A large-scale group SLIM considering expert credibility under social network to estimate human error probabilities in the railway driving process

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110648
Jian-Lan Zhou , Ya-Lun Zhou , Ren-Bin Xiao
{"title":"A large-scale group SLIM considering expert credibility under social network to estimate human error probabilities in the railway driving process","authors":"Jian-Lan Zhou ,&nbsp;Ya-Lun Zhou ,&nbsp;Ren-Bin Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Large-scale Group Success Likelihood Index Method (LG-SLIM) can eliminate bias caused by a single expert in human error assessment. The traditional LG-SLIM uses trust degrees to cluster and reach a consensus. However, the existing clustering algorithms do not consider the trust degrees between a given pair of experts to be multiple and vary according to different evaluated tasks. Besides, the existing consensus models do not consider various combinations of the evaluated tasks and trusted experts’ professions when managing trust degrees and self-confidence. Therefore, the similarity-trust-based clustering algorithm is improved using the comprehensive trust degree integrated from diverse trust degrees concerning all evaluated tasks. Moreover, expert credibility is proposed to reflect the quality of the expert's evaluation results, determined by self-confidence and trust degree simultaneously according to various combinations of the expert profession and target task. Accordingly, under the social network derived from expert credibility, the incompatible outliers change their opinions by referring to the views of those with the highest expert credibility. Finally, the sensitivity experiment and comparative analysis verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. The proposed LG-SLIM model is useful for human error assessment when critical operations need many experts to obtain reliable and accurate results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 110648"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024007191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Large-scale Group Success Likelihood Index Method (LG-SLIM) can eliminate bias caused by a single expert in human error assessment. The traditional LG-SLIM uses trust degrees to cluster and reach a consensus. However, the existing clustering algorithms do not consider the trust degrees between a given pair of experts to be multiple and vary according to different evaluated tasks. Besides, the existing consensus models do not consider various combinations of the evaluated tasks and trusted experts’ professions when managing trust degrees and self-confidence. Therefore, the similarity-trust-based clustering algorithm is improved using the comprehensive trust degree integrated from diverse trust degrees concerning all evaluated tasks. Moreover, expert credibility is proposed to reflect the quality of the expert's evaluation results, determined by self-confidence and trust degree simultaneously according to various combinations of the expert profession and target task. Accordingly, under the social network derived from expert credibility, the incompatible outliers change their opinions by referring to the views of those with the highest expert credibility. Finally, the sensitivity experiment and comparative analysis verify the effectiveness of the proposed model. The proposed LG-SLIM model is useful for human error assessment when critical operations need many experts to obtain reliable and accurate results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑社会网络下专家可信度的大规模群体SLIM估计铁路驾驶过程中的人为错误概率
大规模群体成功可能性指数法(large - Group Success Likelihood Index Method, LG-SLIM)可以消除单个专家在人为错误评估中造成的偏差。传统的LG-SLIM使用信任度来聚类并达成共识。然而,现有的聚类算法没有考虑到给定专家对之间的信任程度是多重的,并且会根据评估任务的不同而变化。此外,现有的共识模型在管理信任程度和自信时,没有考虑被评估任务和被信任专家职业的各种组合。因此,对基于相似度信任的聚类算法进行改进,利用对所有被评估任务的不同信任程度进行综合信任程度的整合。此外,根据专家职业和目标任务的各种组合,提出了专家可信度,以反映专家评价结果的质量,由自信程度和信任程度同时确定。因此,在专家可信度衍生的社会网络下,不相容的离群值通过参考专家可信度最高的离群值的观点来改变自己的观点。最后,通过灵敏度实验和对比分析验证了所提模型的有效性。当关键操作需要许多专家才能获得可靠和准确的结果时,所提出的LG-SLIM模型可用于人为错误评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Image-based remaining useful life prediction through adaptation from simulation to experimental domain Unsupervised graph transfer network with hybrid attention mechanism for fault diagnosis under variable operating conditions A hybrid machine learning and simulation framework for modeling and understanding disinformation-induced disruptions in public transit systems Multiscenario deduction analysis for railway emergencies using knowledge metatheory and dynamic Bayesian networks Generalized reassigning transform: Algorithm and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1