One model may not fit all: Subgroup detection using model-based recursive partitioning

IF 4.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of School Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101394
Marjolein Fokkema , Mirka Henninger , Carolin Strobl
{"title":"One model may not fit all: Subgroup detection using model-based recursive partitioning","authors":"Marjolein Fokkema ,&nbsp;Mirka Henninger ,&nbsp;Carolin Strobl","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Model-based recursive partitioning (MOB; Zeileis et al., 2008) is a flexible framework for detecting subgroups of persons showing different effects in a wide range of parametric models. It provides a versatile tool for detecting and explaining heterogeneity in, for example, intervention studies. In this tutorial article, we introduce the general MOB framework. In two specific case studies, we illustrate how MOB-based methods can be used to detect and explain heterogeneity in two widely used frameworks in educational studies: (a) The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and (b) item response theory (IRT). In the first case study, we show how GLMM trees (Fokkema et al., 2018) can be used to detect subgroups with different parameters in mixed-effects models. We apply GLMM trees to longitudinal data from a study on the effects of the Head Start pre-school program to identify subgroups of families where children show comparatively larger or smaller gains in performance. In a second case study, we show how Rasch trees (Strobl et al., 2015) can be used to detect subgroups with different item parameters in IRT models (i.e. differential item functioning [DIF]). DIF should be investigated before using test results for group comparisons. We show how a recently developed stopping criterion (Henninger et al., 2023) can be used to guide subgroup detection based on DIF effect sizes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 101394"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524001146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Model-based recursive partitioning (MOB; Zeileis et al., 2008) is a flexible framework for detecting subgroups of persons showing different effects in a wide range of parametric models. It provides a versatile tool for detecting and explaining heterogeneity in, for example, intervention studies. In this tutorial article, we introduce the general MOB framework. In two specific case studies, we illustrate how MOB-based methods can be used to detect and explain heterogeneity in two widely used frameworks in educational studies: (a) The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and (b) item response theory (IRT). In the first case study, we show how GLMM trees (Fokkema et al., 2018) can be used to detect subgroups with different parameters in mixed-effects models. We apply GLMM trees to longitudinal data from a study on the effects of the Head Start pre-school program to identify subgroups of families where children show comparatively larger or smaller gains in performance. In a second case study, we show how Rasch trees (Strobl et al., 2015) can be used to detect subgroups with different item parameters in IRT models (i.e. differential item functioning [DIF]). DIF should be investigated before using test results for group comparisons. We show how a recently developed stopping criterion (Henninger et al., 2023) can be used to guide subgroup detection based on DIF effect sizes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个模型可能不适用于所有模型:使用基于模型的递归分区进行子组检测
基于模型的递归分区;Zeileis et al., 2008)是一个灵活的框架,用于检测在广泛的参数模型中显示不同效果的人的子群体。它为检测和解释例如干预研究中的异质性提供了一个通用的工具。在这篇教程中,我们将介绍一般的MOB框架。在两个具体的案例研究中,我们说明了如何使用基于mobo的方法来检测和解释教育研究中两种广泛使用的框架中的异质性:(a)广义线性混合模型(GLMM)和(b)项目反应理论(IRT)。在第一个案例研究中,我们展示了如何使用GLMM树(Fokkema等人,2018)来检测混合效应模型中具有不同参数的子组。我们将GLMM树应用于一项关于学前教育项目效果研究的纵向数据,以确定儿童表现出相对较大或较小收益的家庭亚组。在第二个案例研究中,我们展示了如何使用Rasch树(strobel等人,2015)来检测IRT模型中具有不同项目参数的子组(即差异项目功能[DIF])。在使用测试结果进行组比较之前,应调查DIF。我们展示了最近开发的停止标准(Henninger et al., 2023)如何用于指导基于DIF效应大小的子组检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
期刊最新文献
Reporting guidelines for single-case experimental design research: Recommendations for data analysis Defending victimized peers in unique ways: Profiles and transitions in defending strategies and their associations with youth social-emotional adjustment A systematic review and single-case meta-analysis of performance feedback as teacher professional development Paradigm compatibility within school consultation: Offering insight into consultee resistance Understanding the interplay among parental involvement, parental self-regulation, and child adjustment: A latent profiles analysis and cross-validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1