Trade sanctions and Global Value Chains: A China–South Africa perspective

IF 5.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102300
Randolph Luca Bruno , Maria Cipollina , Silvia Dal Bianco
{"title":"Trade sanctions and Global Value Chains: A China–South Africa perspective","authors":"Randolph Luca Bruno ,&nbsp;Maria Cipollina ,&nbsp;Silvia Dal Bianco","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China has been an important trade partner for many African countries, and in particular for South Africa, whose trade volume with China has increased significantly over the past decades. Changes of global trade and Global Value Chains (GVCs) dynamics as response of increasing trade sanctions bring substantial economic challenges for both countries directly involved and countries not directly involved by sanctions. On the one hand, trade sanctions have direct effects on sanctioned countries. On the other, sanctions can have significant indirect effects on countries not involved, as a consequence of trade diversion, changes in comparative advantages, and geopolitical realignment. The paper provides an empirical assessment of Global Value Chains’ re-organization by China and African countries in the age of trade sanctions. It explores and quantifies the intertwined relationship between trade sanctions, GVCs participation, and Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), with a focus on the dyad China–South Africa in a comparative perspective vis-á-vis other Chinese trade partners. The analysis is based on a purpose-built dataset covering GVCs participation indexes on 66 origin and destination countries for 68 industries (ISIC Rev.4) over the period 2005–2018. A simplified evolutionary model shows how the indirect effect of sanctions on forward GVCs could be positive and sizable, the mechanism being the displacement of (heterogeneous) inefficient firms with (heterogeneous) more efficient ones; while the indirect effect of sanctions on backward GVCs is indeterminate. By zooming onto the China–South Africa relations, the paper sheds new light on the consequences of sanctions, as perceived from both buyer’s (backward) and seller’s (forward) perspective, in a so-called South–South trade partnership.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24001895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China has been an important trade partner for many African countries, and in particular for South Africa, whose trade volume with China has increased significantly over the past decades. Changes of global trade and Global Value Chains (GVCs) dynamics as response of increasing trade sanctions bring substantial economic challenges for both countries directly involved and countries not directly involved by sanctions. On the one hand, trade sanctions have direct effects on sanctioned countries. On the other, sanctions can have significant indirect effects on countries not involved, as a consequence of trade diversion, changes in comparative advantages, and geopolitical realignment. The paper provides an empirical assessment of Global Value Chains’ re-organization by China and African countries in the age of trade sanctions. It explores and quantifies the intertwined relationship between trade sanctions, GVCs participation, and Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), with a focus on the dyad China–South Africa in a comparative perspective vis-á-vis other Chinese trade partners. The analysis is based on a purpose-built dataset covering GVCs participation indexes on 66 origin and destination countries for 68 industries (ISIC Rev.4) over the period 2005–2018. A simplified evolutionary model shows how the indirect effect of sanctions on forward GVCs could be positive and sizable, the mechanism being the displacement of (heterogeneous) inefficient firms with (heterogeneous) more efficient ones; while the indirect effect of sanctions on backward GVCs is indeterminate. By zooming onto the China–South Africa relations, the paper sheds new light on the consequences of sanctions, as perceived from both buyer’s (backward) and seller’s (forward) perspective, in a so-called South–South trade partnership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易制裁与全球价值链:中南视角
中国是许多非洲国家的重要贸易伙伴,尤其是南非。过去几十年,南非与中国的贸易额大幅增长。随着贸易制裁的增加,全球贸易和全球价值链的动态发生了变化,给直接受到制裁的国家和未受到制裁的国家带来了巨大的经济挑战。一方面,贸易制裁对被制裁国家有直接影响。另一方面,由于贸易转移、比较优势的变化和地缘政治的重新调整,制裁可能对未参与的国家产生重大的间接影响。本文对中国和非洲国家在贸易制裁时代的全球价值链重组进行了实证评估。本文探讨并量化了贸易制裁、全球价值链参与和显性比较优势(RCA)之间的相互交织关系,并将重点放在中国-南非与-á-vis其他中国贸易伙伴的比较角度上。该分析基于一个专门构建的数据集,该数据集涵盖了2005-2018年期间66个原产国和目的地国68个行业的全球价值链参与指数(ISIC Rev.4)。一个简化的演化模型表明,制裁对正向全球价值链的间接影响可能是积极和可观的,其机制是(异质)低效企业被(异质)更高效企业取代;而制裁对落后全球价值链的间接影响是不确定的。通过聚焦中南关系,本文从买方(后向)和卖方(前向)的角度,揭示了在所谓的南南贸易伙伴关系中,制裁的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
The green promise of digital finance: Exploring its effects and mechanisms on carbon reduction China's aid-giving modalities: Impacts on sustainable growth in China-Africa trade Productivity implications of inefficient environmental regulation: Evidence from China “A tale of two rails”: Transportation infrastructure and technological spillovers from R&D center foreign firms Broadband internet and income inequality among the floating population: Evidence from the “broadband China” strategy in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1