The holistic forgetting of events and the (sometimes) fragmented forgetting of objects

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106017
Nora Andermane , Arianna Moccia , Chong Zhai , Lisa M. Henderson , Aidan J. Horner
{"title":"The holistic forgetting of events and the (sometimes) fragmented forgetting of objects","authors":"Nora Andermane ,&nbsp;Arianna Moccia ,&nbsp;Chong Zhai ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Henderson ,&nbsp;Aidan J. Horner","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Episodic events are typically retrieved and forgotten holistically. If you recall one element (e.g., a person), you are more likely to recall other elements from the same event (e.g., the location), a pattern that is retained over time in the presence of forgetting. In contrast, representations of individual items, such as objects, may be less coherently bound, such that object features are forgotten at different rates and retrieval dependency decreases across delay. To test the theoretical prediction that forgetting qualitatively differs across levels in a representational hierarchy, we investigated the potential dissociation between event and item memory across five experiments. Participants encoded three-element events comprising images of famous people, locations, and objects. We measured retrieval accuracy and the dependency between the retrieval of event associations and object features, immediately after encoding and after various delays (5 h to 3 days). Across experiments, retrieval accuracy decreased for both events and objects over time, revealing forgetting. Retrieval dependency for event elements (i.e., people, locations, and objects) did not change over time, suggesting the holistic forgetting of events. Retrieval dependency for object features (i.e., state and colour) was more variable. Depending on encoding and delay conditions across the experiments, we observed both fragmentation and holistic forgetting of object features. Our results suggest that event representations remain coherent over time, whereas object representations can, but do not always, fragment. This provides support for our representational hierarchy framework of forgetting, however there are (still to be determined) boundary conditions in relation to the fragmentation of object representations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 106017"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724003032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Episodic events are typically retrieved and forgotten holistically. If you recall one element (e.g., a person), you are more likely to recall other elements from the same event (e.g., the location), a pattern that is retained over time in the presence of forgetting. In contrast, representations of individual items, such as objects, may be less coherently bound, such that object features are forgotten at different rates and retrieval dependency decreases across delay. To test the theoretical prediction that forgetting qualitatively differs across levels in a representational hierarchy, we investigated the potential dissociation between event and item memory across five experiments. Participants encoded three-element events comprising images of famous people, locations, and objects. We measured retrieval accuracy and the dependency between the retrieval of event associations and object features, immediately after encoding and after various delays (5 h to 3 days). Across experiments, retrieval accuracy decreased for both events and objects over time, revealing forgetting. Retrieval dependency for event elements (i.e., people, locations, and objects) did not change over time, suggesting the holistic forgetting of events. Retrieval dependency for object features (i.e., state and colour) was more variable. Depending on encoding and delay conditions across the experiments, we observed both fragmentation and holistic forgetting of object features. Our results suggest that event representations remain coherent over time, whereas object representations can, but do not always, fragment. This provides support for our representational hierarchy framework of forgetting, however there are (still to be determined) boundary conditions in relation to the fragmentation of object representations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Number adaptation: Reply Refreshing the conversation about adaptation and perceived numerosity: A reply to Yousif, Clarke and Brannon Exploring the hierarchical structure of human plans via program generation The holistic forgetting of events and the (sometimes) fragmented forgetting of objects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1