Stochastic consensus for uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making problem in belief distribution environment

IF 7.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Applied Soft Computing Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112495
Xianchao Dai , Hao Li , Ligang Zhou , Qun Wu
{"title":"Stochastic consensus for uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making problem in belief distribution environment","authors":"Xianchao Dai ,&nbsp;Hao Li ,&nbsp;Ligang Zhou ,&nbsp;Qun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the realm of uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, existing research often focuses on the development of consensus-enhancing algorithms grounded in optimization models. However, this paper takes a stochastic perspective, thoroughly considering the impact of uncertainty on decision-making. And a novel stochastic method to model group consensus is introduced with the listed three components: (1) the concept of stochastic rank analysis based on stochastic belief distribution (BD) is given to measure the uncertainty degree in the original BD matrix, which is then used to assign weights to decision makers (DMs). (2) in uncertain environments, to ensure the effectiveness of consensus from a probabilistic perspective, the stochastic consensus index is proposed by taking both the advantages of the Jensen-Shannon (JS) distance and the hesitant distance between stochastic BDs. Then, the expected acceptable group consensus index is further provided to measure the consensus of original preferences among the group, and (3) finally, to deal with the issue of no consensus information, an optimization model is constructed aimed at achieving an acceptable consensus that can generate recommendation advice for DMs, facilitating the attainment of a consensus. The effectiveness of the proposed method is exemplified through two case studies: purchase of new energy vehicles (NEVs) and a postgraduate interview scenario. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are presented to better prove its advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 112495"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494624012699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, existing research often focuses on the development of consensus-enhancing algorithms grounded in optimization models. However, this paper takes a stochastic perspective, thoroughly considering the impact of uncertainty on decision-making. And a novel stochastic method to model group consensus is introduced with the listed three components: (1) the concept of stochastic rank analysis based on stochastic belief distribution (BD) is given to measure the uncertainty degree in the original BD matrix, which is then used to assign weights to decision makers (DMs). (2) in uncertain environments, to ensure the effectiveness of consensus from a probabilistic perspective, the stochastic consensus index is proposed by taking both the advantages of the Jensen-Shannon (JS) distance and the hesitant distance between stochastic BDs. Then, the expected acceptable group consensus index is further provided to measure the consensus of original preferences among the group, and (3) finally, to deal with the issue of no consensus information, an optimization model is constructed aimed at achieving an acceptable consensus that can generate recommendation advice for DMs, facilitating the attainment of a consensus. The effectiveness of the proposed method is exemplified through two case studies: purchase of new energy vehicles (NEVs) and a postgraduate interview scenario. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are presented to better prove its advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信念分布环境下不确定多属性群体决策问题的随机一致性
在不确定多属性群体决策(MAGDM)问题中,现有的研究往往侧重于基于优化模型的共识增强算法的开发。然而,本文采用了随机视角,充分考虑了不确定性对决策的影响。在此基础上,提出了一种新的群体共识的随机建模方法,该方法由三个部分组成:(1)提出了基于随机信念分布(BD)的随机秩分析概念,用于度量原始BD矩阵的不确定性,并利用该不确定性来为决策者分配权重;(2)在不确定环境下,为了从概率角度保证共识的有效性,利用Jensen-Shannon (JS)距离和随机bp之间的犹豫距离的优势,提出了随机共识指数。(3)最后,针对没有共识信息的问题,构建了一个以达成可接受共识为目标的优化模型,该优化模型可以生成dm的推荐建议,促进共识的达成。通过购买新能源汽车和研究生面试两个案例,验证了该方法的有效性。通过灵敏度分析和对比分析,更好地证明了该方法的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Digital twin-assisted fault diagnosis framework for rolling bearings under imbalanced data Editorial Board Editorial Board Hierarchical Scale Awareness for object detection in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Scenes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1