Predictors of End-of-Life Care in Nonelderly Adults With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.046
Morgan Tentis BA, Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir MD, Courtney J. Pokrzywa MD, Colleen Trevino PhD, Daniel N. Holena MD, Patrick B. Murphy MD, Thomas W. Carver MD, Jacob Peschman MD, Marc A. de Moya MD, Lewis B. Somberg MD, Rachel S. Morris MD
{"title":"Predictors of End-of-Life Care in Nonelderly Adults With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury","authors":"Morgan Tentis BA,&nbsp;Abdul Hafiz Al Tannir MD,&nbsp;Courtney J. Pokrzywa MD,&nbsp;Colleen Trevino PhD,&nbsp;Daniel N. Holena MD,&nbsp;Patrick B. Murphy MD,&nbsp;Thomas W. Carver MD,&nbsp;Jacob Peschman MD,&nbsp;Marc A. de Moya MD,&nbsp;Lewis B. Somberg MD,&nbsp;Rachel S. Morris MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.10.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older age is a well-established risk factor for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WDLST) and discharge to hospice (DH) in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a paucity of data exists in identifying factors associated with end-of-life (EoL) care in younger patients with TBI. We sought to identify hospital and patient factors associated with EoL care and timing of EoL care in younger adults with severe TBI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Databank (2019). Adults (18-65 y) with severe TBI (Glasgow coma scale &lt;9) were included in the analysis. Inclusion criteria included death, WDLST, or DH during the hospital stay. Exclusion criteria included Glasgow coma scale &gt;8, death in the emergency department, and missing WDLST status. The primary outcome was EoL Care defined as those who either underwent WDLST or DH. The secondary outcome was early EoL care defined as EoL care within 72 h of admission.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1239 patients were included in the study, the median age was 43 y, and the majority were males (77%) and of white race (68%). A total of 667 (54%) patients underwent EoL Care. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (adjusted odd's ratio [aOR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03) and chronic alcoholism (aOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05-3.03) were independently associated with EoL. Conversely, patients of Black race (aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.22-0.49) and those admitted to university hospitals (odd's ratio 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.74) and level II trauma centers (odd's ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.37-0.88) were less likely to undergo EoL care. A total of 225 (34%) patients underwent early EoL Care. On multivariable analysis, presence of nonreactive pupils and absence of intracranial pressure monitor were independently associated with early EoL care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant variation in EoL care exists in patients presenting with severe TBI. Better understanding of patient and hospital factors that influence these complex decisions may allow for targeted interventions to reduce variability in EoL practice in TBI across institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"304 ","pages":"Pages 348-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424007157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Older age is a well-established risk factor for withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WDLST) and discharge to hospice (DH) in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a paucity of data exists in identifying factors associated with end-of-life (EoL) care in younger patients with TBI. We sought to identify hospital and patient factors associated with EoL care and timing of EoL care in younger adults with severe TBI.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Databank (2019). Adults (18-65 y) with severe TBI (Glasgow coma scale <9) were included in the analysis. Inclusion criteria included death, WDLST, or DH during the hospital stay. Exclusion criteria included Glasgow coma scale >8, death in the emergency department, and missing WDLST status. The primary outcome was EoL Care defined as those who either underwent WDLST or DH. The secondary outcome was early EoL care defined as EoL care within 72 h of admission.

Results

A total of 1239 patients were included in the study, the median age was 43 y, and the majority were males (77%) and of white race (68%). A total of 667 (54%) patients underwent EoL Care. On multivariable analysis, increasing age (adjusted odd's ratio [aOR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.03) and chronic alcoholism (aOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05-3.03) were independently associated with EoL. Conversely, patients of Black race (aOR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.22-0.49) and those admitted to university hospitals (odd's ratio 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.74) and level II trauma centers (odd's ratio 0.57; 95% CI 0.37-0.88) were less likely to undergo EoL care. A total of 225 (34%) patients underwent early EoL Care. On multivariable analysis, presence of nonreactive pupils and absence of intracranial pressure monitor were independently associated with early EoL care.

Conclusions

Significant variation in EoL care exists in patients presenting with severe TBI. Better understanding of patient and hospital factors that influence these complex decisions may allow for targeted interventions to reduce variability in EoL practice in TBI across institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非老年严重创伤性脑损伤患者临终关怀的预测因素
年龄是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者停止生命维持治疗(WDLST)和出院到临终关怀(DH)的一个公认的危险因素。然而,在确定与年轻TBI患者生命末期(EoL)护理相关的因素方面,缺乏数据。我们试图确定医院和患者因素与严重创伤性脑损伤的年轻成人EoL护理和EoL护理时间相关。方法对国家创伤数据库(2019)进行回顾性分析。严重TBI的成人(18-65岁)(格拉斯哥昏迷量表<;9)被纳入分析。纳入标准包括住院期间死亡、WDLST或DH。排除标准包括格拉斯哥昏迷评分>;8,急诊科死亡,无WDLST状态。主要结局是EoL护理,定义为接受WDLST或DH的患者。次要结果是早期EoL护理,定义为入院72小时内的EoL护理。结果共纳入1239例患者,中位年龄43岁,以男性(77%)和白人(68%)居多。共有667例(54%)患者接受了EoL护理。在多变量分析中,年龄增加(经调整的奇数比[aOR]: 1.02;95%可信区间[CI]: 1.01-1.03)和慢性酒精中毒(aOR: 1.78;95% CI: 1.05-3.03)与EoL独立相关。相反,黑人患者(aOR: 0.33;95% CI: 0.22-0.49)、大学医院(odd’s ratio 0.51 95% CI 0.33-0.74)和二级创伤中心(odd’s ratio 0.57;95% CI 0.37-0.88)接受EoL护理的可能性较低。共有225例(34%)患者接受了早期EoL护理。在多变量分析中,无反应性瞳孔和未使用颅内压监护仪与早期EoL护理独立相关。结论严重创伤性脑损伤患者EoL护理存在显著差异。更好地了解影响这些复杂决策的患者和医院因素,可能有助于采取有针对性的干预措施,以减少各机构在创伤性脑损伤中EoL实践的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Whole Blood Requirements in Civilian Trauma Resuscitation: Implications for Blood Inventory Program The Hidden Overlap Between Patient Group Means in Bariatric Randomized Controlled Trials Testing ChatGPT's Ability to Provide Patient and Physician Information on Aortic Aneurysm Short-Term Exposure to Ambient Particulate Matter Pollution and Surgical Outcomes Contemporary Management of Malignant Ascites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1