A qualitative study investigating fatigue among Indonesian freight-train drivers

Sevty Auliani , Hafizha Fidya Az-Zahra , Chicha Nursagita , Herman Soetisna , Hardianto Iridiastadi , Wiwik Budiawan
{"title":"A qualitative study investigating fatigue among Indonesian freight-train drivers","authors":"Sevty Auliani ,&nbsp;Hafizha Fidya Az-Zahra ,&nbsp;Chicha Nursagita ,&nbsp;Herman Soetisna ,&nbsp;Hardianto Iridiastadi ,&nbsp;Wiwik Budiawan","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fatigue among Indonesian coal freight train drivers is a risk factor that has never been investigated. This study evaluated fatigue among these train drivers and sought to determine work- and non work-related factors contributing to fatigue. The objectives were achieved by conducting a field observation and semi-structured interviews (SSI) with 21 freight train drivers. Using a thematic analysis, four groups of factors (themes) were identified: 1) work demand, 2) management support, 3) quality of work and rest facilities, and 4) organizational issues. Findings of this study demonstrated that fatigue among the drivers was unnecessarily excessive. Several important causes of fatigue included extended period of duty duration (exceeding company policy), adverse working physical environment, and the difficulty in obtaining good quality of rest, particularly at the destination (transit) station. Rest period between shifts was deemed inadequate, and back-to-back duties (separated with less than 8 h of rest) were often unavoidable. Satisfactory personnel scheduling and assignments were challenging, due to the complex nature of the external coal company operating environment, in addition to the freight train lowest track priority that resulted in services backlogs, delays, and frequent stops along the routes. While further studies were needed, short-term interventions could be done, including more ergonomic locomotive cabin and improving rest facilities at the transit station. Long-term initiatives might include better coordination and communication with the coal company, especially in developing more accurate departure and arrival estimates and train timetables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fatigue among Indonesian coal freight train drivers is a risk factor that has never been investigated. This study evaluated fatigue among these train drivers and sought to determine work- and non work-related factors contributing to fatigue. The objectives were achieved by conducting a field observation and semi-structured interviews (SSI) with 21 freight train drivers. Using a thematic analysis, four groups of factors (themes) were identified: 1) work demand, 2) management support, 3) quality of work and rest facilities, and 4) organizational issues. Findings of this study demonstrated that fatigue among the drivers was unnecessarily excessive. Several important causes of fatigue included extended period of duty duration (exceeding company policy), adverse working physical environment, and the difficulty in obtaining good quality of rest, particularly at the destination (transit) station. Rest period between shifts was deemed inadequate, and back-to-back duties (separated with less than 8 h of rest) were often unavoidable. Satisfactory personnel scheduling and assignments were challenging, due to the complex nature of the external coal company operating environment, in addition to the freight train lowest track priority that resulted in services backlogs, delays, and frequent stops along the routes. While further studies were needed, short-term interventions could be done, including more ergonomic locomotive cabin and improving rest facilities at the transit station. Long-term initiatives might include better coordination and communication with the coal company, especially in developing more accurate departure and arrival estimates and train timetables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项调查印尼货运列车司机疲劳的定性研究
印尼煤炭货运列车司机的疲劳是一个从未被调查过的风险因素。这项研究评估了这些火车司机的疲劳程度,并试图确定导致疲劳的工作和非工作因素。通过对21名货运列车司机进行实地观察和半结构化访谈(SSI),实现了这些目标。通过主题分析,确定了四组因素(主题):1)工作需求,2)管理支持,3)工作和休息设施质量,以及4)组织问题。本研究结果表明,驾驶员疲劳过度是不必要的。疲劳的几个重要原因包括工作时间延长(超过公司政策)、不利的工作物理环境以及难以获得高质量的休息,特别是在目的地(中转)站。轮班之间的休息时间被认为是不够的,背靠背的工作(休息时间少于8小时)往往是不可避免的。由于外部煤炭公司经营环境的复杂性,加上货运列车的最低轨道优先级导致服务积压、延误和沿途频繁停靠,令人满意的人员调度和分配是具有挑战性的。虽然需要进一步的研究,但可以采取短期干预措施,包括增加符合人体工程学的机车车厢和改善中转站的休息设施。长期举措可能包括与煤炭公司更好地协调和沟通,特别是在制定更准确的出发和到达估计以及列车时刻表方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1