Roger Yeardley , Michael Penrose , Paola Rodríguez Montoyo , Mohamed Ateia
{"title":"Acute, chronic, and behavioral toxicity of fluorine-free foams to earthworm species Eisenia fetida and Dendrobaena veneta","authors":"Roger Yeardley , Michael Penrose , Paola Rodríguez Montoyo , Mohamed Ateia","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used as fire suppressants. Due to rising health and environmental concerns, fluorine-free foams (F3) are being developed and tested as safer alternatives. However, the impact of these replacement products on ecologically important earthworms has not been adequately studied. This study addresses this gap by comparing the acute, chronic, and behavioral effects of two F3 formulations, BioEx Ecopol and Angus Fire Jetfoam, with a commonly used PFAS-containing AFFF, Buckeye, on two species of earthworms. Soil treated with BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye at the maximum 3% concentration did not cause significant acute mortality in <em>Eisenia fetida</em>, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam resulted in 100% mortality at the same concentration. In a 28-day chronic test, weight loss was observed in <em>Dendrobaena veneta</em> worms exposed to soil treated with Angus Fire Jetfoam. Additionally, both <em>Eisenia fetida</em> and <em>Dendrobaena veneta</em> demonstrated almost complete avoidance of soils treated with any of the three foams at 3% concentration, indicating potential ecological effects despite lack of acute toxicity by two of the products. The differences in toxicity are likely due to the distinct chemical compositions and surfactant concentrations in these foams. BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye, despite their differing surfactant mixtures, exhibited lower acute toxicity, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam's high mortality rate points to a potentially problematic chemical formulation. By understanding the toxicity of current formulations, this study supports the ongoing development and evaluation of new fire suppression products, supporting the creation of safer technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":276,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":"369 ","pages":"Article 143860"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653524027620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used as fire suppressants. Due to rising health and environmental concerns, fluorine-free foams (F3) are being developed and tested as safer alternatives. However, the impact of these replacement products on ecologically important earthworms has not been adequately studied. This study addresses this gap by comparing the acute, chronic, and behavioral effects of two F3 formulations, BioEx Ecopol and Angus Fire Jetfoam, with a commonly used PFAS-containing AFFF, Buckeye, on two species of earthworms. Soil treated with BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye at the maximum 3% concentration did not cause significant acute mortality in Eisenia fetida, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam resulted in 100% mortality at the same concentration. In a 28-day chronic test, weight loss was observed in Dendrobaena veneta worms exposed to soil treated with Angus Fire Jetfoam. Additionally, both Eisenia fetida and Dendrobaena veneta demonstrated almost complete avoidance of soils treated with any of the three foams at 3% concentration, indicating potential ecological effects despite lack of acute toxicity by two of the products. The differences in toxicity are likely due to the distinct chemical compositions and surfactant concentrations in these foams. BioEx Ecopol and Buckeye, despite their differing surfactant mixtures, exhibited lower acute toxicity, whereas Angus Fire Jetfoam's high mortality rate points to a potentially problematic chemical formulation. By understanding the toxicity of current formulations, this study supports the ongoing development and evaluation of new fire suppression products, supporting the creation of safer technologies.
含全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的水成膜泡沫(AFFF)被广泛用作灭火剂。由于对健康和环境日益关注,无氟泡沫(F3)正在作为更安全的替代品进行开发和试验。然而,这些替代产品对生态上重要的蚯蚓的影响尚未得到充分的研究。本研究通过比较两种F3配方(BioEx Ecopol和Angus Fire Jetfoam)与常用的含有pfas的AFFF (Buckeye)对两种蚯蚓的急性、慢性和行为影响,解决了这一差距。在最大浓度为3%的土壤中,BioEx Ecopol和七叶树处理的土壤没有引起大飞天Eisenia fetida的显著急性死亡率,而在相同浓度下,Angus Fire Jetfoam的死亡率为100%。在一项为期28天的慢性试验中,观察到暴露于安格斯火焰喷射泡沫处理的土壤中的veneta石斛蠕虫体重减轻。此外,臭Eisenia fetida和Dendrobaena veneta几乎完全避免了三种浓度为3%的泡沫处理的土壤,这表明尽管两种产品缺乏急性毒性,但潜在的生态效应。毒性的差异很可能是由于这些泡沫中不同的化学成分和表面活性剂浓度。尽管BioEx Ecopol和Buckeye的表面活性剂混合物不同,但它们的急性毒性较低,而Angus Fire Jetfoam的高死亡率表明,这是一种潜在的有问题的化学配方。通过了解当前配方的毒性,本研究支持正在进行的新灭火产品的开发和评估,支持创建更安全的技术。
期刊介绍:
Chemosphere, being an international multidisciplinary journal, is dedicated to publishing original communications and review articles on chemicals in the environment. The scope covers a wide range of topics, including the identification, quantification, behavior, fate, toxicology, treatment, and remediation of chemicals in the bio-, hydro-, litho-, and atmosphere, ensuring the broad dissemination of research in this field.