","pages":"2291-2304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depressive symptoms frequently co-occur with diabetes and, when unaddressed, can function to worsen diabetes control and increase the risk of diabetes-related morbidity. Integrated care (IC) approaches aim to improve outcomes among people with diabetes and depression, but there are no current meta-analyses examining their effects.

Purpose: In our study we summarize the effects of IC approaches to address depression and diabetes and examine moderating effects of IC approaches (e.g., behavioral intervention used; type of IC approach).

Data sources: A systematic search was conducted of PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and ProQuest.

Study selection: Two reviewers triaged abstracts and full-text articles to identify relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials with enrollment of participants with diabetes and depressive symptoms and with provision of sufficient data on depression scores and hemoglobin A1c were included.

Data extraction: Two reviewers extracted demographic information, depression scores, diabetes outcomes, intervention details, and the risk of bias for each study.

Data synthesis: From 517 abstracts, 75 full-text reports were reviewed and 31 studies with 8,843 participants were analyzed. Among 26 studies with reporting of HbA1c, IC approaches were associated with a significant between-group difference regarding the percent decrease of HbA1c (d = -0.36, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.21). Studies that included a combination of behavioral interventions (behavioral activation with cognitive behavioral therapy) showed greater reductions in HbA1c. Among 23 studies with reporting of depressive symptoms, the pooled effect of IC approaches lowered depressive scores by 0.72 points (95% CI -1.15 to -0.28).

Limitations: The inclusion of a wide range of IC approaches increased study heterogeneity. A random effects model and sensitivity analyses mitigated this limitation.

Conclusions: IC approaches are associated with improved glycemia and depressive symptoms in comparison with treatment as usual.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决抑郁症和糖尿病并发症的综合护理方法的效果:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:抑郁症状经常与糖尿病并发,如果得不到解决,会使糖尿病控制恶化,增加糖尿病相关发病风险。综合护理(IC)方法旨在改善糖尿病合并抑郁症患者的治疗效果,但目前还没有对其效果进行荟萃分析。目的:在我们的研究中,我们总结了综合护理方法在治疗抑郁症和糖尿病方面的效果,并研究了综合护理方法的调节作用(如使用的行为干预;综合护理方法的类型):对 PubMed、PsycInfo、CINAHL 和 ProQuest 进行了系统检索:两名审稿人对摘要和全文进行了筛选,以确定相关文章。数据提取:两位审稿人对摘要和全文进行了分拣,找出了相关文章,纳入了有糖尿病和抑郁症状参与者的随机对照试验,并提供了足够的抑郁评分和血红蛋白A1c数据:两名审稿人提取了每项研究的人口统计学信息、抑郁评分、糖尿病结果、干预细节和偏倚风险:从 517 篇摘要中筛选出 75 篇全文报告,并对 31 项研究的 8,843 名参与者进行了分析。在报告 HbA1c 的 26 项研究中,IC 方法与 HbA1c 下降百分比的组间差异显著相关(d = -0.36,95% CI -0.52--0.21)。包含行为干预组合(行为激活与认知行为疗法)的研究显示 HbA1c 下降幅度更大。在 23 项报告了抑郁症状的研究中,综合集成电路方法的综合效应使抑郁评分降低了 0.72 分(95% CI -1.15 至 -0.28):局限性:纳入多种集成电路方法增加了研究的异质性。随机效应模型和敏感性分析减轻了这一局限性:结论:与常规治疗相比,IC疗法可改善血糖和抑郁症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Arterial Stiffness Is Related to Diabetes-Associated Microvascular Complications: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Association Between Self-Monitored Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Medicaid Insurance. Flying With Type 1 Diabetes as Commercial Airline Pilots in the U.S.: The Sky Is the Limit for People With Type 1 Diabetes. Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry. Longitudinal Determination of Diabetes Complications and Other Clinical Variables as Risk Factors for Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1