Comprehensive evaluation of various CO2 capture technologies through rigorous simulation: Economic, equipment footprint, and environmental analysis

Shou-Feng Chang , Hsuan-Han Chiu , Han-Shu Jao , Jin Shang , Yu-Jeng Lin , Bor-Yih Yu
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of various CO2 capture technologies through rigorous simulation: Economic, equipment footprint, and environmental analysis","authors":"Shou-Feng Chang ,&nbsp;Hsuan-Han Chiu ,&nbsp;Han-Shu Jao ,&nbsp;Jin Shang ,&nbsp;Yu-Jeng Lin ,&nbsp;Bor-Yih Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The comprehensive evaluation of various CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies from multiple perspectives remains limited, yet it is crucial for the successful implementation and deployment of carbon capture solutions to achieve carbon neutrality. This study presents a framework for assessing representative CO<sub>2</sub> capture processes from key point sources through rigorous simulation. Eight scenarios were developed and compared, comprising four standalone processes (<em>i.e.</em>, physical absorption (PHYABS), chemical absorption (CHEABS), dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption (DRPSA) and pressure-temperature swing adsorption (PTSA)) and four hybrid processes that integrate different adsorption and absorption processes. To evaluate each scenario, an integrated indicator, the Economics, Equipment footprint, and Environmental Score (EEES), was introduced. Our results indicate that the standalone CHEABS exhibits the lowest EEES of 0.120, highlighting its technological readiness and superiority over other processes. In contrast, the standalone PHYABS (EEES=0.168) and the hybrid PHYABS/PTSA process (EEES=0.242) emerge as viable alternatives, balancing environmental performance with economic and spatial considerations. Standalone PTSA (EEES=0.465) and DRPSA (EEES=0.706) are less favorable because of their higher utility demands and larger equipment footprints. Similarly, hybrid processes, namely, DRPSA/CHEABS (EEES=0.891), CHEABS/PTSA (EEES=0.837), and DRPSA/PHYABS (EEES=0.784), are less advantageous across all three metrics. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses indicated that carbon permit prices exert a negligible effect on the process economics. Additionally, it appears that government subsidies may play a crucial role in facilitating the development of CO<sub>2</sub> capture technologies within the industrial sector. Overall, this study provides a robust framework for evaluating CO<sub>2</sub> capture processes and offers practical recommendations for technology deployment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656824001544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comprehensive evaluation of various CO2 capture technologies from multiple perspectives remains limited, yet it is crucial for the successful implementation and deployment of carbon capture solutions to achieve carbon neutrality. This study presents a framework for assessing representative CO2 capture processes from key point sources through rigorous simulation. Eight scenarios were developed and compared, comprising four standalone processes (i.e., physical absorption (PHYABS), chemical absorption (CHEABS), dual-reflux pressure swing adsorption (DRPSA) and pressure-temperature swing adsorption (PTSA)) and four hybrid processes that integrate different adsorption and absorption processes. To evaluate each scenario, an integrated indicator, the Economics, Equipment footprint, and Environmental Score (EEES), was introduced. Our results indicate that the standalone CHEABS exhibits the lowest EEES of 0.120, highlighting its technological readiness and superiority over other processes. In contrast, the standalone PHYABS (EEES=0.168) and the hybrid PHYABS/PTSA process (EEES=0.242) emerge as viable alternatives, balancing environmental performance with economic and spatial considerations. Standalone PTSA (EEES=0.465) and DRPSA (EEES=0.706) are less favorable because of their higher utility demands and larger equipment footprints. Similarly, hybrid processes, namely, DRPSA/CHEABS (EEES=0.891), CHEABS/PTSA (EEES=0.837), and DRPSA/PHYABS (EEES=0.784), are less advantageous across all three metrics. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses indicated that carbon permit prices exert a negligible effect on the process economics. Additionally, it appears that government subsidies may play a crucial role in facilitating the development of CO2 capture technologies within the industrial sector. Overall, this study provides a robust framework for evaluating CO2 capture processes and offers practical recommendations for technology deployment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过严格的模拟对各种二氧化碳捕获技术进行综合评估:经济、设备足迹和环境分析
从多个角度对各种二氧化碳捕获技术的综合评估仍然有限,但这对于成功实施和部署碳捕获解决方案以实现碳中和至关重要。本研究提出了一个框架,通过严格的模拟来评估来自关键点源的代表性二氧化碳捕获过程。开发并比较了八种方案,包括四种独立的过程(即物理吸收(PHYABS)、化学吸收(CHEABS)、双回流变压吸附(DRPSA)和变压-温吸附(PTSA))和四种混合过程,这些混合过程集成了不同的吸附和吸收过程。为了评估每种情况,引入了一个综合指标,即经济、设备足迹和环境评分(EEES)。我们的研究结果表明,独立的CHEABS表现出最低的EEES(0.120),突出了其技术成熟度和优于其他工艺的优势。相比之下,独立PHYABS (EEES=0.168)和混合PHYABS/PTSA工艺(EEES=0.242)成为可行的替代方案,在经济和空间考虑方面平衡了环境性能。独立PTSA (EEES=0.465)和DRPSA (EEES=0.706)不太有利,因为它们的效用要求更高,设备占地面积更大。同样,混合工艺,即DRPSA/CHEABS (EEES=0.891), CHEABS/PTSA (EEES=0.837)和DRPSA/PHYABS (EEES=0.784),在所有三个指标上都不太有利。此外,敏感性分析表明,碳许可价格对过程经济的影响可以忽略不计。此外,政府补贴似乎在促进工业部门二氧化碳捕集技术的发展方面发挥了至关重要的作用。总的来说,这项研究为评估二氧化碳捕获过程提供了一个强有力的框架,并为技术部署提供了实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene with CO2 via Mg-Al spinel catalysts: Insight into dehydrogenation mechanism Methane and CO2 consumption from a synthetic waste gas by microbial communities in enriched seawater Addressing solar power curtailment by integrating flexible direct air capture Single-component and binary H2O and CO2 co-adsorption isotherm model on amine-functionalised Mg-Al mixed metal oxides Carbonated waste paste calcined clay cement with enhanced CO2 mineralization and early strength
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1