Han Hwi Kim, Minuk Kim, Jun Su Lee, Jun Ho Park, Jun-Young Park, Xia-Dong Zhou, Hyung-Tae Lim
{"title":"Understanding delamination behavior of air electrode in solid oxide electrolysis cells through in situ monitoring of internal oxygen partial pressure","authors":"Han Hwi Kim, Minuk Kim, Jun Su Lee, Jun Ho Park, Jun-Young Park, Xia-Dong Zhou, Hyung-Tae Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.cej.2024.158129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we monitored the development of internal <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> in solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) in situ using an embedded probe and a reference electrode. Three types of air electrode cells were compared: LSM (La<sub>0.8</sub>Sr<sub>0.2</sub>MnO<sub>3−δ</sub>) + YSZ (Y<sub>0.08</sub>Zr<sub>0.92</sub>O<sub>2−δ</sub>), LSCF (La<sub>0.6</sub>Sr<sub>0.4</sub>Co<sub>0.2</sub>Fe<sub>0.8</sub>O<sub>3−δ</sub>) + GDC (Gd-doped ceria) and LSM + GdCeScSZ ((Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.005</sub>(CeO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>0.005</sub>(Sc<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.1</sub>(ZrO<sub>2</sub>)<sub>0.89</sub>). The rate of <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> increase with the increase in current density was highest in the LSM + YSZ cell, reaching ∼32201 atm at 0.6 A cm<sup>−2</sup>, resulting in air electrode delamination and intergranular fractures. This physically developed delamination with high <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> is akin to catastrophic failure, accelerating degradation. The LSCF + GDC cells exhibited a maximum <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> of ∼12.25 atm and operated stably without increasing <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> or delamination. In the LSM + GdCeScSZ cells, internal <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> was substantially suppressed to ∼10<sup>−3</sup> atm, with a degradation rate comparable to that of the LSCF + GDC cell. However, the air electrode delaminated without intergranular fractures. This chemically developed delamination without high internal <em>p</em>O<sub>2</sub> does not significantly accelerate degradation. These results indicate that the delamination mechanism may vary even with the same LSM electrode, depending on its ionic conduction characteristics.","PeriodicalId":270,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"258 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we monitored the development of internal pO2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) in situ using an embedded probe and a reference electrode. Three types of air electrode cells were compared: LSM (La0.8Sr0.2MnO3−δ) + YSZ (Y0.08Zr0.92O2−δ), LSCF (La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ) + GDC (Gd-doped ceria) and LSM + GdCeScSZ ((Gd2O3)0.005(CeO2)0.005(Sc2O3)0.1(ZrO2)0.89). The rate of pO2 increase with the increase in current density was highest in the LSM + YSZ cell, reaching ∼32201 atm at 0.6 A cm−2, resulting in air electrode delamination and intergranular fractures. This physically developed delamination with high pO2 is akin to catastrophic failure, accelerating degradation. The LSCF + GDC cells exhibited a maximum pO2 of ∼12.25 atm and operated stably without increasing pO2 or delamination. In the LSM + GdCeScSZ cells, internal pO2 was substantially suppressed to ∼10−3 atm, with a degradation rate comparable to that of the LSCF + GDC cell. However, the air electrode delaminated without intergranular fractures. This chemically developed delamination without high internal pO2 does not significantly accelerate degradation. These results indicate that the delamination mechanism may vary even with the same LSM electrode, depending on its ionic conduction characteristics.
期刊介绍:
The Chemical Engineering Journal is an international research journal that invites contributions of original and novel fundamental research. It aims to provide an international platform for presenting original fundamental research, interpretative reviews, and discussions on new developments in chemical engineering. The journal welcomes papers that describe novel theory and its practical application, as well as those that demonstrate the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. It also welcomes reports on carefully conducted experimental work that is soundly interpreted. The main focus of the journal is on original and rigorous research results that have broad significance. The Catalysis section within the Chemical Engineering Journal focuses specifically on Experimental and Theoretical studies in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. These studies have industrial impact on various sectors such as chemicals, energy, materials, foods, healthcare, and environmental protection.