Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.
Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne
{"title":"Islet Transplantation Versus Standard of Care for Type 1 Diabetes Complicated by Severe Hypoglycemia From the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry and the T1D Exchange Registry.","authors":"Michael R Rickels, Cassandra M Ballou, Nicole C Foster, Rodolfo Alejandro, David A Baidal, Melena D Bellin, Thomas L Eggerman, Bernhard J Hering, Fouad Kandeel, Adam Brand, Kellee M Miller, Franca B Barton, Elizabeth H Payne","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Islet transplantation was recently US Food and Drug Administration approved for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (cases) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (controls), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cases from CITR (n = 71) compared with controls from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80 vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Islet transplantation was recently US Food and Drug Administration approved for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by recurrent severe hypoglycemia events (SHEs). We sought to understand the long-term benefit for glycemic control and risk of immunosuppression to kidney function associated with islet transplantation compared with ongoing standard of care.
Research design and methods: We performed a case-control analysis of prospectively collected data from patients in the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) with at least one SHE in the year (2000-2014) before transplantation (cases) and compared them with data from patients in the T1D Exchange (T1DX) Registry with at least one SHE in the year (2010-2012) before enrollment (controls), with both cohorts observed over 5 years. SHEs were restricted to those resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness.
Results: Cases from CITR (n = 71) compared with controls from T1DX (n = 213) more often achieved the primary outcome of HbA1c <7.0% and absence of an SHE (71-80 vs. 21-33% over 5 years; P < 0.001) and the outcome of HbA1c ≤6.5% and absence of an SHE (60-75% vs. 10-20%; P < 0.001) while requiring significantly less insulin (majority in CITR were insulin independent). Kidney function, measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate, declined from baseline to a greater extent in CITR than in T1DX (-8.8 to -20 vs. -1.3 to -6.5 mL ⋅ min-1 ⋅ 1.73 m-2 over 5 years; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Islet transplantation for adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by SHEs results in near-normal glycemic control in the absence of SHEs more often than observed with standard of care, but at the cost of greater reduction in kidney function.