Yingming Zhu , Su Xu , Yu Zhou , Xuesong Guo , Yunping Han , Jun Zhan , Lin Li , Junxin Liu
{"title":"Occurrence characteristics, removal efficiencies and potential health risks of typical viruses in rural domestic sewage: A review","authors":"Yingming Zhu , Su Xu , Yu Zhou , Xuesong Guo , Yunping Han , Jun Zhan , Lin Li , Junxin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dissimilar sources, treatment processes, resource-oriented models, lack of disinfection, and proximity to living areas may contribute to distinct virus occurrence, removal efficiencies, and risks in rural compared to urban sewage. This study reviews research on viruses in rural domestic sewage from 2000 to 2024, comparing virus removal efficiencies of common rural treatment processes and identifying potential health risks. It finds that typical virus species in rural sewage resemble those in urban areas but at lower concentrations, with a higher prevalence of animal and plant viruses. The concentrations of typical virus range from 10<sup>2</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> GC/L in influent and 10<sup>0</sup> to 10<sup>6</sup> GC/L in effluent. Among existing treatment processes, ecological treatment is more effective in virus removal (0.6 log<sub>10</sub> to complete removal), whereas contact oxidation, commonly used in rural settings, has relatively low efficacy (0.2–3.0 log<sub>10</sub>). Effluent discharge (10<sup>1</sup>–10<sup>10</sup> GC/L), excess sludge utilization (10<sup>2</sup>–10<sup>10</sup> GC/(g wet wt.)), and fugitive gas (10<sup>3</sup>–10<sup>7</sup> GC/m<sup>3</sup>) from treatment processes heighten potential risks of virus exposure. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing research, enhancing understanding of the potential risks and research significance of viruses in rural domestic sewage. It underscores the importance of developing virus research and control strategies under current context and proposes several future research directions in conjunction with existing analyses, including migration pathways, detailed removal mechanism, control technologies, and comprehensive risk assessment of viruses in rural sewage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 106611"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424018439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dissimilar sources, treatment processes, resource-oriented models, lack of disinfection, and proximity to living areas may contribute to distinct virus occurrence, removal efficiencies, and risks in rural compared to urban sewage. This study reviews research on viruses in rural domestic sewage from 2000 to 2024, comparing virus removal efficiencies of common rural treatment processes and identifying potential health risks. It finds that typical virus species in rural sewage resemble those in urban areas but at lower concentrations, with a higher prevalence of animal and plant viruses. The concentrations of typical virus range from 102 to 108 GC/L in influent and 100 to 106 GC/L in effluent. Among existing treatment processes, ecological treatment is more effective in virus removal (0.6 log10 to complete removal), whereas contact oxidation, commonly used in rural settings, has relatively low efficacy (0.2–3.0 log10). Effluent discharge (101–1010 GC/L), excess sludge utilization (102–1010 GC/(g wet wt.)), and fugitive gas (103–107 GC/m3) from treatment processes heighten potential risks of virus exposure. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of existing research, enhancing understanding of the potential risks and research significance of viruses in rural domestic sewage. It underscores the importance of developing virus research and control strategies under current context and proposes several future research directions in conjunction with existing analyses, including migration pathways, detailed removal mechanism, control technologies, and comprehensive risk assessment of viruses in rural sewage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies