{"title":"Enhancing Part-Load performance of the simple recuperated supercritical carbon dioxide cycle through shaft separation","authors":"Seongmin Son","doi":"10.1016/j.tsep.2024.103074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, the operability of a simple recuperated supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO<sub>2</sub>) cycle under off-design conditions, specifically during part-load operation, was quantitatively analyzed by implementing shaft separation to place a compressor-driving turbine (CDT). For off-design evaluation, both the heat exchanger and turbomachinery were designed in one dimension before being inserted into the off-design platform of the system. To ensure physical consistency, all turbines were designed using the same set of loss models. The analysis results revealed that the efficiency of the single-shaft configuration decreased by about 12 %p at 10 % output, while that of the separated-shaft configuration decreased by < 8 %p under the same conditions. The arrangement of the CDT and power turbine had minimal impacts on off-design performance. The power required to drive the CDT–compressor operating at the optimal Revolution Per Minuate was found to be less than 5 % of the design output. These findings imply that layout modifications can enhance overall off-design efficiency and that the incorporation of a motor that supplies about 5 % of the design output for the CDT–compressor set significantly improves part-load operability. This requirement is practical, as such a motor is typically required for startup procedures. Although these results were obtained from the simplest recuperated S-CO<sub>2</sub> cycle, similar approaches could enhance off-design performance in more complex cycles such as waste heat recovery or S-CO<sub>2</sub> recompression cycles. The findings of this study demonstrate that altering the shaft arrangement while considering off-design operability can significantly enhance the operability of S-CO<sub>2</sub> systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23062,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 103074"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Science and Engineering Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451904924006929","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, the operability of a simple recuperated supercritical carbon dioxide (S-CO2) cycle under off-design conditions, specifically during part-load operation, was quantitatively analyzed by implementing shaft separation to place a compressor-driving turbine (CDT). For off-design evaluation, both the heat exchanger and turbomachinery were designed in one dimension before being inserted into the off-design platform of the system. To ensure physical consistency, all turbines were designed using the same set of loss models. The analysis results revealed that the efficiency of the single-shaft configuration decreased by about 12 %p at 10 % output, while that of the separated-shaft configuration decreased by < 8 %p under the same conditions. The arrangement of the CDT and power turbine had minimal impacts on off-design performance. The power required to drive the CDT–compressor operating at the optimal Revolution Per Minuate was found to be less than 5 % of the design output. These findings imply that layout modifications can enhance overall off-design efficiency and that the incorporation of a motor that supplies about 5 % of the design output for the CDT–compressor set significantly improves part-load operability. This requirement is practical, as such a motor is typically required for startup procedures. Although these results were obtained from the simplest recuperated S-CO2 cycle, similar approaches could enhance off-design performance in more complex cycles such as waste heat recovery or S-CO2 recompression cycles. The findings of this study demonstrate that altering the shaft arrangement while considering off-design operability can significantly enhance the operability of S-CO2 systems.
期刊介绍:
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress (TSEP) publishes original, high-quality research articles that span activities ranging from fundamental scientific research and discussion of the more controversial thermodynamic theories, to developments in thermal engineering that are in many instances examples of the way scientists and engineers are addressing the challenges facing a growing population – smart cities and global warming – maximising thermodynamic efficiencies and minimising all heat losses. It is intended that these will be of current relevance and interest to industry, academia and other practitioners. It is evident that many specialised journals in thermal and, to some extent, in fluid disciplines tend to focus on topics that can be classified as fundamental in nature, or are ‘applied’ and near-market. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress will bridge the gap between these two areas, allowing authors to make an easy choice, should they or a journal editor feel that their papers are ‘out of scope’ when considering other journals. The range of topics covered by Thermal Science and Engineering Progress addresses the rapid rate of development being made in thermal transfer processes as they affect traditional fields, and important growth in the topical research areas of aerospace, thermal biological and medical systems, electronics and nano-technologies, renewable energy systems, food production (including agriculture), and the need to minimise man-made thermal impacts on climate change. Review articles on appropriate topics for TSEP are encouraged, although until TSEP is fully established, these will be limited in number. Before submitting such articles, please contact one of the Editors, or a member of the Editorial Advisory Board with an outline of your proposal and your expertise in the area of your review.