Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses

Q1 Arts and Humanities Computers and Composition Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102904
Daniel Libertz, Kamal Belmihoub, Constantin Schreiber, Lisa Blankenship
{"title":"Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses","authors":"Daniel Libertz,&nbsp;Kamal Belmihoub,&nbsp;Constantin Schreiber,&nbsp;Lisa Blankenship","doi":"10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all students have had some kind of experience with modalities beyond traditional, on-site teaching. We wanted to study how first-year writing students experienced different modalities (i.e., on-site, hybrid, and online) to learn more about how best to support students and faculty in the future. This paper presents results of a mixed-methods study investigating differences in first-year writing student levels of confusion, satisfaction with social interaction, and preferences for modality in learning about writing. We found significant differences (with mostly small effects and some medium and large effects) in lower levels of confusion and higher satisfaction with social interaction in on-site classes relative to hybrid and online classes. We also found that students preferred a modality for a writing class for different and sophisticated reasons. On the basis of these results, we recommend more support for teaching in all modalities, more investigation of strengths/weaknesses of synchronous and asynchronous approaches, and more support offered to students before and during their writing classes for how best to learn <em>how to learn</em> in a given modality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35773,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Composition","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102904"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Composition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S875546152400080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all students have had some kind of experience with modalities beyond traditional, on-site teaching. We wanted to study how first-year writing students experienced different modalities (i.e., on-site, hybrid, and online) to learn more about how best to support students and faculty in the future. This paper presents results of a mixed-methods study investigating differences in first-year writing student levels of confusion, satisfaction with social interaction, and preferences for modality in learning about writing. We found significant differences (with mostly small effects and some medium and large effects) in lower levels of confusion and higher satisfaction with social interaction in on-site classes relative to hybrid and online classes. We also found that students preferred a modality for a writing class for different and sophisticated reasons. On the basis of these results, we recommend more support for teaching in all modalities, more investigation of strengths/weaknesses of synchronous and asynchronous approaches, and more support offered to students before and during their writing classes for how best to learn how to learn in a given modality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为新范式做准备:现场、混合和在线写作课程中学生体验的混合方法研究
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,几乎所有学生都有过传统现场教学之外的某种形式的经验。我们想研究一年级的写作学生如何经历不同的模式(即,现场,混合和在线),以了解更多关于如何在未来最好地支持学生和教师。本文介绍了一项混合方法研究的结果,该研究调查了一年级写作学生在学习写作时的困惑程度、对社会互动的满意度和对形式的偏好。我们发现,与混合课程和在线课程相比,现场课程在较低的困惑水平和较高的社会互动满意度方面存在显著差异(主要是小影响,一些中等和较大的影响)。我们还发现,学生对写作课的偏好有不同而复杂的原因。在这些结果的基础上,我们建议对所有形式的教学给予更多的支持,对同步和异步方法的优缺点进行更多的调查,并在写作课前和课中为学生提供更多的支持,以帮助他们最好地学习如何在给定的形式下学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers and Composition
Computers and Composition Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Composition: An International Journal is devoted to exploring the use of computers in writing classes, writing programs, and writing research. It provides a forum for discussing issues connected with writing and computer use. It also offers information about integrating computers into writing programs on the basis of sound theoretical and pedagogical decisions, and empirical evidence. It welcomes articles, reviews, and letters to the Editors that may be of interest to readers, including descriptions of computer-aided writing and/or reading instruction, discussions of topics related to computer use of software development; explorations of controversial ethical, legal, or social issues related to the use of computers in writing programs.
期刊最新文献
Preparing for a new paradigm: A mixed-methods study of student experience in on-site, hybrid, and online writing courses Integrating generative AI into digital multimodal composition: A study of multicultural second-language classrooms Purposeful remixing with generative AI: Constructing designer voice in multimodal composing Student use of generative AI as a composing process supplement: Concerns for intellectual property and academic honesty Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1