Refreshing the conversation about adaptation and perceived numerosity: A reply to Yousif, Clarke and Brannon

IF 2.8 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105883

Frank H. Durgin

{"title":"Refreshing the conversation about adaptation and perceived numerosity: A reply to Yousif, Clarke and Brannon","authors":"Frank H. Durgin","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>Yousif et al. (2024)</span></span> have raised a number of pertinent objections to the idea that number adaptation is a straightforward account of the readily-observable aftereffects that affect perceived numerosity. Their criticisms appear well-motivated, but their particular version of the old-news proposal, involving specific dots, may be insufficiently abstract given that adaptation accumulates. Two new experiments are presented that are meant to buttress their critique by (1) confirming their predictions concerning neutral adaptation, and (2) re-evaluating related claims concerning number vs. density comparisons that have been widely accepted. Present behavioral evidence dissociating effects of adapter size, adapter number and adapter density, supports the idea that density adaptation is implicated as a primary source of most phenomenologically-compelling aftereffects of perceived numerosity.</div><div>Experiment 2 was preregistered on <span><span>AsPredicted.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>. The pre-registration is available at the following link: <span><span>https://aspredicted.org/PC7_2ZB</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div><div>The full raw data sets for the two experiments reported her are available on OSF at the following links:</div><div>Experiment 1: <span><span>https://osf.io/b9qwy/?view_only=73beb62d9c2046c3aa08cdeb96cd5cca</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div><div>Experiment 2: <span><span>https://osf.io/6ax5j/?view_only=723ceb0b44da47dba99e56db12db02a9</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001690","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Yousif et al. (2024) have raised a number of pertinent objections to the idea that number adaptation is a straightforward account of the readily-observable aftereffects that affect perceived numerosity. Their criticisms appear well-motivated, but their particular version of the old-news proposal, involving specific dots, may be insufficiently abstract given that adaptation accumulates. Two new experiments are presented that are meant to buttress their critique by (1) confirming their predictions concerning neutral adaptation, and (2) re-evaluating related claims concerning number vs. density comparisons that have been widely accepted. Present behavioral evidence dissociating effects of adapter size, adapter number and adapter density, supports the idea that density adaptation is implicated as a primary source of most phenomenologically-compelling aftereffects of perceived numerosity.

Experiment 2 was preregistered on AsPredicted.org. The pre-registration is available at the following link: https://aspredicted.org/PC7_2ZB

The full raw data sets for the two experiments reported her are available on OSF at the following links:

Experiment 1: https://osf.io/b9qwy/?view_only=73beb62d9c2046c3aa08cdeb96cd5cca

Experiment 2: https://osf.io/6ax5j/?view_only=723ceb0b44da47dba99e56db12db02a9

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

283

期刊介绍： Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.

期刊最新文献

Editorial Board Number adaptation: Reply Refreshing the conversation about adaptation and perceived numerosity: A reply to Yousif, Clarke and Brannon Exploring the hierarchical structure of human plans via program generation The holistic forgetting of events and the (sometimes) fragmented forgetting of objects