Diagnostics and Prognostics in Power Plants: A systematic review

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Reliability Engineering & System Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110663
Wei Cheng , Hassaan Ahmad , Lin Gao , Ji Xing , Zelin Nie , Xuefeng Chen , Zhao Xu , Rongyong Zhang
{"title":"Diagnostics and Prognostics in Power Plants: A systematic review","authors":"Wei Cheng ,&nbsp;Hassaan Ahmad ,&nbsp;Lin Gao ,&nbsp;Ji Xing ,&nbsp;Zelin Nie ,&nbsp;Xuefeng Chen ,&nbsp;Zhao Xu ,&nbsp;Rongyong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2024.110663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Failures in power plants can lead to significant power interruptions and economic losses. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) serves as a predictive maintenance technique by detecting and diagnosing faults while forecasting potential failures. This systematic review analyzes trends in diagnosis and prognosis in power plants using scientometric analysis, summarizes the datasets and components targeted by researchers, outlines the advantages and drawbacks of popular methods, and reports detailed methodologies from selected literature. The complex nature of power plants presents significant challenges for implementing PHM effectively. Data-driven techniques, particularly machine learning and deep learning, have emerged as popular solutions to address these challenges. While diagnostic methods have seen substantial advancements, prognostics in power plants remain underdeveloped and require further investigation. This paper discusses the challenges associated with fault diagnosis and prognosis, emphasizing that addressing these issues could significantly enhance the effectiveness of PHM. By reviewing recent methodological advancements, summarizing the pros and cons of various methods, and identifying key challenges, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the field and highlights opportunities for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 110663"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024007348","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failures in power plants can lead to significant power interruptions and economic losses. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) serves as a predictive maintenance technique by detecting and diagnosing faults while forecasting potential failures. This systematic review analyzes trends in diagnosis and prognosis in power plants using scientometric analysis, summarizes the datasets and components targeted by researchers, outlines the advantages and drawbacks of popular methods, and reports detailed methodologies from selected literature. The complex nature of power plants presents significant challenges for implementing PHM effectively. Data-driven techniques, particularly machine learning and deep learning, have emerged as popular solutions to address these challenges. While diagnostic methods have seen substantial advancements, prognostics in power plants remain underdeveloped and require further investigation. This paper discusses the challenges associated with fault diagnosis and prognosis, emphasizing that addressing these issues could significantly enhance the effectiveness of PHM. By reviewing recent methodological advancements, summarizing the pros and cons of various methods, and identifying key challenges, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the field and highlights opportunities for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电厂诊断与预测:系统回顾
发电厂的故障会导致严重的电力中断和经济损失。预测和健康管理(PHM)作为一种预测性维护技术,在预测潜在故障的同时检测和诊断故障。本系统综述分析了利用科学计量学分析在电厂诊断和预后方面的趋势,总结了研究人员针对的数据集和组成部分,概述了流行方法的优缺点,并从选定的文献中报告了详细的方法。电厂的复杂性为有效实施PHM提出了重大挑战。数据驱动技术,特别是机器学习和深度学习,已经成为应对这些挑战的流行解决方案。虽然诊断方法已经取得了实质性的进步,但电厂的预后仍然不发达,需要进一步的研究。本文讨论了与故障诊断和预测相关的挑战,强调解决这些问题可以显著提高PHM的有效性。通过回顾最近的方法进展,总结各种方法的优缺点,并确定关键挑战,本文有助于加深对该领域的理解,并强调未来研究的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Image-based remaining useful life prediction through adaptation from simulation to experimental domain Unsupervised graph transfer network with hybrid attention mechanism for fault diagnosis under variable operating conditions A hybrid machine learning and simulation framework for modeling and understanding disinformation-induced disruptions in public transit systems Multiscenario deduction analysis for railway emergencies using knowledge metatheory and dynamic Bayesian networks Generalized reassigning transform: Algorithm and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1