M.S. Alshuhri , A.A. Alhulail , A.G.M. Alqahtani , Y. Madkhali , M. Aljuhani , R.A. Alghuraybi , S. Alqahtani , O.I. Alomair , M. Alqahtani , A.H. Qaisi , M.S. Almalki
{"title":"Stability of ADC measurements in diffusion MRI: A multicenter phantom study using multi-point b-values","authors":"M.S. Alshuhri , A.A. Alhulail , A.G.M. Alqahtani , Y. Madkhali , M. Aljuhani , R.A. Alghuraybi , S. Alqahtani , O.I. Alomair , M. Alqahtani , A.H. Qaisi , M.S. Almalki","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion MRI provides critical insights into tissue microstructure and is influenced by various b-values. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of multiple b-values on ADC measurements using a multicenter observational approach with different MRI scanners and phantoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized a liquid isotropic phantom across eight different 1.5 T MRI scanners from five centers. The phantom contained four fluids with different viscosity and relaxation properties. ADC measurements were obtained at b-values of 0, 50, 500, 1000, and 1500 s/mm<sup>2</sup> using standardized protocols, which involved applying consistent imaging parameters across all MRI scanners. Each scan was repeated three times, and statistical analyses, including Kruskal–Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate variability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant variations in ADC values were observed among different MRI scanners. Higher b-values generally resulted in lower ADC readings, reflecting restricted diffusion. The comparison between 2-point and multiple-point b-value techniques revealed that the latter provides more consistent ADC measurements. Bland–Altman analysis indicated a systematic difference between single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, with TSE showing more homogeneous ADC values.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the significant variability in ADC measurements across different MRI scanners and sequences, emphasizing the critical role of standardization in diffusion MRI protocols. The findings demonstrate that multiple-point b-value techniques offer greater consistency compared to 2-point methods, and TSE sequences yield more homogeneous ADC values than ssEPI.</div></div><div><h3>Implication</h3><div>These findings underscore the need for standardized protocols and multicenter guidelines to enhance the reliability of ADC as a diagnostic biomarker in clinical and research settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 212-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424003407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion MRI provides critical insights into tissue microstructure and is influenced by various b-values. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of multiple b-values on ADC measurements using a multicenter observational approach with different MRI scanners and phantoms.
Methods
The study utilized a liquid isotropic phantom across eight different 1.5 T MRI scanners from five centers. The phantom contained four fluids with different viscosity and relaxation properties. ADC measurements were obtained at b-values of 0, 50, 500, 1000, and 1500 s/mm2 using standardized protocols, which involved applying consistent imaging parameters across all MRI scanners. Each scan was repeated three times, and statistical analyses, including Kruskal–Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U tests, were performed to evaluate variability.
Results
Significant variations in ADC values were observed among different MRI scanners. Higher b-values generally resulted in lower ADC readings, reflecting restricted diffusion. The comparison between 2-point and multiple-point b-value techniques revealed that the latter provides more consistent ADC measurements. Bland–Altman analysis indicated a systematic difference between single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) and turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences, with TSE showing more homogeneous ADC values.
Conclusions
This study highlights the significant variability in ADC measurements across different MRI scanners and sequences, emphasizing the critical role of standardization in diffusion MRI protocols. The findings demonstrate that multiple-point b-value techniques offer greater consistency compared to 2-point methods, and TSE sequences yield more homogeneous ADC values than ssEPI.
Implication
These findings underscore the need for standardized protocols and multicenter guidelines to enhance the reliability of ADC as a diagnostic biomarker in clinical and research settings.
扩散MRI的表观扩散系数(ADC)提供了对组织微观结构的关键见解,并受到各种b值的影响。本研究旨在评估多个b值对ADC测量的影响,采用多中心观察方法,使用不同的MRI扫描仪和模型。方法采用液体各向同性幻像,横跨来自5个中心的8台不同的1.5 T MRI扫描仪。幻影包含四种具有不同粘度和弛豫特性的流体。采用标准化方案,在0、50、500、1000和1500 s/mm2的b值下获得ADC测量值,其中包括在所有MRI扫描仪上应用一致的成像参数。每次扫描重复三次,并进行统计分析,包括Kruskal-Wallis和bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney U测试,以评估变异性。结果ADC值在不同的MRI扫描仪上有显著差异。较高的b值通常导致较低的ADC读数,反映了扩散受限。两点和多点b值技术之间的比较表明,后者提供更一致的ADC测量。Bland-Altman分析表明,单次回波-平面成像(ssEPI)与涡轮自旋回波(TSE)序列存在系统差异,TSE显示出更均匀的ADC值。本研究强调了不同MRI扫描仪和序列之间ADC测量的显著差异,强调了扩散MRI协议标准化的关键作用。研究结果表明,与两点方法相比,多点b值技术提供了更高的一致性,TSE序列产生的ADC值比ssEPI更均匀。这些发现强调了标准化方案和多中心指南的必要性,以提高ADC作为临床和研究环境中诊断性生物标志物的可靠性。
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.