Predicting abnormal C-reactive protein level for improving utilization by deep neural network model

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105726
Donghua Mo , Shilong Xiong , Tianxing Ji , Qiang Zhou , Qian Zheng
{"title":"Predicting abnormal C-reactive protein level for improving utilization by deep neural network model","authors":"Donghua Mo ,&nbsp;Shilong Xiong ,&nbsp;Tianxing Ji ,&nbsp;Qiang Zhou ,&nbsp;Qian Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker frequently used in clinical practice. However, insufficient evidence-based ordering inevitably results in its overuse or underuse. This study aims to predict its normal and abnormal levels using the deep neural network (DNN) models, helping clinicians order this item more appropriately and intelligently.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We considered complete blood count (CBC) parameters as feature vectors and 10 mg/L as a cutoff value for CRP. Several models, including linear support vector classification, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and DNN, were developed based on a dataset of 53834 medical records to predict binary output. We externally validated DNN models on independent 20723 samples through discrimination, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DNN models has the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Learning curves revealed that models’ AUC, balanced accuracy, and F1 score do not significantly and continuously improve following increasing data volume. In internal validation, the AUC, balanced accuracy, and the F1 score of 10 models were 0.818 (0.95 CI: 0.812-0.824), 0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.736-0.747), and 0.649 (0.95 CI: 0.643-0.656), respectively. These metrics were 0.817 (0.95 CI: 0.816-0.817), 0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.740-0.742), and 0.641 (0.95 CI: 0.640-0.642), respectively, in external validation. AUC and balanced accuracy shown no significant difference (P-values were 0.106 and 0.339). CRP10-C2 model has the lowest Brier score of 0.154, AUC of 0.818, and calibration curve formula of y=1.001x-0.010, which was identified as a target model to deploy in the app.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DNN models obtained moderate performance, surpassing baseline indices in distinguishing binary CRP levels. They are good generalizations and well-calibrated. The CRP-C2 model can enhance CRP utilization by informing the orders appropriately and can contribute to inflammatory diagnostics in primary health care where CBC is available, but the CRP test is inaccessible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105726"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an inflammatory biomarker frequently used in clinical practice. However, insufficient evidence-based ordering inevitably results in its overuse or underuse. This study aims to predict its normal and abnormal levels using the deep neural network (DNN) models, helping clinicians order this item more appropriately and intelligently.

Methods

We considered complete blood count (CBC) parameters as feature vectors and 10 mg/L as a cutoff value for CRP. Several models, including linear support vector classification, logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and DNN, were developed based on a dataset of 53834 medical records to predict binary output. We externally validated DNN models on independent 20723 samples through discrimination, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis.

Results

DNN models has the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Learning curves revealed that models’ AUC, balanced accuracy, and F1 score do not significantly and continuously improve following increasing data volume. In internal validation, the AUC, balanced accuracy, and the F1 score of 10 models were 0.818 (0.95 CI: 0.812-0.824), 0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.736-0.747), and 0.649 (0.95 CI: 0.643-0.656), respectively. These metrics were 0.817 (0.95 CI: 0.816-0.817), 0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.740-0.742), and 0.641 (0.95 CI: 0.640-0.642), respectively, in external validation. AUC and balanced accuracy shown no significant difference (P-values were 0.106 and 0.339). CRP10-C2 model has the lowest Brier score of 0.154, AUC of 0.818, and calibration curve formula of y=1.001x-0.010, which was identified as a target model to deploy in the app.

Conclusions

DNN models obtained moderate performance, surpassing baseline indices in distinguishing binary CRP levels. They are good generalizations and well-calibrated. The CRP-C2 model can enhance CRP utilization by informing the orders appropriately and can contribute to inflammatory diagnostics in primary health care where CBC is available, but the CRP test is inaccessible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度神经网络模型预测异常c反应蛋白水平,提高利用率
c反应蛋白(CRP)是临床中常用的炎症生物标志物。然而,基于证据的排序不足不可避免地导致其过度使用或使用不足。本研究旨在利用深度神经网络(DNN)模型预测其正常和异常水平,帮助临床医生更合理、更智能地订购该项目。方法以全血细胞计数(CBC)参数为特征向量,以10 mg/L为CRP的临界值。基于53834个医疗记录数据集,开发了线性支持向量分类、逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林和深度神经网络等模型来预测二进制输出。我们通过区分、校准曲线和决策曲线分析,在独立的20723个样本上对DNN模型进行了外部验证。结果dnn模型的受者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积最佳。学习曲线显示,随着数据量的增加,模型的AUC、平衡精度和F1分数没有显著的持续提高。在内部验证中,10个模型的AUC、平衡精度和F1评分分别为0.818 (0.95 CI: 0.812-0.824)、0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.736-0.747)和0.649 (0.95 CI: 0.643-0.656)。这些指标在外部验证中分别为0.817 (0.95 CI: 0.816-0.817)、0.741 (0.95 CI: 0.740-0.742)和0.641 (0.95 CI: 0.640-0.642)。AUC和平衡精度差异无统计学意义(p值分别为0.106和0.339)。CRP10-C2模型Brier评分最低,为0.154,AUC为0.818,校正曲线公式为y=1.001x-0.010,可作为应用中部署的目标模型。结论sdnn模型在判别二元CRP水平方面表现中等,优于基线指标。它们是很好的概括,而且校准得很好。CRP- c2模型可以通过适当地通知医嘱来提高CRP的利用率,并有助于在可获得CBC但无法获得CRP检测的初级卫生保健中进行炎症诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Research using smartwatches for the measurement of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep: A scoping review Characterizing nursing home care team communication via text messaging: A social network analysis Comparing large language models and human experts in interpreting MRI reports for personalized patient education Beyond the conventional: Artificial intelligence in identifying risk factors in sports injuries. A scoping review A visualized nurse-led ePRO system for chemotherapy toxicity: Content design and validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1