Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: History, Indications, Design, Outcomes, and Complications

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.oto.2024.101149
J. Austin Stratton BS, Steve H. Bayer MD, Justin W. Arner MD
{"title":"Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: History, Indications, Design, Outcomes, and Complications","authors":"J. Austin Stratton BS,&nbsp;Steve H. Bayer MD,&nbsp;Justin W. Arner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.oto.2024.101149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become an increasingly common procedure with rapidly expanding indications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history of the rTSA, provide an overview of modern implant design, and discuss the expanding indications for primary rTSA, rTSA in the revision setting, and the associated outcomes. The Grammont rTSA was introduced in 1985 for the treatment of cuff tear arthroplasty (CTA). Due to complications including scapular notching, stress fracture of the acromion and scapular spine, and instability, subsequent iterations have included glenoid component lateralization, changes in glenoid baseplate positioning, variations in humeral neck shaft angle, and inlay vs onlay humeral component design. Modernization of the rTSA design has resulted in expanding indications beyond CTA, including irreparable cuff tear, primary osteoarthritis, and fracture. Modern rTSA designs have demonstrated improvement in patient reported outcomes and pain from preoperative baseline with high patient satisfaction. However, rates of scapular notching increase over time and functional outcomes remain limited by deficits in range of motion, especially with internal rotation. An ideal implant configuration has not been identified, but navigation and extended reality are emerging areas of study that may improve implant placement and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45242,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","volume":"34 4","pages":"Article 101149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048666624000582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become an increasingly common procedure with rapidly expanding indications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the history of the rTSA, provide an overview of modern implant design, and discuss the expanding indications for primary rTSA, rTSA in the revision setting, and the associated outcomes. The Grammont rTSA was introduced in 1985 for the treatment of cuff tear arthroplasty (CTA). Due to complications including scapular notching, stress fracture of the acromion and scapular spine, and instability, subsequent iterations have included glenoid component lateralization, changes in glenoid baseplate positioning, variations in humeral neck shaft angle, and inlay vs onlay humeral component design. Modernization of the rTSA design has resulted in expanding indications beyond CTA, including irreparable cuff tear, primary osteoarthritis, and fracture. Modern rTSA designs have demonstrated improvement in patient reported outcomes and pain from preoperative baseline with high patient satisfaction. However, rates of scapular notching increase over time and functional outcomes remain limited by deficits in range of motion, especially with internal rotation. An ideal implant configuration has not been identified, but navigation and extended reality are emerging areas of study that may improve implant placement and patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反向肩关节置换术:历史、适应症、设计、结果和并发症
反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)已成为一种越来越普遍的手术,适应症迅速扩大。本综述的目的是总结rTSA的历史,提供现代种植体设计的概述,并讨论原发性rTSA的适应症,rTSA在翻修环境中的应用,以及相关的结果。gramont rTSA于1985年推出,用于治疗袖带撕裂关节成形术(CTA)。由于并发症包括肩胛骨切迹、肩峰和肩胛骨应力性骨折以及不稳定,随后的迭代包括肩胛假体偏侧、肩胛基板定位的改变、肱骨颈轴角度的变化以及肩关节假体的镶嵌与镶嵌设计。rTSA设计的现代化导致了CTA以外适应症的扩大,包括不可修复的袖带撕裂、原发性骨关节炎和骨折。现代rTSA设计已经证明了患者报告的结果和术前基线疼痛的改善,患者满意度高。然而,随着时间的推移,肩胛骨切迹的发生率增加,功能结果仍然受到活动范围的限制,特别是内旋。理想的种植体结构尚未确定,但导航和扩展现实是新兴的研究领域,可以改善种植体的放置和患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics is an innovative, richly illustrated resource that keeps practitioners informed of significant advances in all areas of surgical management. Each issue of this atlas-style journal explores a single topic, often offering alternate approaches to the same procedure. Its current, definitive information keeps readers in the forefront of their specialty.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board (pick up from previous issue w/updates) Table of Contents (pick up from previous issue w/updates) Contributors (pick up from previous issue w/updates) Shoulder Arthroplasty Revision Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Surgical Technique/Tips and Tricks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1