Enhanced nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using optimized constructed wetlands: A comprehensive screening of microbial complexes, substrates, and macrophytes
Farhan Nabi , Yaqin Peng , Rakhwe Kama , Sumbal Sajid , Fareed Uddin Memon , Chongjian Ma , Huashou Li
{"title":"Enhanced nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater using optimized constructed wetlands: A comprehensive screening of microbial complexes, substrates, and macrophytes","authors":"Farhan Nabi , Yaqin Peng , Rakhwe Kama , Sumbal Sajid , Fareed Uddin Memon , Chongjian Ma , Huashou Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Constructed wetlands (CWs) are widely used to treat wastewater from aquaculture, and their efficiency largely depends on active components like microbes, substrates, and macrophytes. This study screened various commercial microbial complexes, substrates, and macrophytes for their effectiveness in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from pond wastewater contaminated with fish feed and excreta (CPW). Four microbial complexes (MC1, MC2, MC3, and MC4) were screened, two substrate types (zeolite and ceramsite), and five common macrophytes—<em>Pontederia crassipes</em> (PC), <em>Myriophyllum aquaticum</em> (MA), <em>Canna indica</em> (CI), <em>Typha latifolia</em> (TL), and <em>Phragmites australis</em> (PA). Screening evaluation included COD, total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), nitrate nitrogen (NN), and total phosphorus (TP) removal. Among microbial complexes, MC3 at 1.0 g/L (MC3-T2) exhibited the highest efficiency in COD (56 %), TN (66 %), AN (51 %), NN (69 %), and TP (59 %) removal. Screening of macrophytes showed that MA was most efficient with a decrease of 61 % COD, 91 % TN, 62 % AN, 84 % NN, and 69 % TP. Similarly, between both substrates, zeolite most effective, with 50–25 % COD, 12–7 % TN, 44–28 % AN, 71–47 % NN, and 45–19 % TP removal over six periods. Based on these findings, four artificial CWs were developed, with CW-2 (which carries MA, CI, MC3-T2, and zeolite) showed the highest removal of COD (57–43 %), TN (29–11 %), AN (65–28 %), NN (87–69 %), and TP (80–47 %) over eight periods. The development of CWs by utilizing these optimal components (particularly CW-2) provides highly effective solutions for excessive nutrients removal from CPW. This innovative approach presents a promising alternative for mitigating eutrophication and enhancing wastewater treatment processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 106634"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471442401866X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are widely used to treat wastewater from aquaculture, and their efficiency largely depends on active components like microbes, substrates, and macrophytes. This study screened various commercial microbial complexes, substrates, and macrophytes for their effectiveness in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from pond wastewater contaminated with fish feed and excreta (CPW). Four microbial complexes (MC1, MC2, MC3, and MC4) were screened, two substrate types (zeolite and ceramsite), and five common macrophytes—Pontederia crassipes (PC), Myriophyllum aquaticum (MA), Canna indica (CI), Typha latifolia (TL), and Phragmites australis (PA). Screening evaluation included COD, total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), nitrate nitrogen (NN), and total phosphorus (TP) removal. Among microbial complexes, MC3 at 1.0 g/L (MC3-T2) exhibited the highest efficiency in COD (56 %), TN (66 %), AN (51 %), NN (69 %), and TP (59 %) removal. Screening of macrophytes showed that MA was most efficient with a decrease of 61 % COD, 91 % TN, 62 % AN, 84 % NN, and 69 % TP. Similarly, between both substrates, zeolite most effective, with 50–25 % COD, 12–7 % TN, 44–28 % AN, 71–47 % NN, and 45–19 % TP removal over six periods. Based on these findings, four artificial CWs were developed, with CW-2 (which carries MA, CI, MC3-T2, and zeolite) showed the highest removal of COD (57–43 %), TN (29–11 %), AN (65–28 %), NN (87–69 %), and TP (80–47 %) over eight periods. The development of CWs by utilizing these optimal components (particularly CW-2) provides highly effective solutions for excessive nutrients removal from CPW. This innovative approach presents a promising alternative for mitigating eutrophication and enhancing wastewater treatment processes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies