Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: Perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126541
Lisette M. Harteveld , Lisanne M. van Leeuwen , Sjoerd M. Euser , Lucy J. Smit , Karlijn C. Vollebregt , Debby Bogaert , Marlies A. van Houten
{"title":"Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: Perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands","authors":"Lisette M. Harteveld ,&nbsp;Lisanne M. van Leeuwen ,&nbsp;Sjoerd M. Euser ,&nbsp;Lucy J. Smit ,&nbsp;Karlijn C. Vollebregt ,&nbsp;Debby Bogaert ,&nbsp;Marlies A. van Houten","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of infant respiratory disease. Recent approval of preventive measures like a long-acting monoclonal antibody and a maternal vaccine signals a potential shift in early-life RSV infection control. However, success hinges on acceptance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women and partners in the Netherlands, recruited via healthcare professionals, social media platforms, and the 9-Months Fair. The survey assessed willingness and motivation for maternal RSV vaccination and neonatal RSV immunization, including strategy preferences and informational needs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total 1001 pregnant women (mean age: 31.1 years) and their partners (mean age: 33.2 years) completed the survey. On average, they were 24 weeks pregnant at the time, and 54.6 % had no other children yet. The majority was Dutch-born (95.2 % of women); with 68.3 % of women having completed higher education and with overall strong pro-vaccination attitudes (93.9 % of partners intended to vaccinate their expected newborn). The overall acceptability to vaccination and immunization was high, with 87 % of respondents indicating they would (likely) accept both strategies. A positive attitude towards both methods was associated with previous experience with severity of RSV, intention to vaccinate the newborn and parental vaccination status during childhood and current pregnancy. When the choice was given, the majority of participants, in particular those with children and the intention to breastfeed, favoured maternal vaccination over passive immunization of infants (75.3 % of the pregnant and 71.6 % of the partners). A majority of the respondents cited optimal protection for the child and knowledge of RSV as important factors for accepting RSV prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While most participants would accept both strategies for RSV protection of their infant, a majority, especially those with other children, favoured maternal vaccination, due to concerns about infant safety and awareness of RSV severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 126541"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24012234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of infant respiratory disease. Recent approval of preventive measures like a long-acting monoclonal antibody and a maternal vaccine signals a potential shift in early-life RSV infection control. However, success hinges on acceptance.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among pregnant women and partners in the Netherlands, recruited via healthcare professionals, social media platforms, and the 9-Months Fair. The survey assessed willingness and motivation for maternal RSV vaccination and neonatal RSV immunization, including strategy preferences and informational needs.

Results

In total 1001 pregnant women (mean age: 31.1 years) and their partners (mean age: 33.2 years) completed the survey. On average, they were 24 weeks pregnant at the time, and 54.6 % had no other children yet. The majority was Dutch-born (95.2 % of women); with 68.3 % of women having completed higher education and with overall strong pro-vaccination attitudes (93.9 % of partners intended to vaccinate their expected newborn). The overall acceptability to vaccination and immunization was high, with 87 % of respondents indicating they would (likely) accept both strategies. A positive attitude towards both methods was associated with previous experience with severity of RSV, intention to vaccinate the newborn and parental vaccination status during childhood and current pregnancy. When the choice was given, the majority of participants, in particular those with children and the intention to breastfeed, favoured maternal vaccination over passive immunization of infants (75.3 % of the pregnant and 71.6 % of the partners). A majority of the respondents cited optimal protection for the child and knowledge of RSV as important factors for accepting RSV prophylaxis.

Conclusions

While most participants would accept both strategies for RSV protection of their infant, a majority, especially those with other children, favoured maternal vaccination, due to concerns about infant safety and awareness of RSV severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)预防:荷兰准父母的认知和意愿
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是婴儿呼吸道疾病的主要病因。最近批准的预防措施,如长效单克隆抗体和母亲疫苗,标志着生命早期RSV感染控制的潜在转变。然而,成功取决于接受。方法:我们对荷兰的孕妇及其伴侣进行了横断面调查,通过医疗保健专业人员、社交媒体平台和9个月博览会招募。该调查评估了母亲接种RSV疫苗和新生儿接种RSV疫苗的意愿和动机,包括策略偏好和信息需求。结果共1001名孕妇(平均年龄31.1岁)及其伴侣(平均年龄33.2岁)完成调查。平均而言,她们当时怀孕24周,54.6%的人还没有其他孩子。大多数是荷兰出生的(95.2%的女性);68.3%的妇女完成了高等教育,总体上持强烈的支持接种态度(93.9%的伴侣打算为其预期新生儿接种疫苗)。疫苗接种和免疫的总体可接受性很高,87%的答复者表示他们(可能)接受这两种战略。对这两种方法的积极态度与以往呼吸道合胞病毒严重程度的经验、新生儿接种意愿以及父母在儿童期和当前妊娠期间的疫苗接种情况有关。在进行选择时,大多数参与者,特别是那些有孩子并打算母乳喂养的参与者,倾向于母亲接种疫苗,而不是婴儿被动免疫(孕妇的75.3%和伴侣的71.6%)。大多数应答者认为对儿童的最佳保护和对呼吸道合胞病毒的了解是接受呼吸道合胞病毒预防的重要因素。结论:虽然大多数参与者会接受这两种策略来保护他们的婴儿,但大多数人,特别是那些有其他孩子的人,出于对婴儿安全性的考虑和对RSV严重程度的认识,倾向于母亲接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Re: Using observational data to explore the hypothesis that a single dose of current HPV vaccines can provide durable protection: Reply to the commentary written by Christine Velicer, Alain Luxembourg, Ya-Ting Chen, Melvin Kohn, and Alfred Saah, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA on the IARC-India HPV vaccine study. The stability of PCV2 virus-like particles from mammalian cells and challenges for biotechnological applications Assessing human B cell responses to influenza virus vaccines and adjuvants in a PBMC-derived in vitro culture system The effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in Mexico: A time series approach Exploring Chatbot contributions to enhancing vaccine literacy and uptake: A scoping review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1