Assessing organic carbon sequestration in soil aggregates for building high quality carbon stocks in improved grazing lands

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109403
Tushar C. Sarker , Anil C. Somenahally , Adrian Romero , Monte Rouquette Jr. , Gerald Smith , Girisha Ganjegunte
{"title":"Assessing organic carbon sequestration in soil aggregates for building high quality carbon stocks in improved grazing lands","authors":"Tushar C. Sarker ,&nbsp;Anil C. Somenahally ,&nbsp;Adrian Romero ,&nbsp;Monte Rouquette Jr. ,&nbsp;Gerald Smith ,&nbsp;Girisha Ganjegunte","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil aggregation is critical for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and ecosystem services in improved grazing lands (IGLs). Evaluating soil aggregation under various IGL practices can better inform SOC accumulation potential. Assessing SOC within soil aggregates and examining quality indicators can provide additional insights for building stable SOC stocks. The objective of this study was to analyze soil aggregation and aggregate-SOC content and its quality parameters to evaluate the long-term (&gt;50 years) impacts of different grazing and fertilization practices on SOC-sequestration in comparison to a minimally managed native pine forestry site (FS). Experimental treatments in IGLs included two grazing pressures of high (HGP) and low (LGP), and two nitrogen (N) fertilization of either only organic-N (oN) through a legume rotation or only inorganic fertilized (iN). Soil cores collected from a 0–60 cm soil profiles were separated by depth, which were further separated into aggregate fractions through dry sieving. Individual aggregate fractions were analyzed for SOC content, CN ratio (CNR) and fungal to bacterial ratio (FBR) to evaluate the quantity and quality of SOC. Results indicated contrasting trends between soil aggregation and SOC in response to grazing and N management. Sand-free Mean Weight Diameter (sfMWD, mm 50 g<sup>–1</sup>) was higher in HGiN (1.03 mm), HGoN (1.00 mm), and in FS (0.95 mm) compared to LGoN (0.76 mm) and LGiN (0.65 mm). Whereas aggregate-SOC (g kg<sup>–1</sup>) and stocks (Mg ha<sup>–1</sup>) were significantly higher in LGiN (7.64 and 40.3, respectively) and LGoN (5.06 and 39.3, respectively), than HGoN (3.77 and 20.8, respectively) and HGiN (5.63 and 26.7, respectively), but comparable to FS (4.61 and 44.2, respectively). Higher SOC in LGP was largely due to higher independent-MOC (mineral occluded carbon in silt+clay). Higher soil aggregation under HGP did not increase SOC, confirming the potential loss due to overgrazing effects. Comparison of the summed-index based on several SOC quality indicators, including CNR and FBR, ranked FS highest, followed by LGoN and LGiN. Although LGiN accumulated the highest SOC stocks, a combined quantitative and qualitative assessment of SOC sequestration revealed that low intensity grazing with reduced N input and integration of legumes was a superior IGLs practice. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating aggregate-SOC quality parameters to evaluate SOC-sequestration potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"380 ","pages":"Article 109403"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924005218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil aggregation is critical for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and ecosystem services in improved grazing lands (IGLs). Evaluating soil aggregation under various IGL practices can better inform SOC accumulation potential. Assessing SOC within soil aggregates and examining quality indicators can provide additional insights for building stable SOC stocks. The objective of this study was to analyze soil aggregation and aggregate-SOC content and its quality parameters to evaluate the long-term (>50 years) impacts of different grazing and fertilization practices on SOC-sequestration in comparison to a minimally managed native pine forestry site (FS). Experimental treatments in IGLs included two grazing pressures of high (HGP) and low (LGP), and two nitrogen (N) fertilization of either only organic-N (oN) through a legume rotation or only inorganic fertilized (iN). Soil cores collected from a 0–60 cm soil profiles were separated by depth, which were further separated into aggregate fractions through dry sieving. Individual aggregate fractions were analyzed for SOC content, CN ratio (CNR) and fungal to bacterial ratio (FBR) to evaluate the quantity and quality of SOC. Results indicated contrasting trends between soil aggregation and SOC in response to grazing and N management. Sand-free Mean Weight Diameter (sfMWD, mm 50 g–1) was higher in HGiN (1.03 mm), HGoN (1.00 mm), and in FS (0.95 mm) compared to LGoN (0.76 mm) and LGiN (0.65 mm). Whereas aggregate-SOC (g kg–1) and stocks (Mg ha–1) were significantly higher in LGiN (7.64 and 40.3, respectively) and LGoN (5.06 and 39.3, respectively), than HGoN (3.77 and 20.8, respectively) and HGiN (5.63 and 26.7, respectively), but comparable to FS (4.61 and 44.2, respectively). Higher SOC in LGP was largely due to higher independent-MOC (mineral occluded carbon in silt+clay). Higher soil aggregation under HGP did not increase SOC, confirming the potential loss due to overgrazing effects. Comparison of the summed-index based on several SOC quality indicators, including CNR and FBR, ranked FS highest, followed by LGoN and LGiN. Although LGiN accumulated the highest SOC stocks, a combined quantitative and qualitative assessment of SOC sequestration revealed that low intensity grazing with reduced N input and integration of legumes was a superior IGLs practice. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating aggregate-SOC quality parameters to evaluate SOC-sequestration potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Assessing organic carbon sequestration in soil aggregates for building high quality carbon stocks in improved grazing lands Exploring the influence of cover crops with native plant species on soil and berry microbiota in a Moscatel Galego vineyard: Implications for sustainable viticulture Grassland irrigation and grazing prohibition have significantly affected vegetation and microbial diversity by changing soil temperature and moisture, evidences from a 6 years experiment of typical temperate grassland Effects of crop rotation on plant- and microbial-derived carbon within particulate and mineral fractions in paddy soils Long-term organic matter inputs enhance soil health and reduce soil-borne pathogen pressure in maize-bean rotations in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1