Magnets, gatekeepers, surveillants, and refiners: The emergence of higher education institutions as migration governance actors in Australia, Canada, and Germany, 1990 to 2019

IF 2.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102490
Lisa Ruth Brunner , Roopa Desai Trilokekar , Simon Morris-Lange , Helen Liu , Melissa Laufer , Amira El Masri , Anumoni Joshi
{"title":"Magnets, gatekeepers, surveillants, and refiners: The emergence of higher education institutions as migration governance actors in Australia, Canada, and Germany, 1990 to 2019","authors":"Lisa Ruth Brunner ,&nbsp;Roopa Desai Trilokekar ,&nbsp;Simon Morris-Lange ,&nbsp;Helen Liu ,&nbsp;Melissa Laufer ,&nbsp;Amira El Masri ,&nbsp;Anumoni Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The globally circulating policy discourse ‘<em>international students are ideal immigrants</em>’ merges three policy arenas: economic immigration, higher education, and international student mobility. This is part of a relatively new <em>edugration</em> (education + immigration) policy context in which international students transition to permanent residency status after graduation through targeted immigration pathways. We utilize critical discourse analysis to systematically examine select federal policy documents during critical time periods in <em>edugration</em> policy formation across three comparator countries (Australia, Canada, and Germany) from 1990 to 2019. In examining the ripple effect of international student mobility as it intersects with immigration policy, we show the impact of this policy discourse on higher education institutions: in <em>edugration</em> contexts, higher education institutions play new migration governance roles as magnets, gatekeepers, surveillants, and refiners of future economic immigrants. This raises broader questions regarding the long-term implications of international student mobility for university-government relations and the societal roles of higher education institutions more generally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035524001757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The globally circulating policy discourse ‘international students are ideal immigrants’ merges three policy arenas: economic immigration, higher education, and international student mobility. This is part of a relatively new edugration (education + immigration) policy context in which international students transition to permanent residency status after graduation through targeted immigration pathways. We utilize critical discourse analysis to systematically examine select federal policy documents during critical time periods in edugration policy formation across three comparator countries (Australia, Canada, and Germany) from 1990 to 2019. In examining the ripple effect of international student mobility as it intersects with immigration policy, we show the impact of this policy discourse on higher education institutions: in edugration contexts, higher education institutions play new migration governance roles as magnets, gatekeepers, surveillants, and refiners of future economic immigrants. This raises broader questions regarding the long-term implications of international student mobility for university-government relations and the societal roles of higher education institutions more generally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁铁、看门人、监视者和精炼者:1990年至2019年澳大利亚、加拿大和德国高等教育机构作为移民治理参与者的出现
全球流传的政策话语“国际学生是理想移民”融合了三个政策领域:经济移民、高等教育和国际学生流动。这是一个相对较新的教育(教育+移民)政策背景的一部分,在这个背景下,国际学生在毕业后通过有针对性的移民途径过渡到永久居留身份。我们利用批判性话语分析系统地考察了1990年至2019年三个比较国(澳大利亚、加拿大和德国)在教育政策形成的关键时期选择的联邦政策文件。在研究国际学生流动与移民政策交叉时的连锁反应时,我们展示了这种政策话语对高等教育机构的影响:在教育背景下,高等教育机构扮演着新的移民治理角色,如磁铁、看门人、监督者和未来经济移民的精炼者。这就提出了更广泛的问题,即国际学生流动对大学-政府关系和高等教育机构的社会角色的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
期刊最新文献
The impact of classroom environment on students' willingness to communicate in foreign language learning Magnets, gatekeepers, surveillants, and refiners: The emergence of higher education institutions as migration governance actors in Australia, Canada, and Germany, 1990 to 2019 Examining how domains of functional difficulties affect children's school enrollment in Egypt Occupational classes and inequality in educational expenditures: Reproduction of social hierarchy through school education Teaching insertion policies in Mexico: Cognitive tools and ideological vindication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1