Optimum level of Republic of Korea copper stockpile using disruption risk model

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105418
Kangho Kim , Jinsoo Kim
{"title":"Optimum level of Republic of Korea copper stockpile using disruption risk model","authors":"Kangho Kim ,&nbsp;Jinsoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the adequacy of copper stockpiles managed by the Korean government and proposes an economically optimal level from a strategic perspective. The Disruption-Risk model, a methodology that aims to maximize the net benefit of stockpiling by considering potential future demand and supply disruptions, was employed in this analysis. The analysis showed that stockpiling an additional 2400 metric tons above Korea's current target is an economically optimal strategy. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis showed that it is a rational decision for the government to engage in stockpiling activities rather than the private sector. It was found that it is essential to continuously increase and maintain stockpiles in line with Korea's evolving policy direction. The findings of this study employ statistical methods based on historical disruption data, which allows for a comparison with the prevailing approach to calculating stockpiles in Korea, which is based on demand assumptions. These findings can serve as a basis for Korea's copper stockpiling policy and can be utilized to enhance resource security in preparation for possible future scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 105418"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007852","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the adequacy of copper stockpiles managed by the Korean government and proposes an economically optimal level from a strategic perspective. The Disruption-Risk model, a methodology that aims to maximize the net benefit of stockpiling by considering potential future demand and supply disruptions, was employed in this analysis. The analysis showed that stockpiling an additional 2400 metric tons above Korea's current target is an economically optimal strategy. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis showed that it is a rational decision for the government to engage in stockpiling activities rather than the private sector. It was found that it is essential to continuously increase and maintain stockpiles in line with Korea's evolving policy direction. The findings of this study employ statistical methods based on historical disruption data, which allows for a comparison with the prevailing approach to calculating stockpiles in Korea, which is based on demand assumptions. These findings can serve as a basis for Korea's copper stockpiling policy and can be utilized to enhance resource security in preparation for possible future scenarios.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用中断风险模型确定韩国铜库存的最优水平
本研究评估了韩国政府管理的铜储备的充分性,并从战略角度提出了经济上最优的水平。中断风险模型是一种通过考虑潜在的未来需求和供应中断来最大化库存净效益的方法。分析结果显示,比目前的目标多储备2400吨是经济上最优的战略。此外,敏感性分析表明,政府参与储备活动比民间参与储备活动更为理性。根据韩国的政策方向,有必要不断增加和维持库存。本研究的结果采用了基于历史中断数据的统计方法,这可以与基于需求假设的计算韩国库存的流行方法进行比较。这些发现可作为韩国铜储备政策的依据,并可用于加强资源安全,为未来可能出现的情况做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Do natural threats matter for natural resources rents? Global evidence Do political cooperations and regulations manage Africa's sustainable mineral policy? Transitioning the mining industry to a greener economy: An Asian perspective of mineral demand Understanding and defining the social license to operate: Social acceptance, local values, overall moral legitimacy, and ‘moral authority’ An overview of the coal circularity in Brazil: A new sustainable approach based on sampling method, characterization, and waste valorization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1