Distributional moderation analysis: Unpacking moderation effects in intervention research

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101399
Wolfgang Wiedermann, Wendy M. Reinke, Keith C. Herman
{"title":"Distributional moderation analysis: Unpacking moderation effects in intervention research","authors":"Wolfgang Wiedermann,&nbsp;Wendy M. Reinke,&nbsp;Keith C. Herman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Moderation and subgroup analyses are well-established statistical tools to evaluate whether intervention effects vary across subpopulations defined by participants' demographic and contextual factors. Moderation effects themselves, however, can be subject to heterogeneity and can manifest in various outcome parameters that go beyond group-specific averages (i.e., means) that are typically the focus of main and moderation effect analyses. The present study introduces distributional moderation analysis using the framework of inflated Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) that allows researchers to holistically characterize intervention effect modifiers through simultaneously modeling conditional mean-, variance-, skewness-, and kurtosis-based intervention effects, as well as moderated treatment effects located at the endpoints of the response scale (i.e., floor/ceiling effects). Data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of a teacher classroom management program on students' disruptive classroom behavior are used to provide a step-by-step guide for applying distributional moderation analysis in school-based intervention research. Although a traditional mean-focused analysis suggests that the intervention reduced students' average disruptive behavior only for students receiving special education, an evaluation of distributional treatment effects reveals a general decrease in the average disruptive behavior for at-risk students. In addition, distributional moderation analysis suggests that this average decrease is moderated by students' race and that the moderation effect of special education status initially seen in the traditional analysis is not located in the means, but in the chance to show no disruptive behavior patterns at all. Thus, we conclude that distributional moderation analysis constitutes a valuable complementary tool to provide a fine-grained characterization of treatment effect modifiers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524001195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moderation and subgroup analyses are well-established statistical tools to evaluate whether intervention effects vary across subpopulations defined by participants' demographic and contextual factors. Moderation effects themselves, however, can be subject to heterogeneity and can manifest in various outcome parameters that go beyond group-specific averages (i.e., means) that are typically the focus of main and moderation effect analyses. The present study introduces distributional moderation analysis using the framework of inflated Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) that allows researchers to holistically characterize intervention effect modifiers through simultaneously modeling conditional mean-, variance-, skewness-, and kurtosis-based intervention effects, as well as moderated treatment effects located at the endpoints of the response scale (i.e., floor/ceiling effects). Data from a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of a teacher classroom management program on students' disruptive classroom behavior are used to provide a step-by-step guide for applying distributional moderation analysis in school-based intervention research. Although a traditional mean-focused analysis suggests that the intervention reduced students' average disruptive behavior only for students receiving special education, an evaluation of distributional treatment effects reveals a general decrease in the average disruptive behavior for at-risk students. In addition, distributional moderation analysis suggests that this average decrease is moderated by students' race and that the moderation effect of special education status initially seen in the traditional analysis is not located in the means, but in the chance to show no disruptive behavior patterns at all. Thus, we conclude that distributional moderation analysis constitutes a valuable complementary tool to provide a fine-grained characterization of treatment effect modifiers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布调节分析:干预研究中的解包调节效应
适度和亚组分析是一种完善的统计工具,用于评估干预效果是否在由参与者的人口统计学和环境因素定义的亚人群中有所不同。然而,适度效应本身可能受到异质性的影响,并可能表现为超出特定群体平均值(即平均值)的各种结果参数,而这些参数通常是主要和适度效应分析的重点。本研究使用位置、规模和形状的膨胀广义可加模型(GAMLSS)框架引入了分布调节分析,该模型允许研究人员通过同时建模条件均值、方差、偏度和峰度为基础的干预效应,以及位于反应量表端点的调节治疗效应(即地板/天花板效应),来全面表征干预效应调节剂。一项评估教师课堂管理计划对学生破坏性课堂行为影响的大规模随机对照试验的数据,为在校本干预研究中应用分布适度分析提供了一步一步的指导。虽然传统的以均值为中心的分析表明,只有接受特殊教育的学生的干预减少了学生的平均破坏行为,但对分配治疗效果的评估显示,有风险的学生的平均破坏行为普遍减少。此外,分布调节分析表明,这种平均下降受到学生种族的调节,而传统分析中最初看到的特殊教育地位的调节作用并不在于平均数,而在于根本没有表现出破坏性行为模式的机会。因此,我们得出结论,分布适度分析构成了一个有价值的补充工具,以提供治疗效果调节剂的细粒度表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mixed methods systematic review: Using a cultural validity assessment to evaluate prevention programs for Indigenous students Using a naive Bayesian approach to identify academic risk based on multiple sources: A conceptual replication Learning from learning loss: Bayesian updating in academic universal screening during learning disruptions One model may not fit all: Subgroup detection using model-based recursive partitioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1