Investigating Major Sources of Methane Emissions at US Landfills

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c07572
Tia R. Scarpelli, Daniel H. Cusworth, Riley M. Duren, Jinsol Kim, Joseph Heckler, Gregory P. Asner, Eben Thoma, Max J. Krause, Daniel Heins, Susan Thorneloe
{"title":"Investigating Major Sources of Methane Emissions at US Landfills","authors":"Tia R. Scarpelli, Daniel H. Cusworth, Riley M. Duren, Jinsol Kim, Joseph Heckler, Gregory P. Asner, Eben Thoma, Max J. Krause, Daniel Heins, Susan Thorneloe","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c07572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Airborne remote sensing observations were collected at 217 landfills across 17 states in the US in 2023. We used these observations to attribute emissions to major sources, including the landfill work face, where new waste is placed at the landfill and gas-control infrastructure. Methane emissions from the work face appeared to be more prevalent than gas-control infrastructure emissions, with 52 landfills exhibiting work face emissions out of the 115 observed landfills shown to be emitting in 2023. Landfills with work face emissions were often the highest emitters, especially sites with associated renewable natural gas facilities, and the total average site emissions from these landfills accounted for 79% of the observed emissions, indicating inefficient gas capture at these sites. Landfills with work face emissions also displayed the greatest disparity between observed emission rates and hourly emission rates that we estimated using annual emissions reported to the US EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Work face emissions present a major opportunity for methane mitigation: Observed emissions from work face emitting-landfills in this study were equivalent to 15% of US methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills in 2022, as reported in the 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory, though these landfills accounted for only 4% of open sites in the US. As the 217 landfills in this study cover only 17% of open landfills in the US, the total mitigation potential is likely greater. Using remote sensing, we find that the largest contributor to observed methane emissions at US landfills is the landfill work face, an area of the landfill often left out of the required monitoring and traditional emissions accounting methods.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airborne remote sensing observations were collected at 217 landfills across 17 states in the US in 2023. We used these observations to attribute emissions to major sources, including the landfill work face, where new waste is placed at the landfill and gas-control infrastructure. Methane emissions from the work face appeared to be more prevalent than gas-control infrastructure emissions, with 52 landfills exhibiting work face emissions out of the 115 observed landfills shown to be emitting in 2023. Landfills with work face emissions were often the highest emitters, especially sites with associated renewable natural gas facilities, and the total average site emissions from these landfills accounted for 79% of the observed emissions, indicating inefficient gas capture at these sites. Landfills with work face emissions also displayed the greatest disparity between observed emission rates and hourly emission rates that we estimated using annual emissions reported to the US EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Work face emissions present a major opportunity for methane mitigation: Observed emissions from work face emitting-landfills in this study were equivalent to 15% of US methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills in 2022, as reported in the 2024 Greenhouse Gas Inventory, though these landfills accounted for only 4% of open sites in the US. As the 217 landfills in this study cover only 17% of open landfills in the US, the total mitigation potential is likely greater. Using remote sensing, we find that the largest contributor to observed methane emissions at US landfills is the landfill work face, an area of the landfill often left out of the required monitoring and traditional emissions accounting methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查美国垃圾填埋场甲烷排放的主要来源
2023年,在美国17个州的217个垃圾填埋场收集了航空遥感观测数据。我们利用这些观察结果将排放归因于主要来源,包括垃圾填埋场工作面,新废物被放置在垃圾填埋场和气体控制基础设施。工作面的甲烷排放似乎比气体控制基础设施的排放更为普遍,在观察到的115个垃圾填埋场中,有52个垃圾填埋场显示在2023年排放甲烷。具有工作面排放的垃圾填埋场通常是最高的排放者,特别是具有相关可再生天然气设施的垃圾填埋场,这些垃圾填埋场的平均总排放量占观察到的排放量的79%,表明这些地点的气体捕获效率低下。我们利用美国环保署温室气体报告计划的年度排放量估算出的每小时排放率与观测到的排放率之间的差距最大。工作面的排放是减少甲烷排放的一个重要机会:根据2024年温室气体清单的报告,本研究中观察到的工作面的排放垃圾填埋场的排放量相当于2022年美国城市固体废物垃圾填埋场甲烷排放量的15%,尽管这些垃圾填埋场仅占美国开放场地的4%。由于本研究中的217个垃圾填埋场仅占美国开放垃圾填埋场的17%,因此总缓解潜力可能更大。利用遥感技术,我们发现美国垃圾填埋场观测到的甲烷排放的最大贡献者是垃圾填埋场的工作面,而垃圾填埋场的这一区域往往被遗漏在必要的监测和传统的排放核算方法之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
Solid-Phase Reactivity-Directed Microextraction Analysis for Identifying Unknown Toxic Disinfection Byproducts. Closed-Loop Recycling of End-of-Life Poly(Ether Sulfone) Membranes: Upcycling Waste into Bisphenol S via a Catalyst-Free Hydrolysis Process. Structure-Property Relationships for Moisture-Swing Direct Air Capture. Why Antimicrobial Resistance Does Not Perpetually Expand in an Antibiotics-Free Environment: Insight from Quorum Sensing. Sediment Resuspension as a System-Wide Driver of Legacy and Bioavailable Phosphorus Release in Lake Erie.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1